Dislikedit is changing to a invalid size
ok lets say its starting at 0.1, then it advances to 0.11
but ur broker dont allow that, u need 0.2Ignored
trendchaser psar 268 replies
trendchaser ea's 137 replies
Question about "super micro accounts" 13 replies
Super Patterns 59 replies
Dislikedit is changing to a invalid size
ok lets say its starting at 0.1, then it advances to 0.11
but ur broker dont allow that, u need 0.2Ignored
Dislikedok and this error message theorically would pop up once all trade are closed isn't it ? so i can take time to modify settings ?
...i'll run more tests to see how it behaves with 0.2 lots on a 11000 balance...
thanks TCIgnored
Dislikedi hope my last post dont keep u from posting
im just trying to slow down the emails and pm and yahoo's
last thing i wanna do is slow down the thread
this is where we keep to businessIgnored
Dislikedare you sure you can set 0.001 lots ? I thought the smallest we can trade ever was 0.1...error 131 means lot size forbiden...(by your broker)Ignored
Dislikedheheno not at all, I sent u meantime 10 PMs and 5 emails full of love hugz and kisses , pleas for ur source code, enquiries about the color of your eyes,the size of ur underwear, your favorite cereals....and all other essentials
I would like to deploy some of your EAs live on a nano accounts each funded with lets say a 100$.
But when am backtesting it(100$) v18,19,22,25,9.1 am gettin:
Journal:
2008.03.22 15:28:55 2008.01.30 18:48 trendchaser_super_ea_v25 GBPJPY,M5: OrderSend error 131
from error codes:
ERR_INVALID_TRADE_VOLUME 131 Invalid trade volume.
I do set manually Balance param to 100 and change Lots param to .001 (if left unchanged it just wipes the acc in a while).
How to adjust it to NANO?
thxIgnored
Dislikedare you sure you can set 0.001 lots ? I thought the smallest we can trade ever was 0.01...error 131 means lot size forbiden...(by your broker)Ignored
Dislikedthats so weird
iv been overflooded for days
now sudenly its dead
not 1 email or pm or yahoo in over a hr
theres not even many ppl on this thread
i guess its xcoincidenceIgnored
Dislikedu r obviously missing it![]()
in fact u liked it in some weird way....
and u threw it all awayIgnored