Don't waste your time trying to teach these people anything.
Now you know how an adult orangutan must feel when they are trying to teach their babies how to peel their first banana.
Pride always comes before destruction.... -Proverbs 16:18
Trading for silver Darwin 16 replies
Elliott Waves discussion 4 replies
Euro/Dollar discussion 9 replies
Forward Testing Discussion Thread 241 replies
Disliked{quote} I have had losing months and it doesn't cut my multiplier..... What cuts your multiplier is over leverage and holding too long, which is what most traders are doing when in DD. Especially a grid/martingale EA which holds and keeps adding....Hell yes, your risk multiplier will be crushed .....AS IT SHOULD I can see why you'd assume they are corelated, but they are not. If you continue to trade the same size while in DD, your risk multiplier will not change.......Hell, I'm coming off of a negative month and my multiplier just jumpoed to 2.27...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Fine, you are saying that the same strategy that helps you succeed at props will fail you at Darwinex because props don't punish you for your trading style like martingale or holding too long but Darwinex does. Can we agree on that?Ignored
Disliked{quote} For darwinex, Risk is not SL you put because SL is not gaurantee like swiss tsunami event. For darwinex, risk is leverage and volatility of the instrument. So, 1 lot with 10 pip SL is not same as 0.1 lot with 100 pip SL. How ever if you use consistently any one of above scenario risk factor doesn't change. You can't use above two scenario together and say my risk is same. This is where main difference of opinion lies.Ignored
Disliked{quote} For darwinex, Risk is not SL you put because SL is not gaurantee like swiss tsunami event. For darwinex, risk is leverage and volatility of the instrument. So, 1 lot with 10 pip SL is not same as 0.1 lot with 100 pip SL. How ever if you use consistently any one of above scenario risk factor doesn't change. You can't use above two scenario together and say my risk is same. This is where main difference of opinion lies.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have had losing months and it doesn't cut my multiplier..... What cuts your multiplier is over leverage and holding too long, which is what most traders are doing when in DD. Especially a grid/martingale EA which holds and keeps adding....Hell yes, your risk multiplier will be crushed .....AS IT SHOULD I can see why you'd assume they are corelated, but they are not. If you continue to trade the same size while in DD, your risk multiplier will not change.......Hell, I'm coming off of a negative month and my multiplier just jumpoed...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Ok let's talk about the statement in bold. I got a good example that you can better than anyone else relate to. Your oldest account...I don't have it in front of me but once near the beginning mb 1/3 or 1/4 in you had a kind of big tilt. I forget how much but it didn't look good. Practically next day or a couple days later your dd instantly recovered and you hit zero line and you were once again ATH. Then you I think geared it down and went on quick forays away from 0 line and back...you know..the good stuff that keeps the ATH up. So, point...Ignored
DislikedDoes the minimum return required in the current month to achieve the minimum rating of 75 decrease if you increase your total return from previous months? I'm currently at 3.14% in October, and according to the rating calculator, I need to reach 4.96% by the end of the calculation period. So, as of now, I'd be short 1.82%. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes, big time. I have had months where I start above 75 and can even lose up to 1% and still be above 75 and get an allocation.....the further along you go just making pretty minimal gains.....the easier it becomes. Gold is different, as it is scored on ONLY current month. However, I have checked, and 2% will get you the minimum 50K there as well.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you. Yes, I'll see if I can make it by the end of October. There isn't much time left, but hopefully I should be able to secure the first allocation by the end of November. I'm still looking at what I can optimize. As you say, changing the position sizes doesn't help. I simply need more profits. Trades should become more profitable relative to the risk. I think the risk is "okay". The maximum drawdown in Darwin is -4.05% and in the Signal account so far is -9.4%.Ignored
Dislikedhere is my report...... 657 total trades...... 4629 in commissions.....Ignored
QuoteDisliked"A strategy with a profit factor of 5 and a recovery factor of 10 is exceptionally profitable and resilient."
QuoteDisliked"A profit factor above 5 warrants caution and further investigation, especially if based on limited data, because it can indicate a strategy that is overly optimized or has not been tested under varied market conditions. While a profit factor between 1.75 and 4 is considered good to strong, values significantly higher than this range should be viewed with skepticism until verified against a sufficient sample size of trades and a variety of market conditions."
Disliked{quote} Very impressive metrics. Profit Factor: 5.68 Recovery Factor: 11.93 Over what period did you achieve this? {quote} {quote} Here is an excerpt from my MT5 report overview window for the Darwinex Zero account since launch to today. (05.08.25-24.10.25). However, I have the feeling that some of these metrics are not entirely accurate. The account's maximum peak-to-trough drawdown is actually -9.4% and not -2.58% as stated in the MT5 report. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Pip. Navigate to the "Reports" section via View > Reports or open the "Account History" tab in the "Toolbox" (Ctrl+T)Ignored