EA-Rejection Total- Testing proved really good EA | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

In your experience, which Fibonacci numbers have proved better? 18 replies

total value for end of bar total 0 replies

The Really Really Boring Forex System 97 replies

Strategy Testing - Testing 2EAs simultaneously 5 replies

I never proved anything 42 replies

Attachments: EA-Rejection Total- Testing proved really good EA
Exit Attachments

EA-Rejection Total- Testing proved really good EA

  • #1
  • First Post: Edited Feb 3, 2026 3:28am Jan 30, 2026 4:23am | Edited Feb 3, 2026 3:28am
Hi I have been using this ea all week and modifying it as I watched it's responses I am happy with it so far, please try it and let me know what you all think, Should you want to change any of the figures keep the math's the same, I think its running at it's best using it as it is set now, great for small accounts.

Good Luck
Geoff Hornibrook
Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 Rejection Total.ex4   59 KB | 163 downloads
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2.PNG Size: 18 KB
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1.PNG Size: 53 KB


Try Rejection Super, this ea has different entry conditions it trades more makes more profit with slightly more risk, I like it though enough to run live,

Geoff
Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 Rejection Super.ex4   60 KB | 133 downloads | Uploaded Jan 31, 2026 10:39am

Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 Rejection Super V3.ex4   59 KB | 141 downloads | Uploaded Feb 3, 2026 3:25am


Rejection Super V3 is updated to draw less with the more profit thanks to Go5

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: chart1.PNG Size: 37 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: chart2.PNG Size: 40 KB
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: < 1 KB
  • #2
  • Feb 2, 2026 5:10am Feb 2, 2026 5:10am
Nice, thanks for sharing! Running EA's I would always use broker sided SL/TP (mains problem, hardware failures...). Another thing that has proved to be quite handy, is adapting the logic to "open prices only" testing: no more hassle with tickdata quality/quantity. From what I am seeing here I think this can be done. A time filter would also be good.
  • #3
  • Feb 2, 2026 6:26am Feb 2, 2026 6:26am
Quoting Go5
Nice, thanks for sharing! Running EA's I would always use broker sided SL/TP (mains problem, hardware failures...). Another thing that has proved to be quite handy, is adapting the logic to "open prices only" testing: no more hassle with tickdata quality/quantity. From what I am seeing here I think this can be done. A time filter would also be good.
thanks for your input I don’t quite understand some things you say but others I do. As for time being added I don’t know how to do that I keep trying but not yet cracked it. If I found an ea that had time in it I would be able to figure it out from the source code but I’m not the best coder just a hobby
cheers
geoff
  • #4
  • Feb 2, 2026 12:42pm Feb 2, 2026 12:42pm
With the help of the gods in the cloud, I could give it a try.
The goal is to avoid any actions taken at intra-bar data. The logic would be something like: High(1) > High(2), FastSMA(1)<SlowSMA(1): sell with fixed SL+TP ( at the open of bar(0) and place limit sell order (if 2 trades are allowed) at 2nd entrance distance (D) with SL' =(SL-D) and TP' = (TP-D). Then, if at any new open the combined floating profit >TP: close both trades.If trade 1 is closed (TP): delete limit order.
Not yet shure of your exact entrance criteria..

Example of EA with Day- + Hours filter:
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 SATL-HA_EA.mq4   15 KB | 138 downloads
  • #5
  • Feb 2, 2026 1:30pm Feb 2, 2026 1:30pm
Quoting Go5
With the help of the gods in the cloud, I could give it a try. The goal is to avoid any actions taken at intra-bar data. The logic would be something like: High(1) > High(2), FastSMA(1)<SlowSMA(1): sell with fixed SL+TP ( at the open of bar(0) and place limit sell order (if 2 trades are allowed) at 2nd entrance distance (D) with SL' =(SL-D) and TP' = (TP-D). Then, if at any new open the combined floating profit >TP: close both trades.If trade 1 is closed (TP): delete limit order. Not yet shure of your exact entrance criteria.. Example of EA with...

Hi, If this is your work you are way ahead of me, its great coding completely different from the way I code but I love it, this ea will help me a lot in working out time input, although I have been working most of the day on it and I am close now. My wife came out with a good one today she said why add times to your ea when you have to have the computer on anyway! just turn it on and off when you want to trade.. I've tried your ea it seams to enter a buy when it should be selling, either way it's great stuff, Thanks for your input. I will study it for a while and try and get it to sink in when I'm not so tired.

Geoff
  • #6
  • Feb 2, 2026 1:53pm Feb 2, 2026 1:53pm
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} Hi, If this is your work you are way ahead of me, its great coding completely different from the way I code but I love it, this ea will help me a lot in working out time input, although I have been working most of the day on it and I am close now. My wife came out with a good one today she said why add times to your ea when you have to have the computer on anyway! just turn it on and off when you want to trade.. I've tried your ea it seams to enter a buy when it should be selling, either way it's great stuff, Thanks for...
The logic is mine, coding via AI. A trade is taken according to HA-candle, SATL, ADX and ATR (Just an example of a time filter). However, I like your wife's alternative.
If you can explain the logic of your ea I could give it a try making it more complete and ok for open prices testing.
  • #7
  • Feb 2, 2026 2:05pm Feb 2, 2026 2:05pm
Quoting Go5
{quote} The logic is mine, coding via AI. A trade is taken according to HA-candle, SATL, ADX and ATR (Just an example of a time filter). However, I like your wife's alternative. If you can explain the logic of your ea I could give it a try making it more complete and ok for open prices testing.
Logic? is this what you mean ( are you a Robot )

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: logic.PNG Size: 14 KB
  • #8
  • Feb 3, 2026 4:43am Feb 3, 2026 4:43am
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} Logic? is this what you mean ( are you a Robot ) {image}
According to my wife - yes, a slow forgetting robotic Zombie - haha. But yes I sort of meant the basic rules / criteria you use. I would have to change the "Ask<Open(1) part because it uses intra-bar data which we don't have when testing with open prices. If you test my EA from above with Ticks, Control Data or Open Prices Only you should get the exact same result, as well when comparing with live testing.
Are you testing your EA on a live account? If not beware of the very small TP you have in your setting.
  • #9
  • Feb 3, 2026 4:58am Feb 3, 2026 4:58am
Quoting Go5
{quote} According to my wife - yes, a slow forgetting robotic Zombie - haha. But yes I sort of meant the basic rules / criteria you use. I would have to change the "Ask<Open(1) part because it uses intra-bar data which we don't have when testing with open prices. If you test my EA from above with Ticks, Control Data or Open Prices Only you should get the exact same result, as well when comparing with live testing. Are you testing your EA on a live account? If not beware of the very small TP you have in your setting.
I use the open command because it will not trade when I use high or low like I really wanted to use. Check your messages

geoff
  • #10
  • Feb 3, 2026 2:31pm Feb 3, 2026 2:31pm
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} I use the open command because it will not trade when I use high or low like I really wanted to use. Check your messages geoff
Here's a version using high/low, let me know.
Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 Reject-test.ex4   17 KB | 95 downloads
  • #11
  • Edited 3:12pm Feb 3, 2026 3:00pm | Edited 3:12pm
Quoting Go5
{quote} Here's a version using high/low, let me know. {file}


You have got it coming in at exactly where I want it to come in, how have you done that, I've tried going from exp 5-8 to simple but as I have to use
H1 > H2 Ask < open 1 instead of what I really want H1 > H2 Ask < Low 1 as it does not trade at all, I can't figure it out. that's great now all I have to do is figure out how you got the entry in the right place lol Well done

Geoff
I have just tried it on 5-8 ex potential instead of simple and it nearly doubles the profit
  • #12
  • Feb 3, 2026 3:31pm Feb 3, 2026 3:31pm
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} You have got it coming in at exactly where I want it to come in, how have you done that, I've tried going from exp 5-8 to simple but as I have to use H1 > H2 Ask < open 1 instead of what I really want H1 > H2 Ask < Low 1 as it does not trade at all, I can't figure it out. that's great now all I have to do is figure out how you got the entry in the right place lol Well done Geoff I have just tried it on 5-8 ex potential instead of simple and it nearly doubles the profit
// Define MAs
double MAslow = iMA(Symbol(), 0, MAperiodSlow, 0, MAmethodSlow, AppliedPriceSlow, 1);
double MAfast = iMA(Symbol(), 0, MAperiodFast, 0, MAmethodFast, AppliedPriceFast, 1);
// --- SELL SIGNAL ---
if(MAfast < MAslow && High[1] > High[2] && Ask < Low[1] && my_Orderdata.AllowSell)
{
// ONE TRADE PER BAR CHECK
if(LastTradeBar != Time[0])
{
my_Orderdata.PlaceSell = true;
}
}

More profit is nice but I look mainly at the recovery factor.
  • #13
  • Feb 4, 2026 12:16am Feb 4, 2026 12:16am
Quoting Go5
{quote} // Define MAs double MAslow = iMA(Symbol(), 0, MAperiodSlow, 0, MAmethodSlow, AppliedPriceSlow, 1); double MAfast = iMA(Symbol(), 0, MAperiodFast, 0, MAmethodFast, AppliedPriceFast, 1); // --- SELL SIGNAL --- if(MAfast < MAslow && High[1] > High[2] && Ask < Low[1] && my_Orderdata.AllowSell) { // ONE TRADE PER BAR CHECK if(LastTradeBar != Time[0]) { my_Orderdata.PlaceSell = true; } } More profit is nice but I look mainly at the recovery factor.

Michael, this is exactly what I tried but it just will not do as it should, that's the bit I can't understand

Geoff

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: entry.PNG Size: 16 KB
  • #14
  • Feb 4, 2026 7:11am Feb 4, 2026 7:11am
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} Michael, this is exactly what I tried but it just will not do as it should, that's the bit I can't understand Geoff {image}
Can you post the mq4 file?
  • #15
  • Feb 10, 2026 7:02pm Feb 10, 2026 7:02pm
any change to get source code of rejection super v3? would like to improve it
  • #16
  • Feb 11, 2026 1:38am Feb 11, 2026 1:38am
Quoting Nikuz
any change to get source code of rejection super v3? would like to improve it
its already done thanks Go5 is a genius he helped totally rebuild the ea. it’s just not shared it’s being tested.

Geoff
  • #17
  • Feb 11, 2026 1:43am Feb 11, 2026 1:43am
Quoting Nikuz
any change to get source code of rejection super v3? would like to improve it
Try Trade Hunter it’s doing unreal made £116.00 yesterday. It’s in one of my posts.

Geoff hornibrook
  • #18
  • Feb 11, 2026 3:27am Feb 11, 2026 3:27am
hello

Please send me the set file

thank you bro
  • #19
  • Feb 11, 2026 3:51am Feb 11, 2026 3:51am
Quoting jaewonyang
hello Please send me the set file thank you bro
hi it’s already on available to download just check down the list

Geoff
listed as great ea 5-8-21 with trailing stop
  • #20
  • Feb 11, 2026 5:34pm Feb 11, 2026 5:34pm
Quoting Gadge007
{quote} hi it’s already on available to download just check down the list Geoff listed as great ea 5-8-21 with trailing stop
Please upload the source code file.
Thank you, bro.
0 traders viewing now