No Past Predictive Zones – Looks Like Magic

Hi everyone,

Welcome to my "No Past Predictive Zones – Looks Like Magic" or "Dynamic supply & Demand levels" thread.
I'm @IaMasterTrader.
Born in 1983, software engineer, trading the markets since 2006.
From the start, one question stayed with me: Why does price reverse at certain levels? Why not go further? I searched for a clear, practical answer. After years of study, testing many systems, and trial & error, the key became clear: identifying true supply and demand zones – forward-looking and predictive, not just based on past highs/lows. Dynamic zones that project ahead across timeframes.
The challenge was manual drawing: time-consuming, error-prone, and leading to inconsistent results despite solid logic.
I tried coding it before, but complexity and life got in the way. With recent AI advances in coding, I revived and completed the project.
After nearly 20 years of trading and about a year of focused development and testing, I built a dynamic, predictive Supply & Demand zones indicator for TradingView.

Main features:
Works in all markets (Forex, stocks, crypto, commodities...)
Automatically plots real supply/demand zones in any timeframe
Based purely on supply/demand logic – no past highs/lows used (Non-Historical)
Zones projected forward and adapt as the market evolves
Price often reacts strongly to these zones, creating the illusion of perfect hindsight – though they are truly forward-projected.
This journal is to share the system gradually: the logic, real chart examples, live reactions, and step-by-step usage tips. With proper analysis and patience, it can help reduce repeated losses and support consistent growth.
The indicator is currently for my personal use on TradingView only. Any update on sharing or release will be posted here first.
Looking forward to your questions and feedback. Let's explore these No Past Predictive Zones together.

********************************************

https://www.tradingview.com/x/29JjRZE6

Here’s a current snapshot of XAUUSD (Gold) showing projected dynamic supply & demand zones across multiple timeframes (M15 to H1).
All zones are forward-projected based on current structure – no past highs/lows used. They adapt as the market evolves.
Labels indicate the timeframe for each zone (e.g., "H1 Demand", "M30 Supply").
I'll follow up in a few days with an updated chart to show the actual price reactions.
Looking forward to your thoughts – does this align with what you've seen on Gold lately?

At any given level there may or may not be demand or supply.
Why silver and gold dropped like a stone and no demand level held ?

Please make your magic and tell me on what level I should buy gold today and on what level I should sell.

If I want to show you the supply and demand zones in the downward move starting from January 29th, please take a look at the chart below. This is the XAUUSD (Gold) chart on the m1 timeframe, covering January 29th and 30th:

https://www.tradingview.com/x/Kx38c2G6/

Before looking at this chart, let me explain a few key points:
The points marked with the letter A indicate the exact time and place where supply zones were identified and placed. If you look closely, you’ll see that after these zones were drawn, price at least once returned to retest them before continuing the downtrend.
The points marked with B are demand zones that were either filled by strong supply (shown by the cut-through lines) or successfully absorbed the demand and caused a rebound in price.
However, since the chart I shared in the first post was from higher timeframes (M15 to H1) and only included zones from those levels, you wouldn’t have seen these finer zones here.
Regarding the price holding in the original chart from the first post, I’d like to draw your attention to the lower part of that chart, where it says “M30 and H1 demand zones overlapped.” Notice how price reacted to these overlapping zones and rebounded strongly. Even more interesting: before reaching these demand zones (the blue lines at the bottom), there were no demand zones present in the M15 timeframe or higher!

For today, I’ve marked the supply and demand zones for the M5 (thinner lines) and M15 (thicker lines) timeframes on the chart. I’ve also noted the exact time when these lines were projected forward. As the market progresses, the price reactions to these zones will reveal themselves – often in ways that feel remarkably precise.

https://www.tradingview.com/x/y7qGaLRy/

Now, what do you think? Do these zones seem particularly effective to you?

Too early to say, waiting for step-by-step magic reveal.

Sure, I'll update the m1 chart from today by the end of the day or tomorrow.
But right now, what are your thoughts on the m1 chart from January 29th? Specifically, regarding the supply and demand zones identified and plotted by the indicator, and how price reacted to them?
https://www.tradingview.com/x/Kx38c2G6/

In uptrend supply levels get violated, in downtrend demand levels get violated.
In range supply and demand levels get accepted for a while till they get violated again.

Levels starting in the middle of nowhere (only your indicator sees it) makes zero sense for me. Magic is dead for me.
But I am waiting for step up step reveal and hope magic is real.

Thank you – you’re raising some really interesting points, and explaining them helps highlight even more clearly how powerful and capable this indicator is at identifying, plotting, and – when necessary – invalidating (cutting the extension of) these zones once they are no longer useful.
We can all agree that no supply or demand zone is meant to remain valid and effective forever.
In the charts I shared with you, the zones whose extensions get broken very quickly after formation are supply and demand levels that were created against the current dominant trend – purely to bring price to the major levels and then reverse back to the main trend. They get invalidated as part of that process.
This actually demonstrates one of the indicator’s strengths: it recognizes and plots not only the primary trend zones, but also the corrective / counter-trend zones – so the trader can see the full structure and understand exactly when and why a level is likely to fail.
What are your thoughts on this behavior? Have you noticed similar patterns in your own charts or with other supply/demand tools?

I don't use magic. Just simple support and resistance levels and space between them gets usually filed.
Why not to make you indicator public if you like to get feedback, or you plan to sell it on tradingview marketplace ?

Todays London session

Alright, as the final update for today and to demonstrate a real backtest example of the indicator’s ability to identify future supply and demand zones without any historical precedent, I’m sharing the EUR/USD chart covering the last three trading days of January.

https://www.tradingview.com/x/xfcDe67X/

Quick explanation:
These supply zones are plotted exactly at the moment the market reaches the positions marked by the orange arrows – right in front of the most recent closed candle.
Notice how precisely all these zones were retested by price pullbacks after being identified and drawn, before the downtrend continued.
And just to remind: once identified and plotted, these zones never change their original time or price level – except when their extension is invalidated (cut), and that only happens when the supply or demand at that level has been fully absorbed.
I’ll likely make a decision in the near future about offering limited, non-public access/subscription to this indicator on the TradingView platform, and I’ll announce any updates here first.
What do you think? Have you seen this level of precision in forward-projected zones on your own charts or with other tools?

Magic and miracles happen when you're truly prepared for them – when you can visualize and even feel them before they unfold.

For today's forward test, I'm excited to share a fresh snapshot of the EUR/USD chart on the M5 timeframe!

https://www.tradingview.com/x/PcMxgLts/

As of right now (around 8 minutes past midnight Friday New York time), price is sitting just below a key M5 supply zone. The recent attempt to break higher and kick off an upward move didn't succeed, so there's a real chance we see a downward push starting right from here. That said, this particular level doesn't feel super reliable for sells just yet – it's not the strongest setup.
For more solid bearish scenarios based on the zones the indicator has already identified and projected, these two look far more promising:
1- Price rallies up to the higher M5 supply zone that was plotted two days ago. We saw an absolutely flawless, textbook reaction there yesterday – a perfect rejection. If price touches it again, it could fuel the continuation of the downtrend that started last week. That kind of clean reaction is exactly what gets me fired up!
2- The really strong H1 supply zone identified and drawn early yesterday. Price seems to have a strong urge to absorb the available supply at this level before resuming the bigger down move. I've highlighted it with the orange line and label on the M5 chart for clarity.
Of course, since today is the last trading day of the week, we might have to wait until early next week to see which of these scenarios plays out fully.
Let's stay tuned together and watch what happens next – this is the exciting part!

Alright, since the indicator continuously identifies new supply and demand zones as time progresses, removes or adjusts filled zones, and only cuts or corrects extensions when truly necessary, I waited for the market to do its thing so I could eventually show you the complete picture of all the zones. This way you can compare them directly with your own charts.
Looking at the XAUUSD chart from February 5th that I shared with you, you can see that my “magical” indicator spotted four very strong supply zones for sell positions right from the start of the day. As time passed, price returned to each of them in sequence – with only zone #3 and its area not being fully touched.

https://www.tradingview.com/x/AqlfDbco/

On the other hand, given the dominant downtrend in the days leading up to February 5th, the only suitable demand zone/area for buy trades was that M5 demand level touched in the early hours of February 6th. Because of the relatively strong demand at that level, price continued its upward move right through the end of Friday’s session.
If this kind of harmony and perfect coordination isn’t magic, then what is?
Now it’s your turn… tell me what you think