Is This My Holy Grail EA :D | Page 2 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

The HOLY GRAIL 130 replies

Developing the "Holy Grail" Trading System 4 replies

Holy grail trading system wanted, or nearest thing to it! 43 replies

6 Steps To Finding Your Personal Holy Grail 6 replies

The Search for the Holy Grail 1 reply

Attachments: Is This My Holy Grail EA :D
Exit Attachments

Is This My Holy Grail EA :D

  • #21
  • Edited 2:32am Dec 10, 2007 2:31am | Edited 2:32am
@ all,

When i want to load this 10 points 3 mq4-file into my mt4-account, it´s always removed immediately.
I have copied it into the mt4-folder /experts/indicators, but it doesnt´work.
Can somebody give me advice please ?
Don´t live for working, but work for living.
  • #22
  • Dec 10, 2007 4:40am Dec 10, 2007 4:40am
Quoting matsf
@ all,

When i want to load this 10 points 3 mq4-file into my mt4-account, it´s always removed immediately.
I have copied it into the mt4-folder /experts/indicators, but it doesnt´work.
Can somebody give me advice please ?
you must put it in MT4 folder/expert/ okes....then it will work ......
  • #23
  • Dec 10, 2007 4:45am Dec 10, 2007 4:45am
But there is no folder named okes ???
Don´t live for working, but work for living.
  • #24
  • Dec 10, 2007 5:06am Dec 10, 2007 5:06am
Try to test your EA forwardly. I´m sure the results, it will be shocking...
Trainee at UBS Investment Banking
  • #25
  • Dec 10, 2007 5:11am Dec 10, 2007 5:11am
Quoting th_ngue21
Try to test your EA forwardly. I´m sure the results, it will be shocking...
i live it today on my 100usd micro account litefx hehehe...we just wait n see .. ok...
  • #26
  • Dec 10, 2007 5:12am Dec 10, 2007 5:12am
Quoting matsf
But there is no folder named okes ???
hehehe... of course there is no folder named "okes" ...put it in "MT4 flder/expert "

hehehe...the "okes" word means OK
  • #27
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:17am Dec 10, 2007 6:17am
Finally i got it. okes
Thx azam575
Don´t live for working, but work for living.
  • #28
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:20am Dec 10, 2007 6:20am
OK here it is 90% modellling quality

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/2...tillnowcm6.gif
  • #29
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:21am Dec 10, 2007 6:21am
Quoting matsf
Finally i got it. okes
Thx azam575
nice MATSF ... now please bactesting it for me ok....
  • #30
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:26am Dec 10, 2007 6:26am
Quoting azam575
OK here it is 90% modellling quality

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/2...tillnowcm6.gif
Could you post the detail of this test. I wanted to look at the trades after 32 on the x coordinate? Looks impressive.
  • #31
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:27am Dec 10, 2007 6:27am
Come on.
One step after the other... :-)
I´m not too familiar with EA´s, so i have to begin to learn it first of all.
:-)
Don´t live for working, but work for living.
  • #32
  • Dec 10, 2007 6:29am Dec 10, 2007 6:29am
this looks pretty sexy i must say, but martingale are bad for any account usually
  • #33
  • Dec 10, 2007 8:06am Dec 10, 2007 8:06am
Quoting smjones
Could you post the detail of this test. I wanted to look at the trades after 32 on the x coordinate? Looks impressive.
ok....take a look at detail statements ....thanks for your comment SMJONES...
Attached File(s)
File Type: zip GU_1okt till now.zip   4 KB | 1,256 downloads
  • #34
  • Dec 10, 2007 8:34am Dec 10, 2007 8:34am
Quoting azam575
ok....take a look at detail statements ....thanks for your comment SMJONES...
I looked thru your trades and one thing stands out right away... BTW you have done a great job here. It is very impressive. Take a look at the time period you ran your test from October, to December. This was pretty good area to test for GU on a hour timeframe, because there were strong up trends and strong down trends and a choppy spell. The test looks pretty good, but have you tested it longer term? also, have you tested it on other pairs. What would be a good sign is if the EA produced similar results on different pairs. That would help to dispel the idea that it is curve fitting to the pair and to the time.

Of course forward testing will help with that.. If you really want to use the help of other members to the best advantage, I think you would be wise to ask each person that wants to test this to choose a unique pair and then assign this pair to that individual so that you can have many different pairs tested independently, without the bias of having one person unknowingly curve fit the data.
  • #35
  • Dec 10, 2007 9:03am Dec 10, 2007 9:03am
Quoting smjones
I looked thru your trades and one thing stands out right away... BTW you have done a great job here. It is very impressive. Take a look at the time period you ran your test from October, to December. This was pretty good area to test for GU on a hour timeframe, because there were strong up trends and strong down trends and a choppy spell. The test looks pretty good, but have you tested it longer term? also, have you tested it on other pairs. What would be a good sign is if the EA produced similar results on different pairs. That would help to dispel the idea that it is curve fitting to the pair and to the time.

Of course forward testing will help with that.. If you really want to use the help of other members to the best advantage, I think you would be wise to ask each person that wants to test this to choose a unique pair and then assign this pair to that individual so that you can have many different pairs tested independently, without the bias of having one person unknowingly curve fit the data.
Thanks for your comments SMJONES...nice...erm.... i like your idea of backtesting it on other pair. But i think other pair need different value of BUY n SELL signal ...you know why right?
  • #36
  • Dec 10, 2007 9:06am Dec 10, 2007 9:06am
Quoting azam575
Thanks for your comments SMJONES...nice...erm.... i like your idea of backtesting it on other pair. But i think other pair need different value of BUY n SELL signal ...you know why right?
Yes, LOL
  • #37
  • Dec 10, 2007 9:12am Dec 10, 2007 9:12am
Quoting smjones
I looked thru your trades and one thing stands out right away... BTW you have done a great job here. It is very impressive. Take a look at the time period you ran your test from October, to December. This was pretty good area to test for GU on a hour timeframe, because there were strong up trends and strong down trends and a choppy spell. The test looks pretty good, but have you tested it longer term? also, have you tested it on other pairs. What would be a good sign is if the EA produced similar results on different pairs. That would help to dispel the idea that it is curve fitting to the pair and to the time.

Of course forward testing will help with that.. If you really want to use the help of other members to the best advantage, I think you would be wise to ask each person that wants to test this to choose a unique pair and then assign this pair to that individual so that you can have many different pairs tested independently, without the bias of having one person unknowingly curve fit the data.
My work PC can run a pair for sure, i would gladly participate
  • #38
  • Dec 10, 2007 9:44am Dec 10, 2007 9:44am
Quoting melpheos
My work PC can run a pair for sure, i would gladly participate
Thanks MELPHEOS...the ea at 1st page .....
  • #39
  • Dec 10, 2007 11:02am Dec 10, 2007 11:02am
hehehe...1st profit

capital: 100usd(10000 cent)
broker: litefx

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/2...tprofithr6.png
  • #40
  • Dec 10, 2007 11:04am Dec 10, 2007 11:04am
Quoting azam575
Thanks MELPHEOS...the ea at 1st page .....
This EA seems to have different parameters then the one you showed as a test. I cannot not find the input variable sq, L=, H=, and many of the other variables have different strings in them. Is this to be run as is, or is there a list of settings that can be selected from?
0 traders viewing now