I had a 45 minute chat with a market maker broker in the UK last week and amongst other things this topic of server verses pc sided info was discussed. I asked him about the practice of sweeping the stops out and he gave some very good answers which I know personally to be true. This is a government licensed broker by the way. Anyway, one development was with the new platform soon to be out from metatrader, MT5. One of its features supposedly will be the ability to have an EA on the server side. Obviously I asked about security of the EA from prying eyes, but other than that, this would be a great benefit as I can see it, because it's a fact, if your PC goes on the blink, so does your exit if you have an open order. If you had the EA server sided, there would be no down time and therefore you could trade with the stops or whatever exit strategy desired, and the broker would never know your settings. But, personally, I don't believe a "reputable" broker sweeps stops. If they did, it would get noticed fairly quickly and ruin their reputation. what to speak of court cases.
The other point I would like to say is because there isn't a commission spread with the ECN broker, it seems the ECN is a little bit cheaper per trade, but not much. I have also sat and watched the market prices compare while trading for hours and they are usually the same with little delay. On top of this, the MM company I spoke to is aware of the ECN threat and they are working on a new deal for customers to tie in with MT5 that is like a semi ECN. The spread will reduce to 1 or less and the features of ECN will be all there, but just not straight to the interbank market due to the limitations of the metatrader platform. What do I care if I am getting the same service with less added cost of things like paying to have my money sent to me. It's free with the MM broker because I have a UK bank account. As others have said, ECN has it's merits, but its not by far as great as companies like MB Trading would have you believe. Yes, when I get into some big serious trading, I most likely will use ECN, but it won't be MB trading, that's for sure. They are the bucket shop of ECN brokers. To each their own, I just wanted to share some ideas. Well, that's all, happy trading!
The other point I would like to say is because there isn't a commission spread with the ECN broker, it seems the ECN is a little bit cheaper per trade, but not much. I have also sat and watched the market prices compare while trading for hours and they are usually the same with little delay. On top of this, the MM company I spoke to is aware of the ECN threat and they are working on a new deal for customers to tie in with MT5 that is like a semi ECN. The spread will reduce to 1 or less and the features of ECN will be all there, but just not straight to the interbank market due to the limitations of the metatrader platform. What do I care if I am getting the same service with less added cost of things like paying to have my money sent to me. It's free with the MM broker because I have a UK bank account. As others have said, ECN has it's merits, but its not by far as great as companies like MB Trading would have you believe. Yes, when I get into some big serious trading, I most likely will use ECN, but it won't be MB trading, that's for sure. They are the bucket shop of ECN brokers. To each their own, I just wanted to share some ideas. Well, that's all, happy trading!