Power of Two System

Quoting HazHazHaz

Disliked

{quote} Hi Bazenga, what does it mean by "when price touches either of the 4hr range levels"?

Ignored

Quoting Bazenga

Disliked

{quote} Whenever you draw the ranges on the 4hr TF, those same ranges should also appear on the 15min TF. So when you are following the price on the 15 min TF, you should make sure that you are within the 4hr TF ranges. Then if the price in the 15 min TF moves and interacts with those 4hr ranges, that's when you pause, and go back to the 4hr TF to reevaluate. If this isn't clear, kindly go to Scott's channel on YouTube and watch all the videos there where he is isn't interviewing a trader. There are about 5 of those ones, currently. The concept...

Ignored

Quoting Paulscaff1

Disliked

{quote} Search for " ICT_Leaked_Courses " on telegram. Theres an evo markets leak on there, it will explain the basics of how to draw and adjust the ranges.

Ignored

Quoting Paulscaff1

Disliked

{quote} When the strategy was first introduced, there was no SFT, and no counter trades, it was simply either FT or NFT, and also there was no internal 15M range trades either, these were added in at a later date. Im assuming these add-ons of SFT trades, Counter Trades and Internal range trades were introduced to increase the trade frequency at the cost of lower probability. Even without testing, Ive got a hunch that only sticking to higher probability scenarios I.E FT/NFT, no countering, and no internal range trades will yield slightly better...

Ignored

Quoting Tibetian

Disliked

In Scott's latest youtube video he interviewed a guy that claimed to have killed every prop challange. He doesn't trade SFT. I am also as suspicious as you are, that all the new rules are introduced to get more trades. Three of them (Scott, Tom, Callum) are now awashed in cash from monthly subscriptions. They are making up BS rules on the fly now to explain why trades failed, but people know BS when they sees it, when pushed to a corner, their typical response: "Go do backtest yourself". {quote}

Ignored

Quoting FireScape

Disliked

I’ve personally stopped following the system, too much over fitting , that’s always the first sign of a failing system. Means fundamentally the concept at the core is not accurate. Using fractal breaks to confirm trend direction is not what the market is doing. Good luck all

Ignored

Quoting HazHazHaz

Disliked

{quote} Any system you are currently following Firescape?

Ignored

Quoting FireScape

Disliked

{quote} currently doing a prop firm challenge with my CPP strategy. Going okay, very accurate but the RR is to be desired. It’s also not a very engaging strategy to trade so still looking for something that satisfies that trading itch

Ignored

Quoting FireScape

Disliked

{quote} currently doing a prop firm challenge with my CPP strategy. Going okay, very accurate but the RR is to be desired. It’s also not a very engaging strategy to trade so still looking for something that satisfies that trading itch

Ignored

Quoting trungducsp2

Disliked

{quote} I used this system to pass Step 1 evaluation, but I personally feel that it is just luck, I feel that the system is not stable or because I do not understand it well enough. Using your CCP strategy for Step 2 of the prop firm. Current account: +2%. Note: For me, Testing on a small fund account helps me experience real market conditions better than backtesting.

Ignored

Quoting Patmontes

Disliked

{quote} Bro have you given a look at MMXM trading model? that's a higher timeframe model too

Ignored