My CCI master method 4 hour charts

Roger,
No the real reason James posts on FF is because he is paid by this site to post systems which in turn generates clicks and posts and therefore advertising revenue for the site.
Its so obvious.

Thanks fella, I must be getting old. It might be obvious to you my friend, but given his facebook presence etc, I thought I had researched it, my responses weren't based on this forum alone.

I am intrigued though. How do you know this ? Why are you so confident you are correct?

They are not sarcastic questions, I truly appreciate the challenge mate, I need to learn.

Furthermore, can you explain James' previous internet presence where he tries to create telegram groups ? Can you explain the withdrawn YouTube videos.... the list goes on, he is a failing marketeer well outside of this Forum. But I stand to be corrected, because it is 'obvious'.

I have no knowledge of his other tricks in his bag but you don't need to. Its all about internet traffic my friend....the more you have the more the money rolls in. No need to overanalyse it...its simply about generating clicks, views, likes...etc Do it well and you make a good enough income that trading is not required....

No sorry fella, it's still not 'obvious'. I probably know more about SEO and Digital Marketing than you think. I honestly don't understand your perspective ? So you are telling me that website admins that can create as many login's and threads from as many IP addresses as they like, pay one man that has been around for more than 10 years in multiple locations to create one thread per week in amongst a forum that has around 1.4m users and on average 10,000 users active at any given time ? Trust me, that one man makes no difference to click generation. Or are you going to tell me that 50% of the content on this website is click-bait and it's not just one man ? Are you aware that if you do pay people to generate false content, then your money is much better spent on content external to your website, reviews links etc, this is actually has a bigger impact on SEO and click generation.

You've made quite the authoritative statement, being that is so obvious, so I am keen to learn what I am missing.

That’s among the reasons why you’ve jumped to such a mistaken conclusion about his presence and activity here. Context matters.

lol

I doubt it.I was in a Skype trading room years ago and he was the same. He had a new system every night. He just doesn't get it

ok guys

i am now trading the 5 minute chart in line with the 4 hour bias

try it

Great System! You may not have had some winners in the past, but this one's definitely a winner! Thank you, It's very much appreciated and quite brilliant!
People just need the discipline to follow through with the signals. I'll see if I could get a EA coded on Fiverr.

Some guys makes me feel guilty for following his strategy. IMO, I don't care if he want to share, I just test it. Not work? then just ignore those. I just want to see something fresh. Thanks James.
This is my backtest (manual) result on EURUSD M15 for about 50+ trades. Maybe not enough samples size but it gives me some interesting idea.

I use fixed SL about 15pips TP 30 ( 2RR) , if CCI cross opposite then I manual close
At first, it just seems like an ordinary crossover strategy we seen a tons before. Until I found out.
It's strengths actually is ability to "Reduce loss in Sideways"

You guys all know this kind of strategy will 100% dead in sideways right? But this method will almost everytime bail you out when potential SW is upcoming by crossing opposite manual close.

You can see those sideways in my equity curve that is going flat. That is where this method reduce so much loss in SW

So that when the actual TRENDING is coming, you would not missing out by having too much confirmation as in other method, and still get you out of SW quick enough.

This is just my opinion, please don't insult me. I don't take sides. I'm just trader who happy to get some new ideas. Hope this not trigger anyone

Trades will look like this, some might even goes into profit 1RR, but not reaching 2, so I close it manually when it cross opposite.
And don't forget, this is just M15, so much noise but it can generate profits. Other TF? you have the idea.

Fiverr can work for MetaQuotes programmers, but the experience is inconsistent because the platform doesn’t vet technical skill. Anyone can list themselves as a developer, so quality ranges from excellent to unusable. That lack of screening is the biggest risk for MQL4/MQL5 work, where clean logic, stable execution, and platform‑specific quirks matter a lot.

The upside is cost and speed: you get access to a huge pool of freelancers, fixed‑price gigs, escrow protection, and visible reviews. The downside is that reviews mostly reflect Fiverr activity, not real‑world trading‑system expertise, and many sellers package “EA coding” as a generic service without understanding MT4/MT5 edge cases like order‑handling, back test modelling, or indicator buffer behaviour.

If you ever consider using it for MQL work, the safest approach is to treat it like hiring a contractor for a live trading system: ask for sample code, confirm they’ve built EAs or indicators similar to yours, and check how they handle revisions and bug fixes.

Examples for how reduce loss look like.
1st trade on picture 1. Sell entry occurs and it goes to 1RR, but it comes back and the CCI cross back, so I manual close with just very small loss ( some may even be in profit with this method)
2nd trade I open Buy and next candle close, the CCI cross back down, so I also manual cut a small loss.
3rd trade, I open Sell immediately after the 2nd trade close because I just trade when CCI cross. Then it works out and get 2RR

You guys see the idea? IMO, it can be any combination oscillator , but this just works.

However, when the cross happen, you need to make sure it clearly pointing up or down, not flat. And I also saw something, it can trade CCI pull back at SMA100 too (same idea with Big E's TDI) but I have to test more.

Most important thing I tweak from James's method, is I have fixed TP at 2RR. I guess with his idea that not have TP is also work.
But my method needs to secure 2RR because I use M15, trend won't last that long to produce more than 2R.

You should take at least 2RR, otherwise you will burn your account in sideways.

My idea is, loss less in SW, get big win in trend.

If anyone want EA, just use Claude Ai . Bro , it is 2026. Ai can write it for you super easy. If anyone got ideas, just use Ai.
The MT5 CCI Sma cross in my previous post . I also use Claude make it for me with Alert integrate. I may add some dashboard to see and filter clear cross angle.

More tweaking stuff from me. As I dwell into backtesting, CCI can be use as Support Resistance too. It maybe great spot if you want to take early TP when CCI hit its previous low/high. It gives you more RR than choosing to TP at normal S/R as you see in the picture.

I've tested USDJPY M15 for 100 trades and I have some advice if anyone want to try my method.

** My SMA settings not use Shift 10

Proper SL is super crucial. Otherwise my method won't work. If SL is too tight, you will get full SL before the CCI cross and can't reduce your SL as I design (or even continue to the TP direction)

With proper SL, the price got room to breath, when price goes into some profit and reverse, you won't get SL immediately (unless there is a big spike). Then CCI will cross so that you can get out with a less loss. Or in profit scenario, price reverse but CCI still not cross, so it is not time to get out early, some may continues and get TP.

2nd Pic is example where my method not work. Price just spike in only 1 bar, so the CCI can't react to it fast enough, but this is not happen frequently.

You can see in 3rd pic. My equity curve go very flat at order no.60-80, it is a huge SW for 2-3 days. And yes, I trade it all and I don't care if it is SW or not for about 20 trades. But you can see, almost every trade got super less loss and breakeven. So it can't burn my account in SW.

I do not recommend adding any other filter. Because if you trade for long enough, adding SW filter or any stuff for confirmation. You will missing a good trend. Because in reality, we don't know for 100% sure if SW is incoming or trend is incoming. Maybe you got to lose for some several trades before you realize it is SW. It maybe some kind of system that can 100% identify "Real-time" SW or trend , if you happy with that so use what you think is useful.
But I'm much prefer my method. I don't even look up on chart. IDC if anyone want to say I should see PA or SR or anything. I've tested it and what I do is only see the CCI crossing with the right angle. That's it.


My recommend is, trade every single CCI cross (with good angle , not flat) . If you waiting for too much confirmation, your SL TP will get wider. And trend will exhaust already when confirmation tell you to get in, and then reduce loss method also not work. It's a chain reaction.

Lastly, try it by yourself and you will see what I mean.

**My backtesting use fixed 100$ risk per trade, so you can see lot may not fixed. (This is what I think the best way to proof consistency)

Ps. I'm not even sure if James already abandon this thread. So, you guys can also try my method if you think James's original method not suits you.

Did anyone get an EA on this system yet? If not i'll try to make one on Claude.io

Here's the EA . I haven't tried it yet. Going to put it on a demo with 1 minute TF. We'll try!

It's important to have a different magic number for each pair. Even if they're different pairs they need an individual unique magic number or they won't open.
I'm trying now on the 5min TF.