New word of the day: Frühstück!!
FrouStuck? and what's it mean?
Did you notice qpip getting a bit testy at my inability to convey why VT HA is better
- #582
- Oct 9, 2007 8:50am Oct 9, 2007 8:50am
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
How do you say that with english pronounciation?
FrouStuck? and what's it mean?
Did you notice qpip getting a bit testy at my inability to convey why VT HA is better
LOL ... HA my actually be... grin!
Guess for Frühstück some Lynyrd Skynyrd comes in handy my hardrocking amigo: Fryhstykk or the like. hehehe
EDIT: It means "Breakfast"!! Natalie!!
- #584
- Oct 9, 2007 8:54am Oct 9, 2007 8:54am
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Is it a yummy breakfast?
You edited! Google told me anyway HA
- #585
- Edited 11:31am Oct 9, 2007 10:38am | Edited 11:31am
Did you notice qpip getting a bit testy at my inability to convey why VT HA is better
My breakfast bots are doing great. Since yesterday, they took the 40 pip/day SEVEN TIMES hehhe, so technically my week could be over.
With a few other trades, they total $203.12 (all mini (0.1) lots) profit and I'm currently in 3 trades with a balance of -11.12. Grand total: $192.
The other account which is set exactly the same, but doesn't have any TPs is at -$32.46 realized p/l and current trades (6 of them) currently with a balance of $122.88, so that's a grand total of: $90.42.
So the bots with the TPs are performing better so far, although 1.5 days is not nearly enough to start coming to conclusions! But I must say it gives me a warm feeling to have those pips stashed away.
The autobots and humanbots are feverishly ticking away. Unfortunately, their balances are respectively -76 and - 36.
Oh, and gnmat, thanks for the crab Frühstück!!
- #586
- Oct 9, 2007 11:02am Oct 9, 2007 11:02am
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Of course I'm testy, I' a tester remember hehehhhe
My breakfast bots are doing great. Since yesterday, they took the 40 pip/day SEVEN TIMES hehhe, so technically my week could be over.
With a few other trades, they total $203.12 profit and I'm currently in 3 trades with a balance of -11.12. Grand total: $192.
The other account which is set exactly the same, but doesn't have any TPs is at -$32.46 realized p/l and current trades (6 of them) currently with a balance of $122.88, so that's a grand total of: $90.42.
So the bots with the TPs are performing better so far, although 1.5 days is not nearly enough to start coming to conclusions! But I must say it gives me a warm feeling to have those pips stashed away.
The autobots and humanbots are feverishly ticking away. Unfortunately, their balances are respectively -76 and - 36.
Oh, and gnmat, thanks for the crab Frühstück!!
Good morning to you and be happy that it was crab not crapp! Wow, this was a busy morning and afternoon so far. The Forum was buzzing with activity, if I may say so. Buzzzzzzzzz!
Hope you are doing fine today. Would you mind to look into the parabolic tradingstop later today? You are at work now, right?
I am totally tired. After two nights of minimal sleep due to my morningduties I am shattered. Second half of the week is always better.
So far so scape!
GnMatt
Nice, Qpip your running bread and butter bots 1 $ a pip (0.1) right?
. Seems that with 100:1 there isn't a great deal of margin needed even when I'm in all trades (6). And if I'm not mistaken, I think MIG offer 200:1. I really need to calculate the lowest required capital to keep things safe, but I've got a hunch it's less than what I originally thought.
Yup (for now). But I keep adding a zero in my head
- #591
- Oct 9, 2007 11:52am Oct 9, 2007 11:52am
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #592
- Oct 9, 2007 11:56am Oct 9, 2007 11:56am
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #594
- Oct 9, 2007 12:00pm Oct 9, 2007 12:00pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Now, you're both bankers of some sort or another, and all I have are bank accounts 
:, soooooo feel free to correct my math/%. This is a breakdown of gnMatt's current status:
Deposit: 400.00
Balance: 1,155.62
Profit: 755.62
Per 2 mths: 188.91%
Per year: 1,133.43%
Amount of pips to get to this profit:
Yen pairs
standard: 87
mini: 869
micro: 8685
Other pairs
standard: 76
mini: 756
micro: 7556
So gmat, you mean to tell us you made about 7500 pips in the last 2 months?
:, soooooo feel free to correct my math/%. This is a breakdown of gnMatt's current status:Deposit: 400.00
Balance: 1,155.62
Profit: 755.62
Per 2 mths: 188.91%
Per year: 1,133.43%
Amount of pips to get to this profit:
Yen pairs
standard: 87
mini: 869
micro: 8685
Other pairs
standard: 76
mini: 756
micro: 7556
So gmat, you mean to tell us you made about 7500 pips in the last 2 months?
- #597
- Oct 9, 2007 1:27pm Oct 9, 2007 1:27pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Now, you're both bankers of some sort or another, and all I have are bank accounts
Deposit: 400.00
Balance: 1,155.62
Profit: 755.62
Per 2 mths: 188.91%
Per year: 1,133.43%
Amount of pips to get to this profit:
Yen pairs
standard: 87
mini: 869
micro: 8685
Other pairs
standard: 76
mini: 756
micro: 7556
So gmat, you mean to tell us you made about 7500 pips in the last 2 months?
that so people would not try to do likewise.So the number of pips, due to also not constantly going with 0.10 in the first weeks, is very much lower than calculated above and it subject to a really streched account at times. There were various single trades though, that yielded 200 pips alone on GBPJPY i.e..
No wizardry involved there from my side, it is just a forward testing playground spread over 4 platforms. I guess I was getting close to the 1H results per EA (running them over all kinds of longer TF but mainly on 4H)there and still there was an initial mixup with different EAs and settings.
No structure there and really not so special. #1515 I may have said there, that I am using them all, but I just wanted the Supernova EA mentioned seperately, as we have conclusive insight only into this momentarily. So I left it open ... same here #1512.
Sorry for the mixup!
Gnat - kiddy bedtime - be back in a sec.
rIGHTO, Still quite cool considering could have gone the other way!
Aehmm, what you forget is that by now it is 7 pairs (before 8-10), now only 2, but before 4 EAs (supernova org, uconnv1.1, glenn 1.1a, 1.1b & 1.2 taking the glenns only in pairs) have been running and it ain't that easy still, as in the beginning there were manual trades sprayed in at 0.10 to 0.40 mLots. So let's say this account was traded "heavily" with all sorts of Supernova system spinnoffs. I know that this is no sort of moneymanagement at all - sometimes the marginlevel was at only 200%, but I cannot write that on the forum, can I? Actually I had typed in, that I was sometimes in with accumulated 1.5 lots and higher, but I "edited"
So the number of pips, due to also not constantly going with 0.10 in the first weeks, is very much lower than calculated above and it subject to a really streched account at times. There were various single trades though, that yielded 200 pips alone on GBPJPY i.e..
No wizardry involved there from my side, it is just a forward testing playground spread over 4 platforms. I guess I was getting close to the 1H results per EA (running them over all kinds of longer TF but mainly on 4H)there and still there was an initial mixup with different EAs and settings.
No structure there and really not so special. #1515 I may have said there, that I am using them all, but I just wanted the Supernova EA mentioned seperately, as we have conclusive insight only into this momentarily. So I left it open ... same here #1512.
Sorry for the mixup!
Gnat - kiddy bedtime - be back in a sec.
- #599
- Oct 9, 2007 3:43pm Oct 9, 2007 3:43pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
rIGHTO, Still quite cool considering could have gone the other way!
And if it had gone wrong, at least I would have felt the pain and would have looked really closely for the bug. With a demo account I might have just opened another one. And the account could have been filled again within 4-6 hours. So no problem with this.
