I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Quoting Godwin Igili

Disliked

Good BTE, MwIRCT and other coders Kindly add ON/OFF button to this indicator. Thank you {file}

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

Need the best symbol and timeframe changer for MT4? Here you go! WM4X-ChartChanger indicator Features: - Openable / Foldable (switch between them by pressing the main/central button) - Movable (click/release > move > click/release in the header) - Resizable - Selectable instrument list (All instruments / Market Watch instruments / Custom instrument list) - Direct selection by symbol and/or TF / Arrow navigation - Custom color selection - Screenshot with custom watermark (pictures are saved into the {Data Folder}/Files/ScreenShots folder) - Close...

Ignored

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} And why does your code delete my objects when I change Tfs by your buttons? That doesn't happen when I change Tfs with the MT4 tools, or with my changer.

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} It only deletes its own objects. Please, check again. You can see in the GIF image that the labels on the right remain unchanged and are not deleted (these do not belong to the ChartChanger objects).

Ignored

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} {image} Click on H4: Nothing happens for quite a while, just the wheel is turning, and then: {image} The Tf didn't change. Now I have to click again: {image} And only then everything happens. So, this is useless and can cause more problems than improvements.

Ignored

Quoting Georgebaker

Disliked

{quote} {file}

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} I can't reproduce what you described. The problem is probably on your side; you may need to revise the code that draws your buttons. Try dragging some objects from MT4 onto the chart (trendline, rectangle, triangle, etc.) and use ChartChanger. The chart change will be instant and flawless, and the objects will remain in place.

Ignored

Quoting Godwin Igili

Disliked

{quote} Thank you George. No External input to move the ON/OFF to desired position on chart Please, kindly share the mq4

Ignored

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} The problem is MT4 itself. I mean, it will work fine when only the changer is applied. The problem starts when we have, for example, 10 charts open and they are all working with the same template. With a number of indicators and an EA on each chart.

Ignored

Quoting Georgebaker

Disliked

{quote} No External input to move the ON/OFF to desired position on chart Please, - I will change that. Update. {file} If you need more changes let me know

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} I encountered a similar phenomenon in the past, and I was surprised too. But this problem can be eliminated by modifying your code. MT4 does not always "behave" as one would expect, but there is always a workaround. It's just not always easy to find. (Please, remove that "useless" statement from your post, it is misleading for others. ChartChanger works as expected, flawlessy. Thanks.)

Ignored

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} {file} I will do something else. I will provide the source code if anyone wants to create something similar to your version.

Ignored

ObjectsDeleteAll(chartID,objPrefix);

if(reason!=REASON_CHARTCHANGE)
      ObjectsDeleteAll(chartID,objPrefix);

Quoting Spank1969

Disliked

Ciao, puoi controllare perché i segnali non si aggiornano sul grafico, grazie. {file}

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} Your code contains some error (not syntactic, but theoretical/logical) that is not noticeable in normal circumstances, but appears in specific situations (when changing charts or templates). You need to review the initialization and/or deinitialization section in your code to fix it. This does not only apply to you; at least 95 percent of MT4 codes available on the internet are poorly written. This does not necessarily cause problems under normal circumstances, but it can occur in certain special cases, such as when changing charts or templates....

Ignored

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} I said the truth, and I will not say what you want me to say!

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} The truth is my program works perfectly, and the EA you are using is poorly written. This is the truth. So, do not mislead the people with false statement. If something is "useless", that is the EA you used, whether you wrote it or not. I even provided you with assistance to enable you to correct your EA. The least you could do is thank me for my help and do what I politely asked you to do. For my part, I consider this matter closed. Cheers.

Ignored

 if(reason!=REASON_CHARTCHANGE)

 
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+
void objectsDelete(string name)
{
   int objTotal = ObjectsTotal(ChartID());
   for(int i=objTotal-1; i>=0; i--)  
  {
      string objName = ObjectName(ChartID(),i);
      if(StringFind(objName,name,0) >= 0)
       ObjectDelete(0,objName);
   }
               ChartRedraw(ChartID());
}
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

Quoting BestTraderEv

Disliked

{quote} Nope, I removed the EA and the problem still persists. I did this exercise before, I removed all indicators and EAs and then added them one-by-one. The problem always starts showing at one point. I'm not saying that it's your code that creates the problem. I'm just saying that the problem persists no matter what we do when there are more indicators applied. Anyways, I don't see any reason why my EA would cause such a problem??? There is nothing special in the OnInit() and OnDeinit().

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} Yes. I provided you the solution here. Until there is only one program on the chart that is poorly written, the problem will persist. There can't be a weak link. Each one needs to be corrected individually (more precisely, each one should have been written correctly in the first place). Cheers

Ignored

Quoting WM4X

Disliked

{quote} Yes. I provided you the solution here. Until there is only one program on the chart that is poorly written, the problem will persist. There can't be a weak link. Each one needs to be corrected individually (more precisely, each one should have been written correctly in the first place). Cheers

Ignored