trendchaser super ea | Page 51 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

trendchaser psar 268 replies

trendchaser ea's 137 replies

Question about "super micro accounts" 13 replies

Super Patterns 59 replies

Attachments: trendchaser super ea
Exit Attachments

trendchaser super ea

  • #1,001
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:05am Mar 20, 2008 11:05am
but is it normal i had 4 buys ? You said i should have only sells
  • #1,002
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:08am Mar 20, 2008 11:08am
at 10k the ea is betting 0.1 anyway
  • #1,003
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:09am Mar 20, 2008 11:09am
its normal for your broker

the data is diferent, so the indicators are diferent to
m30 psar was hit

Quoting Alex84
but is it normal i had 4 buys ? You said i should have only sells
  • #1,004
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:11am Mar 20, 2008 11:11am
your 200 ema is very diferent, did u set it to exponential
  • #1,005
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:13am Mar 20, 2008 11:13am
Quoting trendchaser
tell u what alex, start over, reset the demo, open a ibfx at same time with same balance

when you go negative 10-20% on mig
youl see ibfx is down 1-2%

mig will get wiped out but ibfx will make money
ok so i open 2 accts with 10.000 balance each, i modify my set file to 0.1 lot and i'll see
  • #1,006
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:14am Mar 20, 2008 11:14am
Quoting trendchaser
your 200 ema is very diferent, did u set it to exponential
yes...
  • #1,007
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:19am Mar 20, 2008 11:19am
is it possible i don't have the same indies than you or not all of them ?
  • #1,008
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:19am Mar 20, 2008 11:19am
modify both the same so u know theres no diference other than broker


Quoting Alex84
ok so i open 2 accts with 10.000 balance each, i modify my set file to 0.1 lot and i'll see
  • #1,009
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:20am Mar 20, 2008 11:20am
the ea trades with the parabolic sar built into mt4

the custom indy is for looks
it has nothing to do with trades


Quoting Alex84
is it possible i don't have the same indies than you or not all of them ?
  • #1,010
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:22am Mar 20, 2008 11:22am
ok lets go...ill just modify lots to 0.1
  • #1,011
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:22am Mar 20, 2008 11:22am
the ea doesnt use any custom indies

all standard
  • #1,012
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:23am Mar 20, 2008 11:23am
Is this just a glitch of the mt4 tester or a possible real life scenario?

Detailed statement attached
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: wipe out GJ 30m.PNG Size: 55 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: zip wipe out GJ 30m.zip   60 KB | 244 downloads
  • #1,013
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:25am Mar 20, 2008 11:25am
Quoting trendchaser
the ea doesnt use any custom indies

all standard
that s what i understood earlier...but i was starting to wondering...
arrrrrrgh Damn MIG !!!
  • #1,014
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:27am Mar 20, 2008 11:27am
Quoting frito
Is this just a glitch of the mt4 tester or a possible real life scenario?

Detailed statement attached
ea is to use on 5M so your test is not good i guess
  • #1,015
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:31am Mar 20, 2008 11:31am
that could happen
we dont run m5 unattended
h1 is the safe setting

you should also test on m5

Quoting frito
Is this just a glitch of the mt4 tester or a possible real life scenario?

Detailed statement attached
  • #1,016
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:34am Mar 20, 2008 11:34am
if i even suspect that price will range that it keeps hitting the m30 psar, we switch to h1

Quoting frito
Is this just a glitch of the mt4 tester or a possible real life scenario?

Detailed statement attached
  • #1,017
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:38am Mar 20, 2008 11:38am
however, the test is very inaccurate

the chart below shows where psar realy hit

ea woulda won
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: now2.gif Size: 21 KB
  • #1,018
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:52am Mar 20, 2008 11:52am
Quoting trendchaser
that could happen
we dont run m5 unattended
h1 is the safe setting

you should also test on m5
5m should NOT be unattended, roger .

I tested v18 on 5m on about 3.5 months of minute data with different settings, it performed nicely without any disaster.

I tested v16 on the "WIPE OUT" interval with the same settings (30m, psar .003...) and no disaster occured.
  • #1,019
  • Mar 20, 2008 11:59am Mar 20, 2008 11:59am
i got good results when i tested, but going back to 2004 didnt make it, i dont know if the test is reliable

h1 made it

i dont mean u gotta sit here n watch it
but check it once or twice a day

theres like 1 special size range that can mess us up

bouncing up n down repeatedly hitting m30 psar
hedge after hedge with big pips inbetween

Quoting frito
5m should NOT be unattended, roger .

I tested v18 on 5m on about 3.5 months of minute data with different settings, it performed nicely without any disaster.

I tested v16 on the "WIPE OUT" interval with the same settings (30m, psar .003...) and no disaster occured.
  • #1,020
  • Mar 20, 2008 12:12pm Mar 20, 2008 12:12pm
Quoting Alex84
ok lets go...ill just modify lots to 0.1
TC-

Can you please educate me on parameters of MM settings of EA and how it affects?

Is there a schedule description of the settings that you can direct me to?

I've decided to demo with a $1000 acct for a week or two before going live to make sure the settings are good.

Please let me know if the following make since.

I'll be using IBFX

lot size = .01 -- since i'll be trading micros
mm calculation = 1000 -- since starting capital is $1000

....

Will the EA adjust to the growing trading capital or must one adjust it manually? I noticed that I left everything default works on a 50k acct but maybe it was just that I'm lucky LOL.

Appreciate everything you do!

Thanks,
Jonathon
0 traders viewing now