The problem I have with unloading 1/2 position at a given amount of pips, say 50 for example, is that the the pips LEFT are ALSO only worth 1/2 $ now, so they need to do 2 X the amount of pips to get the same $ worth as the original 50 (so they need to go up 100 for a total move of 150). Apart from GBPJPY I don't know if it isn't more profitable to just get out after 50 (or whatever number suits your fancy)
And then use the ATM to withdrawal your money..... Arghhhhhhh
I am totally not following you guys on these machine things, as I don't use them myself I guess.
But I really like cryten's "break & butter bot" pic LOLLLLLL
Am "human coding" for triple wednesday to send to H who will experty "machine code" this really nice cashy thing.
... and break & butter completely slipped my vision... 
Nite Nat,
(break & butter, there's probably a subconscious something there.....)
See ya tou-mo-ra, I ain't workin' la la la la al al alala lalal al <--- this is a song
This thing you do...... saying good-night....... and then sticking around..... this behaviour........... you ARE really a fly:
: - so there is WLAN and also a nice computer already. Still I would not really have too much time, because of the kids.Pipsy and Gentlemen!
What are we going to do this weekend? We would need the QQEA inside the EA from my humble point of view - otherwise it may be a bit complicated to test the QQEA. Well, one could also set both sides: EA and QQEA.
From my point of view there is a very good chance to positively optimize the concept on the longer timeframes and make it ready for the use of real real money (no typo) in a short time.
While Finnfx has used the QQEA to rather slow down the process of decisionmaking for the manual traders, which is a valid attempt there, we would need to make the reactiontime of the 4H and above TFs much shorter. Especially on exits it is crucial to get the trade reversed in a much more timely manner.
This would lead to approximate 30-50% higher profit on the 4H and daily and would at least lead me to confidence to go in there with good sized lots. But before I apply my potatoe-sack to the russian cahsmachine, I'd rather wann know, if it is standing the test of "past" time. Also test on 1 - 1.5 years may be good then, although markets have changed. If the test are positive, we know that the system is not so nervous to get wrong as ATR and other circumstances change.
If noone really has time this weekend, I would be driving up to my island today and stay there for the weekend. It is not that I am completely off the hook there - I can bring my laptop(s) up there and my parents were forced by an unknown Fly to install DSL lately...
Let me have a little feedback here! Thanks!
(I do not need to go there - I'd rather drive up there next WE!! As Qpipney has a day off today, there shared weekend is even longer this time!)
Gnatch - Fly of the Lordshipneys
OK so what's this QQEA thing (I need to brush up my reading of the main thread I guess) I'll have a look and let you know what I think.
Second (actually first) when I got up this morn and looked at my bots, this being friday, the results are mixed after a week. My instinct is to analyze the results in heavy metal detail. Some pairs have NOT behaved, others have above my expectations, etc etc etc. I have already made some decisions as to next week's line-up. Anyway, I'll summarize the results/upcoming changes shortly.
And good morning to all and may you all have a good frühstück!
" made an alert to that also, which is a good thing for the manual traders.I have already waived my potential trip to Sylt and will certainly stay around.Gnat
You really need to look into the QQE-A(djustable) as this may be the first and major key to our exit problems. Find the first post here: #1741
That word (adjustable) for me is a total synonym of TESTABLE (shaking head furiously oh no not again LOL). And you say Herbalist made an ea right. Yup, testing week-end ahead. All aboard.................
