trendchaser super ea | Page 77 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

trendchaser psar 268 replies

trendchaser ea's 137 replies

Question about "super micro accounts" 13 replies

Super Patterns 59 replies

Attachments: trendchaser super ea
Exit Attachments

trendchaser super ea

  • #1,521
  • Mar 29, 2008 9:59am Mar 29, 2008 9:59am
Quoting trendchaser
so u need another ass crack to add to the extract

whats the return on that per ounce
Seems I need to start a major fabric on that.
  • #1,522
  • Mar 29, 2008 10:14am Mar 29, 2008 10:14am
No problem...we have the Forex Factory....Satire intended


Quoting Gnat
Seems I need to start a major fabric on that.
  • #1,523
  • Mar 29, 2008 2:36pm Mar 29, 2008 2:36pm
Quoting nvwine
I sent you a PM.
Thanks
  • #1,524
  • Mar 29, 2008 11:40pm Mar 29, 2008 11:40pm
Quoting Xaron
What made me so angry isn't the funny fact about my "commercial" page but the fact that I didn't get any warning first...
Hi Xaron! The infraction you got was a warning infraction, the lethal kind would have you all faded out. Your site is considered commercial because it makes money from advertising. Just like Google, Yahoo!, and Forex Factory for that matter! I can see it's not a full-on commercial venture and if I could bend the rules I would do it for you! The problem we expereince when bending the rules is that real spammers will complain that "Everyone is doin' it!". I hope you can understand that man, just doin' my job no harsh feelings!
How can I help you? Send me a Private Message!
  • #1,525
  • Mar 29, 2008 11:57pm Mar 29, 2008 11:57pm
Quoting Twee
Hi Xaron! The infraction you got was a warning infraction, the lethal kind would have you all faded out. Your site is considered commercial because it makes money from advertising. Just like Google, Yahoo!, and Forex Factory for that matter! I can see it's not a full-on commercial venture and if I could bend the rules I would do it for you! The problem we expereince when bending the rules is that real spammers will complain that "Everyone is doin' it!". I hope you can understand that man, just doin' my job no harsh feelings!
Hey Twee

Care to comment on why Trendchaser was hit with an infraction?

His web site clearly states that donations are not required to obtain the EA. Seems rather harsh as smjones even saw fit to make a voluntary donation.
  • #1,526
  • Mar 30, 2008 1:22am Mar 30, 2008 1:22am
Hi Twee,

Do you realize that almost all websites that host people's information, etc has banners on them? There is nothing people can do about that because the webserver rents those add spaces out. Take your scenario of Yahoo and Google. When you register for an a Yahoo id or google id they are free profiles. How does registering for a free account at Yahoo or Google constitute a commercial enterprise. I really think you are taking this to the extreme. Just my opinion. No offence.

Jeff

Quoting Twee
Hi Xaron! The infraction you got was a warning infraction, the lethal kind would have you all faded out. Your site is considered commercial because it makes money from advertising. Just like Google, Yahoo!, and Forex Factory for that matter! I can see it's not a full-on commercial venture and if I could bend the rules I would do it for you! The problem we expereince when bending the rules is that real spammers will complain that "Everyone is doin' it!". I hope you can understand that man, just doin' my job no harsh feelings!
  • #1,527
  • Mar 30, 2008 3:11am Mar 30, 2008 3:11am
Twee...

I hope you read this and accept it as constructive.

I admire FF's attempts to prevent the exploitation of users by charlatans out to make a quick buck. However, in this case, you are imposing 'rules' based on strict black/white criteria when maybe shades of grey are more appropriate.

Trendchaser has devoted hundreds of hours to developing his system. He has never asked for monetary compensation and only added a 'donation' link after it was suggested by grateful users.

I don't personally use his EA's at this time but I find it very unsettling that his efforts are being undermined by bureaucratic minds that are hell-bent on imposing their rules.to the detriment of others.

Leave TC alone...he works his ass off and accepts, not demands, contributions.
  • #1,528
  • Edited 9:55am Mar 30, 2008 6:44am | Edited 9:55am
Quoting orion70
Hey Twee

Care to comment on why Trendchaser was hit with an infraction?

His web site clearly states that donations are not required to obtain the EA. Seems rather harsh as smjones even saw fit to make a voluntary donation.
Hi orion70,

When I donated to TC it was not because of anything in the thread. In fact at the time nothing was posted. I did it because I wanted to help another person. I did not even ask where or what his EA was, as I do not use it.

I felt it was ok for me to do this, because I am no longer a mod at FF. When TC decided to openly solicit to people that he had started his own forum, that kind of hurt, because the advertisement of that was directly against rule number 3 which states No Forum Promotion.

I like TC alot and have respect for his ability and his difficulties. The fact that He is not banned is proof that he only at most received a warning, so I do not understand why you would be upset. He himself admitted that he may be breaking the rules in several of his posts in this thread.

There really is no problem with this thread or with TC's standing here, because the fact is he is still here, as is the thread.

Trendchaser and I have had private email conversations and he understands my support for him. Really, I am perplexed why you would involve me in a discussion that you and I are not a part of. If I were Twee I would not respond to your request, because that would be a breech of privacy to another member. Of course I mean no offense.

kindest Regards, Scott
  • #1,529
  • Mar 30, 2008 9:40am Mar 30, 2008 9:40am
toooo late tweedletwee....

You lost a good thread here....I suggest you consider a FF without Talent...then you will see what I am bringing to light.

go back to your Doll House and make up some more rules as you go...hey! Rule # 4 says you can do that...lol

ES
  • #1,530
  • Apr 2, 2008 5:35pm Apr 2, 2008 5:35pm
........ you have really come a long way with this EA and there are many that admire your work. I for one am very grateful to you for your hard work to help others here. IMO ... Craig will give you an invite to his Group, I do hope you will accept as we are all anticipating your arrival. Please accept the invite. thanks!
  • #1,531
  • Apr 3, 2008 3:37am Apr 3, 2008 3:37am
Hey Max hows it going in The Zone?

BTW, TC EA v9.1 and v32 are like the sogn goes; just too good to be true on UJ and EJ - at least in my experience (Live tests with penny lots)
  • #1,532
  • Apr 4, 2008 5:35am Apr 4, 2008 5:35am
hi don with with broker you have try super ea wot these pairs
  • #1,533
  • Apr 4, 2008 7:07am Apr 4, 2008 7:07am
sorry don for so much wrong typing in my previous post . i was asking if you did the test with many brokers or only ibfx . and witch version has more draw down v9.1 or v32 . thanks
  • #1,534
  • Apr 4, 2008 11:57am Apr 4, 2008 11:57am
just wondered when trying this out if breakeven should be true,hidden stop loss should be true, hidden take profit true, and trail should be true? or should they all be false like they are??
  • #1,535
  • Apr 4, 2008 12:41pm Apr 4, 2008 12:41pm
nope just defaults

Quoting rbrtsha
just wondered when trying this out if breakeven should be true,hidden stop loss should be true, hidden take profit true, and trail should be true? or should they all be false like they are??
  • #1,536
  • Apr 7, 2008 9:40pm Apr 7, 2008 9:40pm
where is every1 ?

im still here
  • #1,537
  • Apr 8, 2008 1:53am Apr 8, 2008 1:53am
Me too!
  • #1,538
  • Apr 8, 2008 2:39am Apr 8, 2008 2:39am
Yeah TC...I am here too...why don't you give us some "FF approved" grail-work to test..hehe

ES
  • #1,539
  • Apr 8, 2008 3:22am Apr 8, 2008 3:22am
Quoting trendchaser
where is every1 ?

im still here
Most of us are trying out the new EAs! It is hard to post when my old surfing computer is using over a meg of ram just for the optimization. It is too slow.

I really like the EMA versions. I'm still testing and tuning the 3.1 version. It has potential. I know you don't like back testing and we all know back testing has been proven suspect. But it is hard to ignore how well the current versions are doing on back tests. To show the maxed potential gains I'll throw one screen shot of the a v3.1 running on barley wine. This back test started on January 1st, 2006 and ran until about the end of last month. I started with $2,500.00 and you can see where it went. I will use less than half the risk if I test it on a live account but even at half the earnings the EA is doing well. This test is on the EURUSD, 60Min time frame, running 27 months, testing ticks at 90%, Alpari stitched to IBFX on Jan 26th, 2008. Further testing live with 1 cent pips will determine if these results are possible.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: TC_Super_EMA_v3-1_27-Month.gif Size: 21 KB
  • #1,540
  • Apr 8, 2008 4:23am Apr 8, 2008 4:23am
Quoting nvwine
Most of us are trying out the new EAs! It is hard to post when my old surfing computer is using over a meg of ram just for the optimization. It is too slow.

I really like the EMA versions. I'm still testing and tuning the 3.1 version. It has potential. I know you don't like back testing and we all know back testing has been proven suspect. But it is hard to ignore how well the current versions are doing on back tests. To show the maxed potential gains I'll throw one screen shot of the a v3.1 running on barley wine. This back test started on January 1st, 2006 and ran until about the end of last month. I started with $2,500.00 and you can see where it went. I will use less than half the risk if I test it on a live account but even at half the earnings the EA is doing well. This test is on the EURUSD, 60Min time frame, running 27 months, testing ticks at 90%, Alpari stitched to IBFX on Jan 26th, 2008. Further testing live with 1 cent pips will determine if these results are possible.
I revitalized an old Optiplex sitting in a file cabinet yesterday evening and set up a two demo's to test the 9.2 and the EMA 3.1! Both are performing nicely with the 9.2 trailing like the big brother 34.1 making enormous gains on the GBPJPY and the EMA3.1 running on ten pairs resulting in 5.110,- in equity after starting at 5.000,- last night (18 hours of demo only).
The backtests really are impressive and with the EA taking trades only on candle closes/openings the test should be closer to the truth than with EAs taking trades within the candle.
I have very little problems to test it live now and the risk is a good deal lower than with the superEA family, although my darling is the 9.2!!

Greetz!
Gnat
0 traders viewing now