Good idea, I feel as you do about TP and unless a Trailing Stop is large I don't really like them either. I prefer to scale in and out of trades but hey that's for version 5.9 probably 
DislikedOh and I wrote this up in word this morning and forgot to post it....
My new experiment for the week is this.
You may remember (or not) that I mentioned not being confortable with TPs. That’s because the greed in me says if I use a TP then I’m not going for the full potential of a given trade, so why use TPs at all.
Second, I started testing these, but they’re somewhat untestable. What I found (and it makes sense) is that the optimal TP for a given pair seems to correspond to the biggest up move or down move which occurred during the 8 months which I tested (and roughly corresponds to mid august). For instance, if we take eurjpy, we’d need to set a TP of 760 (it’s not a typo) in order to go grab the extra 36 pips which the trade of aug 15-17 had the potential for. How do I know what next month’s “biggest move” will be. I simply don’t.
So that’s why I quit testing the TPs.
Now, on the other hand, as far as my FastFoodBots (shorter TFs) are concerned, I’m still being bugged by the idea of having some “secured” pips under my pillow. So I got another idea. This week, my experiment is this. I have 2 sets of FlyEatingBots exactly mirrorring each other, except that one has TPs of 40 for each pair which will constitute my safety pips (safety dance? heh)
So at the end of the week we’ll see which one is further ahead (they’re currently identical since I just got that idea 2.7 minutes ago).
What I’d like to do (which is not doable, I don’t think at least) would be to EXIT ALL POSITIONS AT ONCE! when the combined + and – pips of any pairs/trades equal 40. But for now, I’ll settle with 40 each and see how it goes.Ignored