Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade) | Page 5808 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

GBP/JPY, GBP/USD

Similar Threads

Auslanco-GBP/JPY Strength Indicator strategy 345 replies

Auslanco 15min GBP/JPY startegy 630 replies

My MT4 indicators for Auslanco's strategy 92 replies

Auslanco 15 minute Strategy Oanda FXManager Updates.. 62 replies

Questions About Auslanco's Trades 72 replies

Attachments: Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)
Exit Attachments

Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)

  • #116,141
  • Sep 20, 2008 10:29pm Sep 20, 2008 10:29pm
Markam,

I tell u what Freedom of a nation a ppl an entirety like u say will be lost in an instant shoudl such a bill be signed into existant. That will be the beginning of the end for every human on the planet. As it is written in the Bible. It will matter nothing where u live for such a step reaps a strong hold of slavery. I hope the ppl can understand what the big picture of this will produce in big picture.
Buy guns and bullets and take a few ruthlessness pills to calm the consciousness. for many a soul shall become stained and by the grace of the Lord may we all have forgiveness in our final hour.



I wish i never knew what i just seen Markam. Truely ppl get ready for the worst things this world has ever seen on record of GIAI. May peace be with you!!!!!!!!!!
"Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do"
  • #116,142
  • Sep 20, 2008 10:31pm Sep 20, 2008 10:31pm
Quoting lilmoe
easier said than done.

the larger the account gets, the harder it is to make that 10% per week

loosing 2% of 10k is $200, but losing 2% from a 100K is $2,000, can your mindset handle that? i don't want to mention what's 2% of a 1million account.

plus, don't get carried away, u'll have a hard time finding a broker that will take u as a client. i changed my broker 4 times now because of that reason. brokers DON'T like anything close to a successful trader. and i DONT mean by successful trader a trader who wins all the time.
2-5% MM is the most important thing, but i DON'T know a trader outside this thread that goes by MM rules, most aren't even familiar with the concept.

when i first started shorting GJ, at 213.80 i was risking 2% of my account. after being in the "Safe" zone, i started adding more shorts gradually till the total of my trades at some point were a massive 40% of my account. so for examle if i had a 10k account, it means i started with 2 minilots, and ended up at some point with 4 lots where 50 pips can wipe out 20% of your account. but here's the good part, it was all 2% MM. all my SLs where moved to profit is we went down. now if u get 1 of those per year, u're GOOD. Que has some good notes on MM, i advise all to read them.

but here's the sad part. i see 50-70% drawdowns ALOT of times, and i gotta tell you guys, it's NOT a pleasant view. when u're trading a 10K account, that's like loosing or "seeing" -5k. your mind might handle that in some cases without going insane. but what if u see a -50K on an "all your life worth of savings" 100K account?!?!?!?! u bet ur ASS u'll be sweating like a coke in humid weather. i've seen VERY intelegent people with these kinds of drawdowns. i don't know about them, but i'd get a heart attack.

u want to hear something funnier?? i know a trader (and this was infront of my eyes) who turned his 5k account into 238K in 1 week trading oil and YM agressively, and lost the entire account on the 8th day. his trades were NOT random, and his analysis are some of the best i've seen outside this thread. but when he started seeing one loss after another, he tried sooooooo hard to make up for that loss. i spent hours BEGGING his ass to withdraw at least 100K but he refused. why did he lose?

feer?
anger?
greed?

u name it
  • #116,143
  • Sep 20, 2008 10:55pm Sep 20, 2008 10:55pm
Quoting lilmoe
2-5% MM is the most important thing, but i DON'T know a trader outside this thread that goes by MM rules, most aren't even familiar with the concept.

when i first started shorting GJ, at 213.80 i was risking 2% of my account. after being in the "Safe" zone, i started adding more shorts gradually till the total of my trades at some point were a massive 40% of my account. so for examle if i had a 10k account, it means i started with 2 minilots, and ended up at some point with 4 lots where 50 pips can wipe out 20% of your account. but here's the good part, it was all 2% MM. all my SLs where moved to profit is we went down. now if u get 1 of those per year, u're GOOD. Que has some good notes on MM, i advise all to read them.

but here's the sad part. i see 50-70% drawdowns ALOT of times, and i gotta tell you guys, it's NOT a pleasant view. when u're trading a 10K account, that's like loosing or "seeing" -5k. your mind might handle that in some cases without going insane. but what if u see a -50K on an "all your life worth of savings" 100K account?!?!?!?! u bet ur ASS u'll be sweating like a coke in humid weather. i've seen VERY intelegent people with these kinds of drawdowns. i don't know about them, but i'd get a heart attack.

u want to hear something funnier?? i know a trader (and this was infront of my eyes) who turned his 5k account into 238K in 1 week trading oil and YM agressively, and lost the entire account on the 8th day. his trades were NOT random, and his analysis are some of the best i've seen outside this thread. but when he started seeing one loss after another, he tried sooooooo hard to make up for that loss. i spent hours BEGGING his ass to withdraw at least 100K but he refused. why did he lose?

feer?
anger?
greed?

u name it
neither, i guess he simply dont want to realize that looses is part of the game
I recommend you read something else as this sentence is now concluded.
  • #116,144
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:04pm Sep 20, 2008 11:04pm
Quoting lilmoe
a retail broker who "claims" that they do route even the smallest orders, lol... one that i wouldn't recommend if u don't live near where i live.
Deltastock or is it any one of the brokers listed...
  • #116,145
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:07pm Sep 20, 2008 11:07pm
Quoting Obaidah
neither, i guess he simply dont want to realize that looses is part of the game
yeah but he should have used a smaller account after getting ahead and if it blew up he would not be in the red.. i can handle money better than that.. if i had the capital i would be very rich man..
  • #116,146
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:09pm Sep 20, 2008 11:09pm
section 8 of that bill is the most dangerous.
  • #116,147
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:14pm Sep 20, 2008 11:14pm
so many lies when dealing with money. it's unbelievable what people will do to scheme people. i'm good at trading because it's an art to me. i have an appreciation for it but most are devils. i don't want to be to be the richest just what i can get with my skills.
  • #116,148
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:19pm Sep 20, 2008 11:19pm
Quoting rgitt05
Name Short scale
(USA and Modern British) Long scale

million

billion

trillion

quadrillion

quintillion

sextillion

septillion

octillion

nonillion

decillion

undecillion

duodecillion

tredecillion


quattuordecillion

quindecillion

sexdecillion

septendecillion

octodecillion

novemdecillion

vigintillion

centillion
So this would be a Centillon?

$ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
New voice message: Why are you calling me? If I need you, I'll call you!
  • #116,149
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:21pm Sep 20, 2008 11:21pm
Quoting KillerWhale
So this would be a Centillon?

$ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
that is severe hyper inflation.
  • #116,150
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:24pm Sep 20, 2008 11:24pm
Quoting markam
The current crisis will not collapse our country. Only the destruction of the dollar will do that. The United States cannot service its debt, and housing prices cannot be supported at current incomes. Housing prices must come down, and debt must be destroyed. I would much rather the companies that caused this mess to be the ones that get destroyed.

If they want to save the homeowner, there is a really simple solution. Allow anyone to turn over their owner-occupied house to the mortgage company with no penalties, no tax consequences, and no impact on their credit rating. The houses will be resold at a reasonable price, and many of the current banks and financial institutions will go under. However, rest assured, new companies will appear, and money will be available for loans at the proper rate and to people that are good credit risks.

This bailout will not be limited to 700 million, and it will not save anything. It will make a small group even more wealthy, and will destroy the dollar.
in your dreams

sorry i had to laugh... this entire thing is a JOKE, rich people are getting richer and richer and richer and richer..... and there isn't a DAMN thing that you, or ANYONE u know, can do about it.

if u ask me, this entire "play" was to filter out those who can't pay, or have too much debt. and not only did they lose their homes, but also got framed with "bad credit" in the process, which means they have to work as slaves for the next 5-7 years of their lives! where does all your money go when u can't buy a car? or a decent home? u just spend because u can't save.

hmmmmm. should i wait for those who can't pay their mortgage (After being so underpaid, and the price of everything nearly doubled)?, or should i just foreclose? which is cheaper? which is more feasible? more profitable?

the last year provided the answer to these questions, who caused these crises, and who benefited the most.
  • #116,151
  • Sep 20, 2008 11:32pm Sep 20, 2008 11:32pm
http://seoblackhat.com/wp-content/up...liet-paper.jpg
  • #116,152
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:08am Sep 21, 2008 12:08am
Quoting rgitt05
Name Short scale
(USA and Modern British) Long scale

million

billion

trillion

quadrillion

quintillion

sextillion

septillion

octillion

nonillion

decillion

undecillion

duodecillion

tredecillion


quattuordecillion

quindecillion

sexdecillion

septendecillion

octodecillion

novemdecillion

vigintillion

centillion
Don't forget the number google.
--post hoc ergo propter hoc--
  • #116,153
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:19am Sep 21, 2008 12:19am
You are absolutely right...Read this book " The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein


Look at these video:

http://www.naomiklein.org/video-audi...nment-bailouts

Here are the rest of them:


http://www.naomiklein.org/video-audio/video











Economic crisis is only making rich people richer...!!!!

The rich get richer...They use the taxpayers money to create a rescue to make money for the recoverly

Quoting lilmoe
in your dreams

sorry i had to laugh... this entire thing is a JOKE, rich people are getting richer and richer and richer and richer..... and there isn't a DAMN thing that you, or ANYONE u know, can do about it.

if u ask me, this entire "play" was to filter out those who can't pay, or have too much debt. and not only did they lose their homes, but also got framed with "bad credit" in the process, which means they have to work as slaves for the next 5-7 years of their lives! where does all your money go when u can't buy a car? or a decent home? u just spend because u can't save.

hmmmmm. should i wait for those who can't pay their mortgage (After being so underpaid, and the price of everything nearly doubled)?, or should i just foreclose? which is cheaper? which is more feasible? more profitable?

the last year provided the answer to these questions, who caused these crises, and who benefited the most.
[
  • #116,154
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:20am Sep 21, 2008 12:20am


Quoting Monk
Don't forget the number google.
[
  • #116,155
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:20am Sep 21, 2008 12:20am
Quoting Monk
Don't forget the number google.
actually its googol, 1 followed by one hundred zero, or ten duotrigintillion, or ten thousand sexdecillion
I recommend you read something else as this sentence is now concluded.
  • #116,156
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:32am Sep 21, 2008 12:32am
By Naomi Klein - September 19th, 2008

Whatever the events of this week mean, nobody should believe the overblown claims that the market crisis signals the death of "free market" ideology. Free market ideology has always been a servant to the interests of capital, and its presence ebbs and flows depending on its usefulness to those interests.


During boom times, it's profitable to preach laissez faire, because an absentee government allows speculative bubbles to inflate. When those bubbles burst, the ideology becomes a hindrance, and it goes dormant while big government rides to the rescue. But rest assured: the ideology will come roaring back when the bailouts are done. The massive debts the public is accumulating to bail out the speculators will then become part of a global budget crisis that will be the rationalization for deep cuts to social programs, and for a renewed push to privatize what is left of the public sector. We will also be told that our hopes for a green future are, sadly, too costly.

What we don't know is how the public will respond. Consider that in North America, everybody under the age of 40 grew up being told that the government can't intervene to improve our lives, that government is the problem not the solution, that laissez faire was the only option. Now, we are suddenly seeing an extremely activist, intensely interventionist government, seemingly willing to do whatever it takes to save investors from themselves.

This spectacle necessarily raises the question: if the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can't it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure? By the same token, if $85bn can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream? And if ever more corporations need taxpayer funds to stay afloat, why can't taxpayers make demands in return – like caps on executive pay, and a guarantee against more job losses?

Now that it's clear that governments can indeed act in times of crises, it will become much harder for them to plead powerlessness in the future. Another potential shift has to do with market hopes for future privatizations. For years, the global investment banks have been lobbying politicians for two new markets: one that would come from privatizing public pensions and the other that would come from a new wave of privatized or partially privatized roads, bridges and water systems. Both of these dreams have just become much harder to sell: Americans are in no mood to trust more of their individual and collective assets to the reckless gamblers on Wall Street, especially because it seems more than likely that taxpayers will have to pay to buy back their own assets when the next bubble bursts.

With the World Trade Organization talks off the rails, this crisis could also be a catalyst for a radically alternative approach to regulating world markets and financial systems. Already, we are seeing a move towards "food sovereignty" in the developing world, rather than leaving access to food to the whims of commodity traders. The time may finally have come for ideas like taxing trading, which would slow speculative investment, as well as other global capital controls.

And now that nationalization is not a dirty word, the oil and gas companies should watch out: someone needs to pay for the shift to a greener future, and it makes most sense for the bulk of the funds to come from the highly profitable sector that is most responsible for our climate crisis. It certainly makes more sense than creating another dangerous bubble in carbon trading.

But the crisis we are seeing calls for even deeper changes than that. The reason these junk loans were allowed to proliferate was not just because the regulators didn't understand the risk. It is because we have an economic system that measures our collective health based exclusively on GDP growth. So long as the junk loans were fuelling economic growth, our governments actively supported them. So what is really being called into question by the crisis is the unquestioned commitment to growth at all costs. Where this crisis should lead us is to a radically different way for our societies to measure health and progress.

None of this, however, will happen without huge public pressure placed on politicians in this key period. And not polite lobbying but a return to the streets and the kind of direct action that ushered in the New Deal in the 1930s. Without it, there will be superficial changes and a return, as quickly as possible, to business as usual.

[
  • #116,157
  • Sep 21, 2008 12:33am Sep 21, 2008 12:33am
I don't think we will ever use that number but it is good to know..




Quoting Obaidah
actually its googol, 1 followed by one hundred zero, or ten duotrigintillion, or ten thousand sexdecillion
[
  • #116,158
  • Sep 21, 2008 2:07am Sep 21, 2008 2:07am
Quoting rgitt05
I don't think we will ever use that number but it is good to know..

well, since you're interested we have a larger number its called googolplex, its number 1 followed by "googol zeros" ... or ten raised to the power of one googol 10^googol = 10^(10^100).
I recommend you read something else as this sentence is now concluded.
  • #116,159
  • Sep 21, 2008 8:07am Sep 21, 2008 8:07am
Quoting Dr.Geppynius
geht das jetzt so weiter?
nein
  • #116,160
  • Sep 21, 2008 8:35am Sep 21, 2008 8:35am
You watch ppl will be starting to take the mark of the beast, Bill Gates and his investment into nano technology will prevail amungst the ppl around the world. I would be very skeptical about getting any unsupervised operation.

maybe a bit paranoid, not sure why, like 1 or even 10 000 can influence any change of the times.

Prolly wise to just live life as normal and when it shows its face to you take a bullet and save your soul. I wonder how many have the conviction to stand and say just shoot me
"Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do"
110 traders viewing now