Supernova GBP/JPY Mini Trend Catcher | Page 158 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Forex Trend Catcher EA 721 replies

trend catcher fib ea 5 replies

Early Trend Catcher Part2 46 replies

Early Trend Catcher 31 replies

Trend Catcher 5 replies

Attachments: Supernova GBP/JPY Mini Trend Catcher
Exit Attachments

Supernova GBP/JPY Mini Trend Catcher

  • #3,141
  • Nov 24, 2007 8:46am Nov 24, 2007 8:46am
Quoting Nofx
Sounds good - I will be gone for a good portion of the morning tomorrow (my morning PST)

I am taking the eggs sledding.

Good evening to you,

Dogdog
OK... unfortunately there is no snow here, but I have just ended a LOUD birthdays party for my daughter (turning 9) and a flock of other seagulls! Now I am deaf and dumb and blind like Thommy (The Who).
Will be around my night and your midday to evening and then we can look at the EA with the bees humming.

Ciao
GMatt
  • #3,142
  • Nov 24, 2007 9:27am Nov 24, 2007 9:27am
Quoting orion70
Having a graduate degree in information systems technology, 19+ years of experience and an MCSE designation, I'll strive to improve on the "little knowledge" I possess.
that was directed at no-one person but everyone in general.

I am sorry orion70 if you took my post as derogatory towards your advise but it was not intended that way
Don't chase the market, Let the market come to you
  • #3,143
  • Nov 24, 2007 8:41pm Nov 24, 2007 8:41pm
Hi Trendchaser,

Just got back from the in-laws, so sorry it took me so long to respond to you PM. FF is being unco-operative with my reply, so I have to reply here.

I will take a look at the code and see what needs to be done. We'll get it working, I'm certain. I will start on it tomorrow after I have recovered somewhat from the in-law visit.

Rick
  • #3,144
  • Nov 25, 2007 2:33am Nov 25, 2007 2:33am
Quoting Tmac
that was directed at no-one person but everyone in general.

I am sorry orion70 if you took my post as derogatory towards your advise but it was not intended that way
no problem...misunderstandings happen when dealing with text only.
  • #3,145
  • Nov 25, 2007 4:43am Nov 25, 2007 4:43am
Quoting Tmac
that was directed at no-one person but everyone in general.

I am sorry orion70 if you took my post as derogatory towards your advise but it was not intended that way
Thanks for setting that straight! Keeps the good mood on here.
Have a good weekend both of you and it is always good to communicate! :
  • #3,146
  • Nov 25, 2007 6:13am Nov 25, 2007 6:13am
Hi Trendchaser,

I took a look at the code in beta 5. Things are not as dire as you think

Having tried all the beta's, I would like to suggest that if you have the original beta 2 source that we start with that as it worked well. What we should do is first clean up that code, then add in your newer ideas. There are several places where we can greatly cut down on the amount of code in there, plus there are a few techniques that we can apply to speed up backtesting considerably.

As I said, it really just needs a bit of structure and cleaning up and then it will be much easier to add new functionality.

Rick
  • #3,147
  • Nov 25, 2007 8:00am Nov 25, 2007 8:00am
thats exactly what it needs rick
i just dont know the more efficient way to code
i have all versions


Quoting rmyers
Hi Trendchaser,

I took a look at the code in beta 5. Things are not as dire as you think

Having tried all the beta's, I would like to suggest that if you have the original beta 2 source that we start with that as it worked well. What we should do is first clean up that code, then add in your newer ideas. There are several places where we can greatly cut down on the amount of code in there, plus there are a few techniques that we can apply to speed up backtesting considerably.

As I said, it really just needs a bit of structure and cleaning up and then it will be much easier to add new functionality.

Rick
  • #3,148
  • Nov 25, 2007 10:31am Nov 25, 2007 10:31am
Quoting rmyers
Hi Trendchaser,

I took a look at the code in beta 5. Things are not as dire as you think

Having tried all the beta's, I would like to suggest that if you have the original beta 2 source that we start with that as it worked well. What we should do is first clean up that code, then add in your newer ideas. There are several places where we can greatly cut down on the amount of code in there, plus there are a few techniques that we can apply to speed up backtesting considerably.

As I said, it really just needs a bit of structure and cleaning up and then it will be much easier to add new functionality.

Rick
I think this got wayyyyy to complicated with all the indicators and no EA will ever work well if they need so many comfirmations to function, hell the original method works and works well manual and so should the EA, maybe , maybe a filter but not 4 or 5 that it ended up with

this is just MHO and as such it may not be worth a pip
Don't chase the market, Let the market come to you
  • #3,149
  • Nov 25, 2007 11:30am Nov 25, 2007 11:30am
Hey Dogster!

Needed to take my boys out to town today to give Marina a break. She will be alright, but she looks like a demon ... well you can tell!
I am really worn out, but I am putting some things together to give you a good start. Will send it all in an Email and inclucde the little wizardry! Fortunately Qpip has found the way back from the jungle and it seems we may resume with fresh wind!

Enjoy your weekend - must have been better than mine by far!
Greetz!
GMatt
  • #3,150
  • Nov 25, 2007 11:31am Nov 25, 2007 11:31am
Quoting trendchaser
thats exactly what it needs rick
i just dont know the more efficient way to code
i have all versions
Sounds you 2 are off to something now. Happy that you get started!
  • #3,151
  • Nov 25, 2007 3:37pm Nov 25, 2007 3:37pm
the ea were talking about is based on the original
it has 4 indicators as per the first, and thats all
which method are you using that has less than 4 filters thats working?

Quoting Tmac
I think this got wayyyyy to complicated with all the indicators and no EA will ever work well if they need so many comfirmations to function, hell the original method works and works well manual and so should the EA, maybe , maybe a filter but not 4 or 5 that it ended up with

this is just MHO and as such it may not be worth a pip
  • #3,152
  • Nov 25, 2007 7:23pm Nov 25, 2007 7:23pm
Wow! I have just finished two days of straight reading of all the posts on this thread! Awesome work! Kudos to all!

I have been looking for a system to use as I migrate from stocks to FOREX and have read several threads on FF searching for a logical methodical common sense approach to trading. After spending a couple of weeks searching I have found one that not only makes sense, but the people that are using it are open and receptive to inputs! Now that is the type of system I am looking for! Teach a man how to fish... you know...

Your system rocks and I am looking forward to using it as I migrate into the world of pips!

Thanks to all for the generousity, openness, and the freedom exercised within this forum! I hope I can contribute in the near future in some small way!

Best Regards,
Dave
  • #3,153
  • Nov 26, 2007 1:25am Nov 26, 2007 1:25am
Quoting entropy
Wow! I have just finished two days of straight reading of all the posts on this thread! Awesome work! Kudos to all!

I have been looking for a system to use as I migrate from stocks to FOREX and have read several threads on FF searching for a logical methodical common sense approach to trading. After spending a couple of weeks searching I have found one that not only makes sense, but the people that are using it are open and receptive to inputs! Now that is the type of system I am looking for! Teach a man how to fish... you know...

Your system rocks and I am looking forward to using it as I migrate into the world of pips!

Thanks to all for the generousity, openness, and the freedom exercised within this forum! I hope I can contribute in the near future in some small way!

Best Regards,
Dave
Hello Dave!

Welcome to the Supernova show. Glad you enjoyed the monumental task of reading the thread. Hope the things you learned will help you find some success in forex.

Good trading,

NOFX
  • #3,154
  • Nov 26, 2007 2:40am Nov 26, 2007 2:40am
Trendchaser....

Your psar EA continues to perform well. I am tempted to go live with it.
  • #3,155
  • Nov 26, 2007 2:43am Nov 26, 2007 2:43am
Quoting orion70
Trendchaser....

Your psar EA continues to perform well. I am tempted to go live with it.
Hey Orion, have you posted results for this EA, if not I would love to see them. Thanks....
  • #3,156
  • Nov 26, 2007 2:48am Nov 26, 2007 2:48am
Quoting wolfeman
Hey Orion, have you posted results for this EA, if not I would love to see them. Thanks....
I have not but I will start keeping track of the results. I usually open a new demo account everytime a new version comes out.

Loaded the newest version over the weekend and started it about 6 hours ago, up 68 pips with three open trades
  • #3,157
  • Nov 26, 2007 5:57am Nov 26, 2007 5:57am
Quoting entropy
Wow! I have just finished two days of straight reading of all the posts on this thread! Awesome work! Kudos to all!

I have been looking for a system to use as I migrate from stocks to FOREX and have read several threads on FF searching for a logical methodical common sense approach to trading. After spending a couple of weeks searching I have found one that not only makes sense, but the people that are using it are open and receptive to inputs! Now that is the type of system I am looking for! Teach a man how to fish... you know...

Your system rocks and I am looking forward to using it as I migrate into the world of pips!

Thanks to all for the generousity, openness, and the freedom exercised within this forum! I hope I can contribute in the near future in some small way!

Best Regards,
Dave
Hi Dave!

Thanks you for this kind opener! Hope you will feel at home here and make some nice pips. I guess starting on the manual side of this moon is helping to get the impact of the system. Then later on one of the various EA's may be used alongside this.
Welcome on board!

Ciao
Gnat
  • #3,158
  • Nov 26, 2007 6:09am Nov 26, 2007 6:09am
well scalped 10 pips or plus £44 this morning on Eur/Jpy would have gone for more but I realised in trade I went for 1 lot instead of 0.10!
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: pips.JPG Size: 11 KB
  • #3,159
  • Nov 26, 2007 6:12am Nov 26, 2007 6:12am
Actually I need to contact Alpari I have no idea how they are pricing my pips, definitely not the same as CMS
  • #3,160
  • Nov 26, 2007 6:15am Nov 26, 2007 6:15am
Hey Gnat!

Hope all is well - I may have to go for a nap here soon before the Dragon roars. So a little clarification in the hive from me. Talk to you soon.

Dogmaster Smack
25 traders viewing now