PA Trading with EMAs and common Sense

gold longs

gold again

can i just point out theres 2 kinds o common sense == preferred n all encompassing

the latter would tell u if the mix has too much speculation in it then its a poor choice to work with. the obvious eg for this one is treatin a chart as fact or !!delayed insight!!

the former would tell u its gamblin n to stay clear of it to find a real source for ur money to work n be useful

ppl luv testin things out in da good times. TRY testin in da bad times when real life spills over into ur trading views n actions n real life. THIS will tell u if ur usin common sense or not

if u do a history check charts werent created so common man could trade they were a tool designed for fiscal structures to measure over n under valuations of cost, value and performance. ppl ask or spit at me !!WHY!! i make fun o ppl n charts === THIS is why. ppl read what they want to read but NOT whats really there. so ppl speculate to try n MAKE IT WORK.

im not writin this to piss u off only to show the initial fault in the idea of usin charts to speculate

if this helps great if not then oh well. i tried

gbpusd long scalps

... cant we use this tool same way for our trading?

"show the initial fault in the idea of usin charts to speculate ..." do you dismiss charts completely or this one particular approach shown here?

GL
BN

if a person follows the actual real life food chain of connectivity between organized entities (eg broker right up through liquidity levels n beyond) you end up at the government level and corporate levels entertwined. ofc this knowledge is of no value to gamblers as they wanna have fun n !!make money!! === or try to anyway. thats what separates person of a gamble interest from real auditors or investigators of the money or financial markets n beyond. people say speccy vs invstor but thats a highly inaccurate comparison to make.

if u reread what i said here= charts have a purpose but there is the problem. theyre not for what ppl are pushed into doin with em. if u have all da instructions of what makes the chart look as it does, then u would see that a broker answers to someone, who answers to someone else, and so on right up to govt level in form of taxes, licenses, permits etc etc. when u do this it is now NOT about speculatin. speccys dont care bout this stuff bcoz they cant see how it gives em an !!edge!!. BUT if a person understands da world they inhabit, then speculation would be the LAST thing they want to be doin and in that, is the edge. its tangible, its consistent and it has always been there.

to make it simple here == every entity i wrote is there to create gain. even a govt. speccys focus on buy sell etc. but an entity always has to conform to rules regulations and timely audits or taxation. once you stop focussin on speccy buy sell stuff you free up the chart to want to see when the liq offerers or brokers have to do their required activities. and how this lines up with other asset classes and timeliness of requirements. brokers !!offer!! swap positive rates n overlay their fees with !!chances!! to win bigger or more. this is why the fx industry now is just one big advertisement. speccys cant see this on chart bcoz theyre waitin for da !!trend!! to line up with pos swaps so they can !!trade!! it. not sure if this answers ur question but it can give u a way to look at a chart differently. if da industry says !!stops hunts!! or !!trend breakout!! or !!divergence!! or anythin else like this then u know ppl will repeat it til they convince emselves its real. never was n never will be. its just REALLY good marketing.

anyway im sorry to da ppl who post here or da starter of this thread. didnt mean to appear to take over. someone asked n i replied. have fun

GU scalps after CPI news, +12% profit.

Gold buys

M1 BTCUSD

M1 XAUUSD

M1 XAUUSD - trend continuation!

M1 XRPUSD

M1 BTCUSD

M1 EURUSD

M1 XAUUSD

M1 XAUUSD

M1 BTCUSD

M1 BTCUSD

M1 XRPUSD

BTCUSD buys to start the day... small position early up high, thinking there would be a BO; larger lot sizes down low at the climactic hammer.