He's finally HERE. Graalino expert.

An important note:
= due to very special nature of Forex market - there are numerous traders, huge banks here, including central
banks etc.,
= and because of uncertainty of this FX market,
= and due to high correlation of several currency pairs,
= because of maniputation on market (for example Swiss banks' manipulation for example NZD, and all pairs with CHF),
- As a result - it is absolutely mandatory to USE TRAILING STOPs on Forex Market.
Is it necessary for profitability - regardless of success of your core trading system.
A good trailing stop can make profitable any decent (not profitable yet) trading system.

New improved version 2.91 of Graalino-Pro expert.
New:
= improved math algorithm, increasing profits;
= added Trailing Stop - reducing drawdowns and increasing profitability;
= added Multi-Core processing (SMP), multithreading, 3-5 times faster optimization; this is unique for MT4 trading.
This is free 60-days version.

Modelling quality is NONE? Need to get 99% quality to be trustworthy.

This profitable expert works on a new bar only. It does not require "tick" modelling.
And in MT4's tester the "modelling quality" is applicable to "tick" modelling only, and is not applicable to "new bar" mode. Therefore the MT4 tester is not showing up "modelling quality" for any "new bar" expert, including this one.

New preset files for 13 major currency pairs with optimal profitable parameters for Graalino-Pro EA v.2.91:

New preset files for 26 (13+13) major currency pairs with optimal profitable parameters for Graalino-Pro EA v.2.91:
(trading on GBPPLN not recommended at this time)

Problem:
1). At the times like the present, when there is a stream of important news, when Central Banks are changing deposit rates etc. - it is important to choose/keep parameter "High_Range" as high (long range) as possible.
2). But in "Robust" mode using the "High_Range" parameter higher than 650 is impractical due to very low speed of optimization/trading. (We are working on this issue of low speed).
3). Therefore the solution: in modern times it is reasonable to use "Fast_Classic" mode with high "Range" parameter, despite the fact that slow "Robust" mode is generally more profitable.