ok so lilmoe when you say route your order are you saying they give you a bad fill as in the spread or are you saying the price itself isn't what it is with some brokers? anyone reply i don't think he's here. thanks....
Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)
We need to see it in a bigger picture. What is the root cause of all this? Can we get the economy grow without fixing this root cause? I think you can answer this question yourself.
Ok, am better silent now and let others with other perpectives chime in. Since it's Saturday morning and have plenty of time to relax at home and afford to spend more time on the internet
- #116,164
- Sep 21, 2008 10:16am Sep 21, 2008 10:16am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined May 2008 | 3,395 Posts
The Market pays you to be disciplined
- #116,166
- Sep 21, 2008 11:43am Sep 21, 2008 11:43am
- Joined Oct 2005 | Status: Trader | 3,596 Posts
Here is an article I posted earlier:
This spectacle necessarily raises the question: if the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can't it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure? By the same token, if $85bn can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream? And if ever more corporations need taxpayer funds to stay afloat, why can't taxpayers make demands in return – like caps on executive pay, and a guarantee against more job losses?
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...stcount=116167
This spectacle necessarily raises the question: if the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can't it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure? By the same token, if $85bn can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream? And if ever more corporations need taxpayer funds to stay afloat, why can't taxpayers make demands in return – like caps on executive pay, and a guarantee against more job losses?
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...stcount=116167
"Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is resisting a Democratic push to add additional help for households to the $700 billion bailout bill. "We need this to be clean and to be quick," Paulson said in an interview on ABC's "This Week." Paulson resisted suggestions being made by Democrats that the program be changed to include further relief for homeowners facing mortgage foreclosures and to include an additional $50 billion stimulus effort. Some Democrats have also suggested capping compensation of executives at firms who get the bailout help..."
the bailout isn't for the homeowners...
[
Here is an article I posted earlier:
This spectacle necessarily raises the question: if the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can't it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure? By the same token, if $85bn can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream? And if ever more corporations need taxpayer funds to stay afloat, why can't taxpayers make demands in return – like caps on executive pay, and a guarantee against more job losses?
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...stcount=116167
- #116,168
- Sep 21, 2008 12:07pm Sep 21, 2008 12:07pm
- Joined May 2008 | Status: has long shorts | 2,584 Posts
:nerd:here's my idea. 
if you really wanted to change the world the best thing to do is to make all patents in regards to making alternative fuel and energy voidable if they are not currently being developed on a reasonable scale and if their controlled by an industry that is in the industry of providing cruder sources of energy they would have to release their patent. a new source of energy would then be rapidly developed. the next step would be the one i already mentioned and that is tighter regulation of lenders and the fed. of course this all illusionary and there's no way in hell that would happen and that's the way it is.
they can make energy out of zinc and magnesium.. i even think water can run in a combustion engine. i'm not lying my father worked on this project funded by nasa called the smart plug and made the first plane in history fly without magnetos. he never go his credit out of the deal. he was offered a job on the flying car(not sure the real name) and he took the job but quite after a few days because he felt he was getting the same shaft. my point is there are projects that will work and know about them first hand.
if you really wanted to change the world the best thing to do is to make all patents in regards to making alternative fuel and energy voidable if they are not currently being developed on a reasonable scale and if their controlled by an industry that is in the industry of providing cruder sources of energy they would have to release their patent. a new source of energy would then be rapidly developed. the next step would be the one i already mentioned and that is tighter regulation of lenders and the fed. of course this all illusionary and there's no way in hell that would happen and that's the way it is. they can make energy out of zinc and magnesium.. i even think water can run in a combustion engine. i'm not lying my father worked on this project funded by nasa called the smart plug and made the first plane in history fly without magnetos. he never go his credit out of the deal. he was offered a job on the flying car(not sure the real name) and he took the job but quite after a few days because he felt he was getting the same shaft. my point is there are projects that will work and know about them first hand.
exactly their being juiced every penny. the fed should have raised interest rates more to stop it from getting out of hand too. by not doing that they have caused severe instability and made the problem much worse. i think on top of what you want done they need more regulation of lending and sticker rules on policy. such as if certain criteria is not met in the economy they can not raise or lower rates depending on the scenario such as inflationary or business conditions. the boe for example at least has to write a letter. but one step further they should have a committee that approves or disapproves of their actions. that's if things were fair but they are not because we know what devils these people are when it comes to money. regulation is the only way for their to be standards. i don't want super stick regulation just some regulations to prevent crisis from happening. recessions are a natural part of a cycle and should be allowed to occur. if their not allowed to occur it prolongs them when they happen and can include depressions. gdp is a very bad measure of the economy. a combination of factors makes a slow down. i know some of the things i mentioned (not many though) are being done and as you can see they are falling short of calibrating the system.
AND maybe Mr. Strong Dollar Policy Paulson will be respectful enough to follow
- #116,172
- Sep 21, 2008 12:37pm Sep 21, 2008 12:37pm
Here is an article I posted earlier:
This spectacle necessarily raises the question: if the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can't it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure? By the same token, if $85bn can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream? And if ever more corporations need taxpayer funds to stay afloat, why can't taxpayers make demands in return – like caps on executive pay, and a guarantee against more job losses?
http://www.forexfactory.com/showpost...stcount=116167
- #116,177
- Sep 21, 2008 1:10pm Sep 21, 2008 1:10pm
- | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Pakute Trader | 885 Posts
malcomb the 'newbies' would be a lot safer following me (but don't do it, newbies!! 
) than they would following YOUR system which jumps back and forth constantly.
I am not 'married' to any trend .. I follow longer term trends. GY has been bearish until proven otherwise and within that I short rallies and make pips doing so.
Thursday and Friday it started reversing .. I mostly stepped aside, went long once and shorted a few rallies.
Now it looks more bullish .. I will stand aside or buy dips cautionsly until I am sure of the trend/
I trade differently than you .. and I make pips .. so stop your bashing, to each his own way of trading!
) than they would following YOUR system which jumps back and forth constantly.I am not 'married' to any trend .. I follow longer term trends. GY has been bearish until proven otherwise and within that I short rallies and make pips doing so.
Thursday and Friday it started reversing .. I mostly stepped aside, went long once and shorted a few rallies.
Now it looks more bullish .. I will stand aside or buy dips cautionsly until I am sure of the trend/
I trade differently than you .. and I make pips .. so stop your bashing, to each his own way of trading!
Traderstar is married to the bearish trend ... which is not even there anymore on the daily charts. His / her mind is playing tricks with them . This is a good lesson for new traders DO NOT GET MARRIED TO THE TREND THAT IS IN YOUR MIND .. READ YOUR CHARTS WITH A FREE MIND AND LET YOUR CHARTS TELL YOU THE TREND.... we have had a 1200 ...not 100 .. move of the bottom and Traderstar is still saying short the rallies is the way to go ...get real !!!
- #116,179
- Sep 21, 2008 1:22pm Sep 21, 2008 1:22pm
- | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Pakute Trader | 885 Posts
actually its googol, 1 followed by one hundred zero, or ten duotrigintillion, or ten thousand sexdecillion
I think, if the conspiricy buffs are right & the NWO becomes reality, Google will be Big Brother.
In fact, I think it already is ....
