Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade) | Page 5900 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

GBP/JPY, GBP/USD

Similar Threads

Auslanco-GBP/JPY Strength Indicator strategy 345 replies

Auslanco 15min GBP/JPY startegy 630 replies

My MT4 indicators for Auslanco's strategy 92 replies

Auslanco 15 minute Strategy Oanda FXManager Updates.. 62 replies

Questions About Auslanco's Trades 72 replies

Attachments: Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)
Exit Attachments

Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)

  • #117,981
  • Sep 29, 2008 1:35pm Sep 29, 2008 1:35pm
Quoting TraderStar
Fire Paulson, jail Greenspan, draft a sane bill and start again.
And don't lie to us .. it will cost $5 trillion, not 700 billion (Bill Gates could write a personal check for that .. as probably could several in this thread )

lol at the first part, not so sure about the second part, Billionaires dont get bored enough to hang their hats with us pee ons
"Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do"
  • #117,982
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:11pm Sep 29, 2008 2:11pm
Bye-bye bill... Republicans are a bunch of populist pussies, playing to their dumb constituents;

NP, the Fed will continue to pump the money into the system and all golden parachutes, without even asking the Congress, and without seeing that money back ever again.

McCain can go fishing now.
"Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money" - Danny De Vito
  • #117,983
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:11pm Sep 29, 2008 2:11pm
How is it his fault? Hasn't he been out of control long enough to blame for anything now?

Quoting TraderStar
Fire Paulson, jail Greenspan, draft a sane bill and start again.
And don't lie to us .. it will cost $5 trillion, not 700 billion (Bill Gates could write a personal check for that .. as probably could several in this thread )
  • #117,984
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:17pm Sep 29, 2008 2:17pm
Quoting rrram2
How is it his fault? Hasn't he been out of control long enough to blame for anything now?
This problem did not start overnight. It started years ago while Greenspan was still the head. I do believe he shares some blame.

B
  • #117,985
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:19pm Sep 29, 2008 2:19pm
Quoting slide
Bye-bye bill... Republicans are a bunch of populist pussies, playing to their dumb constituents;

NP, the Fed will continue to pump the money into the system and all golden parachutes, without even asking the Congress, and without seeing that money back ever again.

McCain can go fishing now.
I really don't get it why replublicans rejected the bill. Isn't it proposed by their own republican administration? This is really causing me dizzy and confused ..
  • #117,986
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:29pm Sep 29, 2008 2:29pm
Hahaa Maria seems very worried LOL
"Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do"
  • #117,987
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:32pm Sep 29, 2008 2:32pm
Quoting mktjong
I really don't get it why replublicans rejected the bill. Isn't it proposed by their own republican administration? This is really causing me dizzy and confused ..
Because I am a Republican, I hope I can answer this. Our view is that minimal Government intervention should be allowed in the private sector. If my store failed, I would not expect the govt to help me cover my debts to buy time. We feel the same way about this situation but even more so. We have these people who took tremendous risks and got to live in mansions and live the good life. Now, because they made high risk transactios and they made a bad "bet", I am against saving them. I am in the middle class with 3 kids. Why should my tax dollars save these companies?

Not only this but the Repubs are saying they are receiving 100 to 1 calls against the bill from their constituents. They are supposed to vote what their constituents want although it rarely works that way.

Last point is that yes, the Repubs (Paulsen) got the ball rolling on this. However, he is what we call a liberal republican and basically doesnt agree with our idea of staying out of the market.

I'm not saying that what I believe is right or wrong, however they are my beliefs.

I wish I had a good idea myself but this is beyond me.

B
  • #117,988
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:40pm Sep 29, 2008 2:40pm
plop
  • #117,989
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:44pm Sep 29, 2008 2:44pm
Quoting bigcoupe
Because I am a Republican, I hope I can answer this. Our view is that minimal Government intervention should be allowed in the private sector. If my store failed, I would not expect the govt to help me cover my debts to buy time. We feel the same way about this situation but even more so. We have these people who took tremendous risks and got to live in mansions and live the good life. Now, because they made high risk transactios and they made a bad "bet", I am against saving them. I am in the middle class with 3 kids. Why should my tax dollars save these companies?

Not only this but the Repubs are saying they are receiving 100 to 1 calls against the bill from their constituents. They are supposed to vote what their constituents want although it rarely works that way.

Last point is that yes, the Repubs (Paulsen) got the ball rolling on this. However, he is what we call a liberal republican and basically doesnt agree with our idea of staying out of the market.

I'm not saying that what I believe is right or wrong, however they are my beliefs.

I wish I had a good idea myself but this is beyond me.

B
I don't what to say .. I disagree to some degree.
  • #117,990
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:58pm Sep 29, 2008 2:58pm
Quoting mktjong
I don't what to say .. I disagree to some degree.
I agree that many will disagree.

Let's keep the politics out and figure out where we go from here.

B
  • #117,991
  • Sep 29, 2008 2:59pm Sep 29, 2008 2:59pm
Tell u what man there is some good deals for buying today in equities MT LT
"Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do"
  • #117,992
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:03pm Sep 29, 2008 3:03pm
longer term it's better the deal didn't pass because the proposal goes to the corporations that got us in this mess and does little to fix the problem.
  • #117,993
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:05pm Sep 29, 2008 3:05pm
Quoting bigcoupe
Because I am a Republican, I hope I can answer this. Our view is that minimal Government intervention should be allowed in the private sector. If my store failed, I would not expect the govt to help me cover my debts to buy time. We feel the same way about this situation but even more so. We have these people who took tremendous risks and got to live in mansions and live the good life. Now, because they made high risk transactios and they made a bad "bet", I am against saving them. I am in the middle class with 3 kids. Why should my tax dollars save these companies?

Not only this but the Repubs are saying they are receiving 100 to 1 calls against the bill from their constituents. They are supposed to vote what their constituents want although it rarely works that way.

Last point is that yes, the Repubs (Paulsen) got the ball rolling on this. However, he is what we call a liberal republican and basically doesnt agree with our idea of staying out of the market.

I'm not saying that what I believe is right or wrong, however they are my beliefs.

I wish I had a good idea myself but this is beyond me.

B
you know i just dont get it, so far i've never seen a reason against the bailout thing expect the extra tax that American people should pay, banks and markets are no longer functioning, i'd rather look forward to see what consequences we gonna have in the future if alot of big players fail, come on man! people not paying back their debt and going further to refuse to help those banks.
I recommend you read something else as this sentence is now concluded.
  • #117,994
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:06pm Sep 29, 2008 3:06pm
time to long?
  • #117,995
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:06pm Sep 29, 2008 3:06pm
Quoting bigcoupe
I agree that many will disagree.

Let's keep the politics out and figure out where we go from here.

B

bigcoupe: whether i agree or disagree is immaterial, i believe. that said, the system needs a correction. will it be through market forces, or by government intervention, we shall see.

the fat cats on Wall Street need to be held accountable.

why should the tax payer foot the "$xxM" retirement fund for the CEOs of these companies?
  • #117,996
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:09pm Sep 29, 2008 3:09pm
Quoting Obaidah
you know i just dont get it, so far i've never seen a reason against the bailout thing expect the extra tax that American people should pay, banks and markets are no longer functioning, i'd rather look forward to see what consequences we gonna have in the future if alot of big players fail, come on man! people not paying back their debt and going further to refuse to help those banks.
it's a result of propping the market up too long and abusing the unregulated system. markets aren't meant to go up in straight lines. those people didn't qualify for AAA loans and it was because of the banks negligence. they knew the consequences and if anyone is liable it's the banks and the government for misusing their authority.
  • #117,997
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:13pm Sep 29, 2008 3:13pm
i never realized the republicans were such a whiny party. they did nothing to prevent the problem from happening and now their blaming everyone else for the fall out.
  • #117,998
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:15pm Sep 29, 2008 3:15pm
Quoting bigcoupe
I agree that many will disagree.

Let's keep the politics out and figure out where we go from here.

B
I am an independent but if I would to give my comment on this is: Majority of the republicans are a group of proud, arrogant, and short-sighted politicians.
  • #117,999
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:16pm Sep 29, 2008 3:16pm
charts people charts!! i'm done debating.... can we have some ta from our technical gurus?
  • #118,000
  • Sep 29, 2008 3:21pm Sep 29, 2008 3:21pm
prepare for a large drop in opening market asia in 40 minutes
(on my broker)...
408 traders viewing now