Supernova GBP/JPY Mini Trend Catcher

Quoting sai_saphire

Disliked

Very good work, You are he most active EA programmer that I ever know. , i have question about the EA.
1. Is the EA entry with Laguerre Rules from Imransait?
2. I've try your previous version EA (1.4) but when the EA try to entry the EA give message that "we don't have enough money", I try the EA in demo account with equity 50,000. Is there something I miss?

Thanks Skyline...

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

Thx sai_saphire

1) Yes if you enable it with EntryOnLaguerre flag
2) That's strange , check if you didn't use a risk too much high (more than 20)

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

Hi all
here you can find new version with following changes :

- Added AllowReEntry. If set to true EA will re-entry after a trade otherwise it will not reentry until a new QQE cross will appear.

- Added timeframe in comment whenever a trade is placed.

Pls test it in demo account and report here possible issue

Thx

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting matrixebiz

Disliked

Thank you Syline, but I was thinking that maybe MagicNumber would be better than just TimeFrame Comment because what if I want to run the same currency, same TimeFrame but different settings comparing the different settings with same TimeFrame. Sorry

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

I'm sorry Matrix, but in that case EA will assign the same MagicNumber for both EA and orders will become crazy. In that case the only thing to do is to set MagicNumber manually but actually there's no such function available.

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting sai_saphire

Disliked

i use 2% risk.. All set default.. Now i use v1.5
This is the message when I try with strategy tester.:
2007.11.04 19:08:07 2007.09.26 00:45 Tester: PrevBalance: 50000.00, PrevPL: 0.00, PrevEquity 50000.00, PrevMargin: 0.00, NewMargin: 208925, FreeMargin: -158925.00

2007.11.04 19:08:07 2007.09.26 00:45 SuperNova EA (Glenn) v1.5 GBPJPY,M5: Errore BUY (134) : not enough money



Your previous EA before 1.4 work fine...

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

That's strange I backtested the whole day with 10000$ starting account and never experienced something like that :surprised Did you try to backtest with different broker ? (I'm backtesting using Fastbrokers)

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting matrixebiz

Disliked

Ok, no problem. Maybe next release to have an option for Manual MagicNumber of you enable

Also, I edited my post above;
"Can I put MaxShiftFromQQEcross=0 if I don't want to use that feature?
and about AllowReEntry=False but I don't even want another trade to start with next QQE cross until the previous order is closed. Will this still work?"

Ignored

Quoting matrixebiz

Disliked

Ok, great, thank you. So if AllowReEntry=True then EA WILL open another trade if indicators agree before previous order isn't closed yet, correct? If False then previous order needs to be closed no matter what, correct? Your the best
All you guys are great This is the first EA I've used where I have full control over entry and exits
Thank you for this great system

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

No Matrix , you'll have only 1 order opened for each EA at the same time regardless how is set AllowReEntry flag

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

I'm sorry Matrix, but in that case EA will assign the same MagicNumber for both EA and orders will become crazy. In that case the only thing to do is to set MagicNumber manually but actually there's no such function available.

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

Hi all
here you can find new version with following changes :

- Added AllowReEntry. If set to true EA will re-entry after a trade otherwise it will not reentry until a new QQE cross will appear.

- Added timeframe in comment whenever a trade is placed.

Pls test it in demo account and report here possible issue

Thx

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting sai_saphire

Disliked

Now it work, thanks, i have changed broker to skyeast..

Ignored

Quoting matrixebiz

Disliked

Oh Ok, I must have misunderstood what the re-entry thing was about.
Please enlighten me again. I'm doing a test right now where I have once a trade closes I do want another trade to open immediately after if conditions are met. So should I set to TRUE then? Like see pic. I want the previous trade to close (Red) then another trade to open right after (Green) because I'm getting a reverse condition of Sell from previous trade which was a buy.
Thank you

Ignored

Quoting Gnat

Disliked

OMG
Yet another version!
I figure Skyline sitting with his pizza and vino coding away like a beserk, while the wine is getting too warm and the pizza is getting really cold!! (I learned very early that he needs to eat and drink! LOL)

Great work there guys and another victim to tie to the tester! v1.4 was testing really slow - is that a coincident sky, or is it getting too complex to test fast? I just clearly see the difference and it is done on the same computer.

So switchable entry and re-entry gives way to a complete new approach with fixed TPs. Then the EA would manage the trendtrade like a gridtrader - only that the entrypoints of the grid are not all known (but the grid will never be too large!!) This is something special indeed!

Thanks Glenn and Sky!
Greetz from Hamburg
Gnat

Ignored

Quoting skyline

Disliked

Matrix, when we talk about re-entry we are referring to the same direction of trade. It happens when after first trade is triggered and closed (a buy for example) then another buy is triggered if conditions are still met. This will lead to a lot of re-entries before a short condition is available and could lead to blow account (or to big wins). So setting AllowReEntry to true you will accept that EA will re-enter in the same direction after a closed trade, otherwise EA will wait until reversal will occur (if it was a buy it will wait for a sell and viceversa).
Hope this clear your doubt

Skyline

Ignored

Quoting matrixebiz

Disliked

Ok thanks.

Question regarding the Laguerre ind and trading. For the EA to trade according to the Laguerre signal it knows when the indicator is still in the same direction and just further than the trigger signal, correct?

EG: when the Lag indicator is set to buy when coming from bottom and hits 0.15, if the other indicators aren't ready yet until a little later, if Lag is higher now when the other indicators agree, like up now to 0.45, the EA would still make that trade know that the lag indicator is still in the upward direction, correct? Lag doesn't have to be exactly at 0.15, correct?

Ignored