Dinnertime... be back in a sec with more language courses... LOL
:
- #525
- Oct 8, 2007 12:32pm Oct 8, 2007 12:32pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #526
- Oct 8, 2007 12:44pm Oct 8, 2007 12:44pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #527
- Oct 8, 2007 12:49pm Oct 8, 2007 12:49pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Hey, baby Brandt is in da house! 
They only new each other from a forum or something ...
I am now posting an ad :
I like eating insects
please send photo + CV to this email addy: [b][email protected][/b]. Will roast wings and we can drink wine together while munching on DA CHIPS (no eating of Mr. Pipperman on the 1st date) No but seriously, now.
Tests completed for chfjpy
Best TF = 4H with no filters gives (the best result) –0.8 pips/mth
With SL of 30 we get an additional 43 pips, so 42 pips/mth
No trailing stop can improve on this.
So, hmmm, 42 pips (these are PIPs not $$ I got confused earlier) per month is not really impressive. Since it’s less than half of the least performing of the pairs I’ve included in my “portfolio”, I won’t be including it.
But gmat, keep me posted about those 6 mini-lots, see how it turns out in the end.
- #532
- Oct 8, 2007 1:09pm Oct 8, 2007 1:09pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #533
- Oct 8, 2007 1:11pm Oct 8, 2007 1:11pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL on that one
I am now posting an ad :
I like eating insects
- #534
- Oct 8, 2007 1:18pm Oct 8, 2007 1:18pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
So overall it equates to 42 pips so I am assuming there is some big drawdown somewhere along the line? Because when I look manually at these pairs they seem to give a heck of a lot more
Are we getting mixed up here.
1. I thought that Pippy just tested USDCHF, as I am long that pair, as described earlier. I wanted to get rid of the template for all the pairs that were tested negative, and then I saw this beautiful setup for a long position on that.
2. On CHFJPY we should surely have more pips, but we have it on our list & tableau, right?
3. Even on USDCHF we may actually be much better manually, and on the other hand, we need to look into the drawdown matter of the EA. Still long there after entering 1.1650 - 89 on 6 mlots and it is now at 1.1869. No end in sight for that. So there is definitely more pips in that, as I am not holding this position for 2 months, but for a week!
Bsssss... no shoot me ... me just a Fliege!! (hint: next word!)
So overall it equates to 42 pips so I am assuming there is some big drawdown somewhere along the line? Because when I look manually at these pairs they seem to give a heck of a lot more
But I really did the tests like I usually do. Tell me which TF/set-up you're contemplating and I'll give it a shot.
Well you can try and do the tests on your side and see if you come up with the same results (hehehhe just joking since I know you love testing).
But I really did the tests like I usually do. Tell me which TF/set-up you're contemplating and I'll give it a shot.
mostly because it disagrees with me
- #538
- Oct 8, 2007 1:30pm Oct 8, 2007 1:30pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
hehe no these pairs may be for manual trading then and yes I hate backtester
mostly because it disagrees with me