Auslanco - GBP/JPY and GBP/USD (newstrade)

Quoting fanforex

Disliked

I still doing it at demo, i just strictly follow the strategy rule.
no matter they were seperated by 22, 3 or 4 bars.
therefore, we will know how the strategy react to the situation like this.
whether the result comes up win or loss

Ignored

Quoting karmostaji

Disliked

The dot and the arrow

Ignored

Quoting brok

Disliked

Mate we are demoing the strategy and QQE60 is slow because of its value. If you can backtest and say this as a trade condition it will be very helpful. Otherwise don't get to people who are demoing the exact rules...

Ignored

Quoting karmostaji

Disliked

I didn't take it because price was going to test 50EMA, 50% fib and a 4H trendline, all those 3 things were close to each other and I also said that price will bounce off it and it did, that is why I didn't take it.. plus the 2 signals on aus strategy were very far apart.

Ignored

Quoting maheswara

Disliked

allrite bro , i ve been doing some back test too , i can not put in general principal yet but seemingly the tp and entry time is very much dependable on the seperation of the two signal
example ( please note im still testing it n creating my own filter )
when signals happen in the same bar tp of 2 x sl is a minimum condition and entry time doesn't always need to wait for conformation bar , sometimes u can miss the trade if u wait for confirmation bar
as we move further bars between the signals , tp of 2 x sl is ideal and confirmation bar is good enough entry , but when signals are apart more than 10 bars , generally tp = sl ...
so mathematically speaking tp is inversely proportional to signals distance
sorry if i confused a lot of testers here , but it will be nice if some1 can take notice of this and do valid the little principle i ve summarized

Ignored

Quoting maheswara

Disliked

allrite bro , i ve been doing some back test too , i can not put in general principal yet but seemingly the tp and entry time is very much dependable on the seperation of the two signal
example ( please note im still testing it n creating my own filter )
when signals happen in the same bar tp of 2 x sl is a minimum condition and entry time doesn't always need to wait for conformation bar , sometimes u can miss the trade if u wait for confirmation bar
as we move further bars between the signals , tp of 2 x sl is ideal and confirmation bar is good enough entry , but when signals are apart more than 10 bars , generally tp = sl ...
so mathematically speaking tp is inversely proportional to signals distance
sorry if i confused a lot of testers here , but it will be nice if some1 can take notice of this and do valid the little principle i ve summarized

Ignored

Quoting karmostaji

Disliked

sit tight bears

Ignored

Quoting maheswara

Disliked

allrite bro , i ve been doing some back test too , i can not put in general principal yet but seemingly the tp and entry time is very much dependable on the seperation of the two signal
example ( please note im still testing it n creating my own filter )
when signals happen in the same bar tp of 2 x sl is a minimum condition and entry time doesn't always need to wait for conformation bar , sometimes u can miss the trade if u wait for confirmation bar
as we move further bars between the signals , tp of 2 x sl is ideal and confirmation bar is good enough entry , but when signals are apart more than 10 bars , generally tp = sl ...
so mathematically speaking tp is inversely proportional to signals distance
sorry if i confused a lot of testers here , but it will be nice if some1 can take notice of this and do valid the little principle i ve summarized

Ignored

Quoting zoheir

Disliked

Yes pleeaaaaaaaase

Ignored

Quoting karmostaji

Disliked

Patience gives me pips

Ignored

Quoting zoheir

Disliked

gives US pips

Ignored

Quoting lepiricus

Disliked

You guys figure this bear is hungry enough to retest 231.87?

Ignored