RSI-Trading (Nasdaq)

Z（news） ordes
However, the order notes start with rT, which is slightly different

these 3 script buttons are re-situated in better places. beside +/-ve provit boxes
-

excellent . .
why they sat it is a complex system?
?

BUDDIES-QUIZ-TEST:
why second letter in OrderComment is teh letter "T"
It is clearly BTCUSD

It takes at least one day to practice placing orders logically, by constantly observing the screen to see different situations, clicking different buttons, or observing through pending orders

In recent days, I have focused on trying to achieve some results on my live account using basic functions (the entire hedge system and worse and better prices are still ahead of me to learn). Last Tuesday, I started with a capital of $500 and a target of ~10% per day. Today is Tuesday, and the capital is $1,021, so over 100% in a week, wow. I traded two times a day for 2-3 hours during periods of reduced volatility. Let's keep going.

there is another chart for symbl starting with "B".

mt4 will be delayed fro 24 hours !!
to double check auto-rf. BucksBunny note
-------------------------

excellent
to be specific,
T: second chart

when you attach expert to two chart for BTX:

desrimiantion:
orders of chart-1 expert will strat with letter rB -- B first letter in BTCUSD
orders of chart-2 epxert will start with letter rT --- T 2nd letter in BTCUSD
and so on for 3rd , ,

-

PENDING BUYSTOP/SELLSTOP,,,,,,, added

These great results and my desire to keep improving are all thanks to your experience and understanding.
his expert is just a tool that might be of some assistance

who agrees with teh writer:

Managing a state is inherently a complex matter.
It requires the constant preservation of legitimacy and the maintenance of a strong, unbroken thread of trust between the ruler and the people. Deep listening to the citizens is essential; one cannot be content with official reports whose authors have no interest in asking difficult questions or stirring doubts. The daily realities of ordinary citizens cannot be ignored—especially when poverty rates rise, when the national currency deteriorates, when inflation steals or shrinks people’s meals. And it is always imperative to keep the flame of hope alive. When the horizon closes, anger, resentment, and bitterness accumulate until the dam finally breaks.In preserving the state, there must be a ruler who truly understands both his own story and the wider world.
Many countries have paid exorbitant prices when decision-making rested in the hands of a man ignorant of international balances and blind to the power of those who shape the features of the world. Some rulers became excessively intoxicated by the sense of their own strength and that of their nations. The thread connecting them to facts, figures, and realities was severed. One day Saddam Hussein believed he could invade Kuwait without paying a price.
Muammar Gaddafi believed he could provoke America and send bombs to explode civilian airliners.
The Iranian regime believed it could destroy the U.S. Marines headquarters in Beirut, kill hundreds of American soldiers, and escape consequences—even if delayed.Some rulers came to believe that the economy was a marginal or secondary issue that could be entrusted to men distinguished by loyalty rather than competence.
Their bet was on distributing spoils to supporters and addressing the people through the brutality of the security apparatus.
They adopted the principle that “waiting is the best advisor” and that opening the door to change inevitably leads to chaos and collapse.
Any demand for reform was viewed as treachery or espionage; the remedy was death or prolonged imprisonment.Stagnation is the most lethal disease that afflicts both individuals and states.
Leonid Brezhnev was a master at guarding stagnation.
His prime minister, Alexei Kosygin, timidly attempted to propose solutions to increase production, stimulate the economy, and respect basic economic principles—but the hardline current quickly encircled and neutralized his steps, cementing the dominance of stagnation and decline. When Mikhail Gorbachev appeared in the mid-1980s attempting to save the system through perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness), the aged body exploded and the Soviet Union shattered into fragments.Many Arab regimes drew only one conclusion from Gorbachev’s experience: that it was a project of collapse. On August 19, 1991, during a dialogue session in Baghdad between a government delegation and a Kurdish delegation, news arrived of the coup attempt against Gorbachev in Moscow. The tone of the government delegation immediately changed to the point of insulting the visiting delegation, which had no choice but to leave.Bashar al-Assad viewed Gorbachev from exactly the same perspective. He promised reforms, but the generals he inherited from his father quickly convinced him that opening a window in a country ruled by a minority meant nothing other than letting in the storm.
He failed to recognize the dangers of stagnation and the cumulative weight of economic failure.
And then what happened, happened.China was fortunate.
In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping emerged onto the stage of decision-making.
He understood that Mao Zedong’s ideas were not suitable for every time and place—especially in economics.
He preserved the Communist Party as an instrument of stability while adopting the policy of “Reform and Opening Up,” opening the doors to trade, investment, and a market-oriented economy.
He saved both the regime and the country, paving the way for lifting hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty.
Today China is an immense river of progress and technology, occupying the position of the world’s second-largest economy.Deng was busy opening windows while safeguarding stability when the Iranian Revolution was born in the world of the two camps.
It is clear from today’s events that it has drawn no lessons—neither from Gorbachev’s experience nor from Deng’s.It is true that the Khomeinist revolution was born outside the dictionary of the Cold War camps.
But that does not mean it will be spared the heavy burden that time imposes on all revolutions, just as it does on individuals. The Iranian leadership acted as though its golden mission lay abroad rather than at home.
It believed it could reshape the features of the region.
It cannot be denied that its regional offensive achieved successes so striking that some of its generals boasted of holding the keys to four Arab capitals.
The Iranian revolution left its fingerprints deeply on Beirut, Damascus, Baghdad, and Sana’a.Yet the Iranian leadership grossly overestimated its own power and underestimated the West.
It did not anticipate that a man would enter the White House who would issue an order to assassinate General Qassem Soleimani.
It did not expect that same man to return to the Oval Office and order his aircraft to punish Iran because of nuclear enrichment and escalating regional tension.
It certainly never imagined that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government would dare send its warplanes to dominate Tehran’s skies and kill generals and scientists. The Iranian leadership did not realize that time had changed.
The surprise came from where they least expected.
Yahya Sinwar launched “Al-Aqsa Flood,” inflicting painful losses on Israel—but the flood soon reversed, striking Hezbollah in Lebanon, uprooting Bashar al-Assad’s regime, and sending its waves crashing onto Iran itself.This is not the first time the Iranian authorities have faced widespread street protests,
but it is the first time this has occurred after the severe damage done to Iran’s image by the disintegration of the “Axis of Resistance,”
after Syria chose the path of partnership with America and withdrawal from the military front with Israel,
and at a moment when the agenda in Gaza is the disarmament of Hamas, and in Lebanon—under softer terminology—the disarmament of Hezbollah.What applied to the Russian and Chinese revolutions applies necessarily to the Iranian one:
The wrinkles of age must be addressed.
A return is needed—from dreams and illusions to the world of facts and numbers.
A change in the language spoken to the people at home.
And the opening of windows to the outside world.The rule is clear and stark:
A revolution either gives birth to its own Deng Xiaoping—who saves it, reconciles it with its people, and brings it back into harmony with the world—
or it waits for its Gorbachev to arrive, bringing with him collapse.
Deng kept Mao’s mausoleum draped in respect, but he never allowed the founder to govern China from his grave.

nice looking?
?
any color you see
any text size you see
and font style
any positioning
etc . .
all of that beacuse of you, not me . . .
-

no changes for mt5 current version

all my effort on mt4 !! since my live account always mt4 . .
shawerma in mt4 has more shawerma buttons . .

irismonster

mt4:
and this part,, now: display in better way,, mouse off = word "mouse" = no more counter
mouse-clicks ON = allowed you will see tah counter S/xx/ss

Attached Image (click to enlarge)

remain only TP LADDER SYSTEM . . .

7 steps !! as explained month ago

mt4:
all main dash- input data grouped together . .
-