RSI-Trading (Nasdaq)

Quoting Trader131

Disliked

Yes, that works perfectly. But in your case, the equity reached the target before the balance, and triggered it. In my and Muchowsky's example, the BALANCE reached the target first, and made it reset the number, not the equity. And it should wait for the equity. Because as you say, equity is the most important. You are trading too well!

Ignored

Quote

Disliked

But in your case, the equity reached the target before the balance, and triggered it. In my and Muchowsky's example, the BALANCE reached the target first, and made it reset the number, not the equity. And it should wait for the equity. Because as you say, equity is the most important. You are trading too well!

Quoting Macd-rsi

Disliked

the test should be done in this way .. iam happy, that there are some mates understand it better than me , , {image} -

Ignored

Quoting Macd-rsi

Disliked

thank you brothers: muchowskY i realize the source of the problem{image}

Ignored

Quoting Trader131

Disliked

Here's another one coming up. I'm currently about $400 in drawdown, and the balance is nearing 24780, equity much lower. Waiting to see what happens when balance reaches 24780{image}

Ignored

Quoting Macd-rsi

Disliked

omaramir : at that day we solve that problem , but created another one .. but no worries, we have here a good thriller friends . . checking philosophers like muchowskY Trader131 and of course you and phu{image} muchowskY thank you very much .. are you: {image} -

Ignored