The Last 2 Baskets of History. The EOS Configurations.

The following posts, are in response to this, but
in reality they are useful information for everyone.

I seguenti post, sono in risposta a questo, ma
in realtà sono informazioni utili a tutti.

THE GRAPH part 1:
What do you mean by "correlations"? Did you mean "corrections"?
Because in reality it is not possible to relate this type of Basket chart with anything else.
Then, for how this type of graph is constructed (unfortunately it's not my choice),
it is not even possible to use it as a study, for other strategies and other methods.
I know it's weird, but you can also see all positive (or negative) charts at once
so it can't be used like: "I see the Euro is very strong, so the others are weaker".
These charts could also give such an impression, but sadly this is not the case.

They are graphics that can and should only be managed as you see them.
And buy or sell that that show you and only using this EA (or one set up like this).
The standard conception of "I see the Dollar go up, then I invest in all USD pairs",
it would almost certainly cause you a loss.


IL GRAFICO parte 1:
Cosa intendi per correlazioni? Volevi dire correzioni?
Perché in realtà non è possibile correlare questo tipo di grafico Basket con altro.
Poi, per come questo tipo di grafico è costruito (purtroppo non è una mia scelta),
non è possibile neanche usarlo come studio, per altre strategie e altri metodi.
Lo so che è strano, ma è possibile vedere anche tutti grafici positivi contemporaneamente (o negativi)
quindi non può essere usato tipo:"Vedo che L'Euro è fortissimo, quindi le altre sono più deboli".
Questi grafici potrebbero anche dare un'impressione del genere, ma purtroppo non è così.

Sono grafici che possono e devono, solo essere gestiti così come li vedi. E acquistare o vendere quello
che ti fanno vedere e solo usando questo EA (o uno settato come questo).
La concezione standard del "Vedo il Dollaro salire, allora investo su tutte le coppie USD",
ti procurerebbe quasi di sicuro una perdita.

The EA:
Look ... I'm still holding the "secret", because honestly there is no "secret".
And the EA I use is a common button panel, for buying and selling, as well as many others.
Except that it does it in a "particular" way

It is something under the eyes of many, only it had not yet been seen.
Or if seen, no one has ever thought of looking for a comfortable way to use it, given that the tools used
until now, they didn't allow it. Not that easy.
Or whoever got there, used / uses, non-visual methods.
Or, if someone has gotten there, they are jealously guarding it only for themselves.
Or simply no one had succeeded in this work before.


L'EA:
Guarda... sto tenendo ancora il "segreto", perchè sinceramente non c'è nessun "segreto".
E l'EA che uso, è una comune pulsantiera per acquistare e vendere, così come tante altre.
Solo che lo fa in maniera "particolare"

È una cosa sotto gli occhi di molti, solo che non era ancora stata vista.
O se vista, nessuno ha mai pensato di cercare un modo comodo per usarla, visto che gli strumenti usati
fino ad ora, non lo permettevano. Non in maniera così facile.
O chi ci è arrivato, usava/usa, metodi non visuali.
Oppure, se qualcuno ci è arrivato, lo sta custodendo gelosamente solo per se.
O semplicemene nessuno era riuscito prima in questa opera.

THE DECISION PROCESS:
I get it. You want to know a preview of my decision making process.
Pretty much like any FX pair or other instrument.

There are mainly two schools of thought. For the first, I tell you what is right to do.
On any chart of any instrument:
- is there a strong tendency to rise?
- is it above all averages, from slowest to fastest?
- is it above 50% of its range today?
- is it also over the opening of the Asian Market? (the only data not detectable with this "Configuration")
- has it passed many important levels, which could have stopped the climb?
Including the last one you were keeping an eye on?
So as soon as you track, wait for the price to resume its upward movement and get 90-95%
of possibility of obtaining a profit. Guaranteed. Of course it is the opposite if the price goes down.

This is a school of thought. Then there is its inverse.
When the price is beyond its "normal" movement, it tracks or reverses. Guaranteed.
Precisely because sooner or later you track, sell at a maximum (possibly on an extreme level) and take profit.
Does the price continue to rise? Continue selling to the next most important levels.
If you know what you are doing, if you have good reliable levels, if you can manage the appearance correctly
monetary / investment risk, it is no more risky than the other version.
It is considered more dangerous, only by those who cannot use it.
And it is much easier, and I mean a lot, on synthetic currency charts than on any other instrument.

I use both techniques indifferently, depending on the opportunities I see on the graph.
Here, yes, experience takes over a bit. Being able to see all the possibilities there are at 360 °.
Then the mistake is always around the corner and I'm not perfect. In fact, maybe 2 days out of three I start with a loss.
But if the price doesn't go one way, maybe it goes the other way. Elementary?
But I must admit, that the contrarian school is the one I love the most and if I have the opportunity, I take it immediately,
remaining more serene and relaxed than to trade in trend.
But this is me and I don't recommend it to anyone because if you make a mistake and you can't handle it, you're in shit up to your neck.
Monetary management / investment risk we will see on another occasion.


IL PROCESSO DECISIONALE:
Ho capito. Vuoi sapere in anteprima il mio processo decisionale.
Praticamente come per qualunque coppia FX o altri strumenti.

Esistono prevalentemente due scuole di pensiero. Per la prima, ti dico quello che è giusto fare.
Su qualunque grafico di qualunque strumento:
- è in forte tendenza a salire?
- è sopra tutte le medie, dalla più lenta a quella più veloce?
- è sopra il 50% del suo range di oggi?
- è anche sopra l'apertura del Mercato Asiatico? (l'unico dato a non essere rilevabile con questa "Configurazione")
- ha superato molti livelli importanti, che avrebbero potuto fermare la salita?
Compreso l'ultimo che stavi tenendo d'occhio?
Allora appena rintraccia, aspetta che il prezzo riprenda il suo movimento a salire e ottieni il 90-95%
di possibilità di ottenere un guadagno. Garantito. Naturalmente è l'opposto se il prezzo scende.

Questa è una scuola di pensiero. Poi c'è il suo inverso.
Quando il prezzo è oltre il suo movimento "normale", rintraccia o si inverte. Garantito.
Proprio perchè prima o poi rintraccia, vendi a un massimo (possibilmente su un livello estremo) e prendi profitto.
Il prezzo continua a salire? Prosegui nella vendita ai livelli più importanti successivi.
Se sai cosa stai facendo, se hai dei buoni livelli affidabili, se riesci a gestire correttamente l'aspetto
monetario/rischio d'investimento, non è più rischiosa dell'altra versione.
Viene considerata più pericolosa, solo da parte di chi non riesce a usarla.
Ed è molto più facile, e dico molto, sui grafici sintetici delle Valute, che su qualsiasi altro strumento.

Io uso indifferentemente entrambe le tecniche, a seconda delle opportunità che vedo sul grafico.
Qui si, che subentra un po' l'esperienza. Il riuscire a vedere a 360° tutte le possibilità che ci sono.
Poi l'errore è sempre dietro l'angolo e io non sono perfetto. Anzi, forse 2 giorni su tre inizio con una perdita.
Ma se il prezzo non va da una parte, forse va dall'altra. Elementare?
Devo pero ammettere, che la scuola del contrarian è quella che amo di più e se ho l'occasione, la colgo subito,
rimanendo più sereno e rilassato che a operare in tendenza.
Ma questo sono io e non lo consiglio a nessuno perchè se sbagli e non la sai gestire, sei nella merda fino al collo.
La gestione monetaria/rischio d'investimento lo vedremo in altra occasione.

THE TRACING:
Look at all the charts I have posted previously. Study them carefully.
How many V's do you see straight or inverted? How many times has the price moved decisively and then returned to the same level or beyond?
It is like this every day on one currency or another. This is why it is important to have all 8 charts open at the same time
and in front of your eyes. You can grasp every possibility right from the start and there are dozens of them within 24 hours.
But I am old and tired. After 10 years, I no longer want to continue with a Trading that has become heavy for me.
Since, for a few weeks, I only worked on 4 charts and neglected the other 4, I decided, for myself, to use only these 4.
But a younger person with more interest should start with the full pattern at 8. And then, after that, choose what they want
and what it does for him. 4 couples .... only 2 or even only 1 if you prefer. Doing the opposite starting from 1, however, I think it is absurd.
Everyone is free to choose anyway. I'm not the starter who forces everyone to follow his rules and post pictures
that perfectly reflect your setup. Everyone will be free to work and publish images with their own preference.
The only thing I ask is not to overturn the system with changes that have nothing to do with the original.
If that's what one wants, open your thread.


I RINTRACCIAMENTI:
Guarda tutti i grafici che ho pubblicato in precedenza. Studiali con attenzione.
Quante V vedi diritte o rovesciate? Quante volte il prezzo si è spostato deciso e poi è ritornato allo stesso livello o oltre?
È così ogni giorno su una Valuta o sull'altra. Per questo è importante avere tutti e 8 i grafici aperti contemporaneamente
e di fronte ai tuoi occhi. Puoi cogliere fin dall'inizio, ogni possibilità e c'è ne sono a decine nell'arco di 24 ore.
Ma io sono vecchio e stanco. Non ho più voglia dopo 10 anni, di continuare con un Trading diventato per me, ormai pesante.
Visto che, per alcune settimane, operavo solo su 4 grafici e trascuravo gli altri 4, ho deciso, per me, di usare solo questi 4.
Ma una persona più giovane e con più interesse, dovrebbe iniziare con lo schema completo a 8. E poi, dopo, scegliere cosa vuole
e cosa fa per lui. 4 coppie.... solo 2 o anche solo 1 sola se preferisce. Fare il contrario partendo da 1, lo ritengo però assurdo.
Tutti liberi comunque di scegliere. Non sono lo starter che obbliga tutti a seguire le sue regole e a pubblicare immagini
che rispecchiano perfettamente il proprio setup. Ognuno sarà libero di lavorare e pubblicare immagini con la propria preferenza.
L'unica cosa che chiedo è di non stravolgere il sistema con modifiche che non hanno niente a che vedere con l'originale.
Se è quello che uno vuole, apra il proprio filo.

AN EXAMPLE IN PRACTICE:
Let's take today (the other days are similar anyway).
Two concurrent and counter-trend trades on GBP and EUR which are very weak and are falling significantly in the early afternoon.
Market entry on an appropriate level.
I close GBP on the first level encountered, after a quarter of an hour and with a + 1.30%.
While the Pound started to swing with good waves (from one of them my gain) the Euro continued to fall.
I know the lower levels, I evaluate the range of movement, I study the most reliable supports and I wait for the right moment to go into correction.
I corrected 3 times and increased a fourth time, at a higher price, until it was close to the first level I thought the price was going to.
I wanted to hold on, and I was also ready to suffer a loss if I was wrong, but the price began to show signs of fatigue,
I had been on this operation for three hours now and it was Friday afternoon. It was starting to get dangerous
Risking loss is one thing. Going for loss is another.

So as soon as I saw +1.4 +1.5% I went out and was only one bar from that level. Patience, however a sure gain in your pocket.
It goes without saying that not only did the price hit that level, but the next two as well.
It could have been a big loss or a big gain. I preferred to take my "safe and modest" earnings as well
continue like this day after day. Less risk.
If I work against the trend, I also work against the Moving Averages, but this is obvious. In this case the Averages become S / R points,
as well as giving a 3D image to the chart, placing the price in space.
Has anyone noticed, that there are no time and price bars on the chart? With the naked chart, how do you determine the price position?
The Averages give an important reference and are actively used in the above mentioned case, of work on the trend.


UN ESEMPIO IN PRATICA:
Prendiamo oggi (gli altri giorni sono comunque simili).
Due operazioni contemporanee e in contro-tendenza, su GBP e EUR che sono molto deboli e che stanno scendendo di molto nel primo pomeriggio.
Entrata a Mercato su un livello appropriato.
Chiudo GBP sul primo livello incontrato, dopo un quarto d'ora e con un +1.30%.
Mentre la Sterlina ha cominciato a oscillare con buone onde (da una di queste il mio guadagno) l'Euro ha continuato a scendere.
Conosco i livelli inferiori, valuto l'ampiezza del movimento, studio i supporti più affidabili e aspetto il momento giusto per entrare in correzione.
Ho corretto 3 volte e incrementato una quarta volta, a un prezzo superiore, fino a andare vicino al primo livello a cui pensavo arrivasse il prezzo.
Volevo tenere duro, ed ero pronto anche a subire una perdita, se mi fossi sbagliato, ma il prezzo ha cominciato a dare segni di stanchezza,
io ero ormai da tre ore su questa operazione ed era Venerdi pomeriggio. Cominciava a diventare pericoloso
Rischiare la perdita è una cosa. Andare a cercare la perdita è un'altra.

Così appena ho visto un +1.4 +1.5% ho chiuso ed ero solo a una barra da quel livello. Pazienza, comunque un guadagno sicuro in tasca.
Inutile dire che non solo il prezzo ha toccato quel livello, ma anche i due successivi.
Poteva essere una grande perdita o un grande guadagno. Io ho preferito prendere il mio "sicuro e modesto" guadagno e
proseguire così giorno dopo giorno. Meno rischi.
Se opero in contro-tendenza, lavoro anche contro le Medie Mobili, ma è scontata la cosa. In questo caso le Medie diventano punti S/R,
oltre a dare un'immagine 3D al grafico, posizionando il prezzo nello spazio.
Qualcuno ha notato, che non ci sono le barre del tempo e del prezzo sul grafico? Con il grafico nudo, come stabilisci la posizione del prezzo?
Le Medie danno un riferimento importante e vengono attivamente usate nel caso sopra citato, di lavoro sulla tendenza.

THE LEVELS:
Other very important elements are certainly the levels. The price is amazing how you respect them.
Absurd how the price touches a level where it had reversed weeks ago, and reverses exactly there again.
Incredible, because it is not a couple that is usually dealt with, but a compound chart that nobody uses.
As well as% levels or Fibonacci tracking. Always look at the graphs I have posted. Check how the price (for example)
bounce up on a price level and down on an Average, to move back up to the% level and bounce again.
All this in theory would not be logical on this type of chart, because they are charts that do not exist. Just as there are no price levels.
All 8 currency charts oscillate between 250 and 350. But 250 350 of what? We are talking about EUR which has one value and the Yen another.
Yet they are all in this range. I do not know. However, I do know that I see the chart very often bounce off these levels and over time.
So they have an importance and this is enough for me.


I LIVELLI:
Altri elementi molto importanti, sono di sicuro i livelli. Il prezzo è incredibile come li rispetti.
Assurdo come il prezzo tocchi un livello dove aveva invertito settimane fa, e inverta di nuovo esattamente li.
Incredibile, perché non si tratta di una coppia che che viene trattata di solito, ma di un grafico composto che nessuno usa.
Così come i livelli % o il rintracciamento di Fibonacci. Guarda sempre i grafici che ho postato. Verifica come il prezzo (per esempio)
rimbalzi in alto su un livello di prezzo e in basso su una Media, per tornare a spostarsi fino a livello % e rimbalzare di nuovo.
Tutto questo in teoria non sarebbe logico su questo tipo di grafici, perché sono grafici che non esistono. Così come non esistono livelli di prezzo.
Tutti e 8 i grafici delle valute, oscillano tra 250 e 350. Ma 250 350 di cosa? Parliamo di EUR che ha un valore e lo Yen un'altro.
Eppure sono tutti in questo range. Non lo so. So però che vedo molto spesso il grafico rimbalzare su questi livelli e più volte nel tempo.
Quindi un'importanza c'è l'hanno e questo mi basta.

THE GRAPH part 2:
But even more incredible, and something I haven't said yet, is that the graph repaints. Not drastically, but it repaints.
Both in real time and on the history. So how can I trust all the levels I apply to the chart if those levels aren't the real ones?
I can't explain it, yet they work regularly. Everyday. All day. On all charts.
This goes beyond any hypothesis of a fortuitous combination. It just works. I'm not interested in anything else.


IL GRAFICO parte 2:
Ma ancora più incredibile, ed è una cosa che ancora non ho detto, è che il grafico ridipinge. Non drasticamente, ma ridipinge.
Sia in tempo reale, che sullo storico. E allora come faccio a fidarmi, di tutti i livelli che io applico al grafico, se quei livelli non sono quelli reali?
Non riesco a spiegarlo, eppure funzionano regolarmente. Ogni giorno. Tutto il giorno. Su tutti i grafici.
Questo va oltre ogni ipotesi di combinazione fortuita. La cosa funziona e basta. Non mi interessa altro.

AVERAGE THE PRICE:
To conclude, I return to the original question. If you meant "correct" and not "correlate", the explanation is this:
averaging the price at a loss is 100 times better than averaging the price at a profit (but you can't say "mediate" when it increases).
The difference is the BE (Breack even). You bring it closer to the current price either way.
But if it is an advantage when you are at a loss, because you have a better chance of going into the gain, it is a disadvantage when you are making a profit.
Each time you increase, you bring the BE closer and closer to the current price. A small reversal and you are quickly closing.
It makes no sense, knowing that the price fluctuates. That the price zigzags all the time.

Stupid example:
you buy 1 unit at 100, the price goes up to 200 and you have a "mat" worth 100. At 200 you buy again. Your BE is no longer at 100, but 150. If you then make the mistake of buying 2,
your BE is considerably closer to the current price and you risk a fast closing at any time.
It is true that you make money, but it seems that everyone makes or wants to make 1: 2 - 1: 3 - 1: 5.
If you are aiming for a long move, and you are confident of your entry, it is better to invest 3 now, rather than 1 and then 2. You are more likely to be able to make those results.


MEDIARE IL PREZZO:
Per concludere, ritorno alla questione iniziale. Se intendevi "correggere" e non "correlare", la spiegazione è questa:
mediare il prezzo in perdita, è 100 volte meglio, di mediare il prezzo in guadagno (ma non si può dire "mediare" quando si incrementa).
La differenza è il BE (Breack even). Lo avvicini al prezzo attuale in entrambi i casi.
Ma se è un vantaggio quando sei in perdita, perché hai più possibilità di andare in gain, è uno svantaggio quando sei in guadagno.
Ogni volta che incrementi, avvicini sempre di più il BE al prezzo corrente. Una piccola inversione e sei velocemente in chiusura.
Non ha senso, sapendo che il prezzo oscilla. Che il prezzo si muove a zigzag in continuazione.
Esempio stupido:
compri 1 unità a 100, il prezzo sale fino a 200 e hai così un "materassino" di valore 100. A 200 compri di nuovo. Il tuo BE non è più a 100, ma 150. Se poi fai l'errore di comprare 2,
il tuo BE è notevolmente più vicino al prezzo attuale e si rischia una chiusura veloce in qualsiasi momento.
È vero che guadagni, ma sembra che tutti facciano o vogliano fare 1:2 - 1:3 - 1:5.
Se punti a un lungo movimento, e sei sicuro del tuo ingresso, è meglio investire 3 da subito, piuttosto che 1 e poi 2. È più probabile che si riesca a fare quei risultati.

Grazie per i post che hai fatto,sì in realtà ti stavo proprio chiedendo la correlazione ( EUR forte, allora le monete avverse sono deboli etc etc ),comunque dovrei aver capito il funzionamento,ovviamento aspetto per i prossimi esempi più pratici.
In realtà volevo chiederti che cosa faceva l'EA ma avevo paura che non avevi voglia di dirlo adesso o che comunque più avanti l'avresti detto,quindi era inutile chiedertelo xD.Aspetto nuovi post,non so quanto riuscirò a stare dietro a tutto dato che sono fra poco avro' l'esame( 5' superiore ) ed è un po' complicato data la miriade di robe che ho da fare..
Saluti !
Thanks for the post you've done,yes i was actually asking you the correlation in sense of , EUR is strong,then the opposite pairs are going to be weak etc..I think i've understood the working of the method approximately,i'll wait for further practical examples and development.
Actually i wanted to ask you what is the task of the EA,but i was thinking that you might didn't want to say it now,or anyway you would have say it further on,so it was useless asking for it now...I'll wait new post,but i don't know if i'll manage to follow the thread since i'll soon have the exam ( italian 3th grade school exam) and it is a bit difficult since i have to do lots of stuff...
Regards !

Today's results (only 42 minutes):
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
6st positive day after loss:
0.21 lots invested and divided into 3 total Sets, opened in several phases.
Total accumulated pips = +94.0
Max DD = -0.41% (derived from one operations and one gains)
Account gain = + 2.38%

So many things today (again).
I said I was going to disappear for a while, but if I update after a week or two,
all the news and changes, I would stay busy only on this for a full day.
Better two or three hours a day (the time it takes for posts like this).

On Sunday I installed a new portable MT4, in order to have all the images
necessary for the detailed guide that is being prepared.

On Sunday I also configured the my intermediate monitor, for the 8 EA and 4 chats configuration.
Not for configuring 1-8 EA 8 charts. Small problem:
I have to find a way to make and explain how to prepare an MT4 on any monitor.
Because the way I used until yesterday, for my 32" Ultrawide 2K monitor,
it does not work on the 17" Widescreen FHD monitor and consequently on any other monitor.
I continue with the study.

Also on Sunday, I reactivated one of my old dormant accounts, as I promised in a previous post.
The purpose is to test the "System", in a further different environment, compared to the previous ones.
From the Broker's Dashboard, I knew I had 1:1000 leverage up a commission-free account.
On this account, the commission income is integrated in the spread.
Then check the behavior of the charts with a larger spread, but with the economic results, cleaned by the commission.
I also had a chat with an operator who, seeing what I saw, confirmed leverage and characteristics of the account.
Instead yesterday, first day of the test on this account, entered the first set of operations,
I could see that the leverage is 1:500 and not 1:1000. And I don't need another 1:500 account.
Thankfully I hadn't funded this account further yet, but I was using a residual of deposit,
several years old + a bonus of the same period.
So things get pretty interesting. And even more difficult.
€38.87 deposit + €19.48 bonus = possibility to use €58.35.

Maximum 4 sets of purchase, using all the availability of the account.
This means inserting operations with surgical precision or obtaining the failure of the account.
Really a small margin of movement.

So for the 1:1000 account and its performance, I'll have to postpone. I am already managing 5 accounts. No ... 4.
Finally today I managed to eliminate that famous account, which has not wanted to die for more than 10 days. Yippee!
However, they will be back very soon 5, because I discovered, after a thorough check of everything I have since 2012,
to have a few Euros in different Crypto. A pleasant surprise. But I will talk about this in a future post.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday, first day without loss on this "new" account, which I now use to enter the Market when I feel comfortable
there is a good opportunity, but not enough to enter operations on the "official" account, I intend to grow until I can.
Today after the first earnings, I was also able to insert on the YEN Currency, 5 sets for a total use of the deposit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today's results ("official" account):
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
7st positive day after loss:
0.76 lots invested and divided into 11 total Sets, opened in several phases.
(sometimes I find myself with fewer single trades. The Broker does not take them for different reasons)
Total accumulated pips = +132.10
Max DD = -1.52% (with all trades in profit and no loss)
Account gain = +2.22%


Results after the first two days ("new" account):
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
2st positive day after start:
1.33 lots invested and divided into 19 total Sets, opened in several phases: total 2 day
Total accumulated pips = +215.60 : total 2 day
Max DD = -17.84% (with all trades in profit and no loss)
Account gain = +37.30% : total 2 day

Even if the images of the two accounts are of different sizes, a big difference should be visible in the graphs,
which is caused by the different spread.

One is a more detailed, but "noisy" graph ... with more chances and more movement speeds.
The other is less detailed, but precise .... fewer occasions because it is much slower.

These tests also serve this purpose.
However, although they are different, they both respond very well on their levels. This is also a pleasant surprise.

Big .... big news today.

After several days, I was finally watching a movie last night. One of the few ways I have to relax.
Exactly in the middle of the film, the ending is practically revealed, so I lost interest, I'm done and I have
I started thinking about what I could still do before going to sleep.
Another movie? A little music? Nothing and go to sleep right away?
No .... better open an MT4 and solve the problem of dividing the screen into equal parts, for the "Configuration".
I must be sick. For sure.
Anyway within 10 minutes I was done. One less problem.

This afternoon, however, an explosion of Energy. The last time I felt this way, it was about 12 years ago when, after some
weeks studying how to apply in the best possible way, a tool to a vertical panel saw I was designing, suddenly
here it is ... the classic "stroke of genius" and I had solved it in a second.
I have a bad memory, but I remember like it was yesterday, that I turned on my stereo to full blast and started dancing
like a Shaman possessed by Spirits, all over the room... only it was HOUSE MUSIC

Something similar happened today. Have you ever seen lightning in a clear sky? It's an amazing thing, it makes your eyes go wide
and you find yourself amazed and with your mouth open to ask yourself << What ????? >>.

I was in the same normal situation every day. With the "new" account under pressure and with all the cartridges available
now too quickly used and with a heavy DD.
Instead on the "official" account, the situation was under control, still good possibilities of maneuver and of course in DD.
I remind you that whatever style or technique you can use, you are in DD a split second after opening an order. Always.

Anyway, I was thinking about how to improve my entry and which system was better, to close the sets placed in the Market.
I was fed up, in the final, of always seeing (and I always say) that I only earned a portion of what I could have earned.
The graph has always (and I repeat always) went well beyond my closing point.

I was calm when ... damn ..... I remembered a quote, put in the middle of a large speech, from an old Trader.
A post read about 6-8 years ago.
At that moment I hadn't given importance to this "pearl", but I remember thinking about it for some time, until it disappeared
from my attention. I didn't understand it and/or didn't know how to apply it.

Literally in a flash, that simple phrase came to mind and I understood everything. Suddenly the "Gates of Heaven had opened wide
I was aware that I had found one of the last pieces of the puzzle, for a better and certainly more profitable Trading.
There will always be losses, but it will be something else entirely.

This "solution", unfortunately arrived when I was in an advanced state of Trading and I could only manage the current situation.
But anyway, I saved the critical situation on the "new" account and at least doubled the usual % profit on the "official" account.
I thought about it and expressed it within me, with strong intensity. Now I also want to write it. Thanks Universe. Thank you.

Today's results ("official" account): 5 Hours work
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
8st positive day after loss:
0.49 lots invested and divided into 7 total Sets, opened in several phases.
Total accumulated pips = +212.10
Max DD = -4.45%
Account gain = +4.78%


Results day ("new" account): 5 Hours work
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
3st positive day after start:
0.54 lots invested and divided into 8 total Sets, opened in several phases:
Total accumulated pips = +30.40
Max DD = -30.76%
Account gain = +4.57%

Hi Trader-IT,

congratulations on your nice results! You are developing your system nicely. It seems very complex.


I wonder if you can take advantage of the new strategy ("inspiration") in the next days. I hope it will go well.

Do you use fundamental analysis?


good luck and thx for your hard work

Hi Tokken.
No. Nothing complex and no analysis.
How to use this "Configuration" is written a few posts above:
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...0#post13549020
I look at what the graph tells me and act accordingly.
I will write it again many times. Unfortunately.

But yes. Starting tomorrow I will use "Illumination", what I remembered today and which is a piece that is part of
the learning of years and years of study and research, valid for every style / type / strategy of Trading. Let's see how it goes.

However, no expectations for the "new" account. It is really too small.
If with the "official" account, I invest every set about 5-7% (more than acceptable) and I have about 14 sets available,
with the "new" account I invest about 25% each set and I only have 4-5 (EDIT: 3 with GBP-max 5 with YEN) sets available. The mistake is really around the corner.

(correction)
removed notice that reported multiple posts for new guide "MT4 Portable". Finished after 9 hours.

Hi Trader-IT,

By complex, I meant a well-constructed logical system.

Yes, unfortunately I slipped over the information of your decision process. But I am going to make a cheat sheet of your descriptions, because all those information are important part of your system.

I hope you can keep your "new" account alive as well.

i'll wait for your further updates

Regards

Hi Tokken.
Quiet ... I see that you follow me regularly every day. Do not worry.
At the right time, I'll do yet another recap.

However, I no longer intend to talk more about my way of Trading.
It is very dangerous and not necessary to make great profits.

I will only illustrate examples of ideal inputs, which occur dozens of times each day, on all the different currencies.
The fewer Currencies you see, the lower the chances.

The following, does not refer to you in particular, nor to anyone else in particular, but ... no example should be needed.
Because a Trader who does not know how to use Moving Averages or Levels, is not a Trader.
Even without having ever done Trading, I do not think it is possible, that in a person's life,
never happened to see a chart or never knew what a Average is.
Yet the word "AVERAGE" itself says so. No? Not even in a movie? From a friend ... from a merchant?
If you think you are a Trader, why do you use a "Magic Grail of Indicator" which draws the "Magic arrow" on the chart or
draw the "magic dot" on the chart, you are not a Trader.
A Monkey or a Mouse can be trained in a short time to do the same thing.
And with profit. Multiple studies and experiments have confirmed this.
Now, everyone should ask themselves "who or what am I?".

Returning to this "Configuration", for sure, go further along
"go farther by going with the current, than by rowing against the current". Better and safer trading.

Only I'm old and stupid.
Not to get bored and to keep alive and active my brain, I create unnecessary problems and then complain that I could do more ...
that I have worked too many hours ... that I am tired ... that I am stressed.
Well ... I cry all the time on Forex Factory like a stupid baby.

Avoid you and everyone, these unnecessary problems. Look (again and again) all the images I posted:
exit the Moving Averages in favor of the Trend.
If you can, use layers:
- as confirmation (with or without the MA) or
- as an additional starting point (with or without MA) or
- as a stop point (with or without MA).

It is also true that you can safely avoid levels.
It is also true that you can only use levels and not use MAs.
Everything is valid and profitable and it is everyone's free choice, what to use and how.
There is no best method, let alone the perfect one.

But one thing is certain:
if you use this "Configuration" with a minimum of brain and not with feet,
you get to collect pips with a Bulldozer, because a simple shovel is not enough for you anymore.

Unfortunately, I don't always use my brain, but the other "head" and the error that causes a big loss, is always waiting for me around the corner.
Don't be like me.

02) to have for emergency and daily use, all your MT4s in "portable" form (why and how). (Part 4)
AND
03) How to install a portable MT4 and how to better manage it.

I have combined these two chapters into one, as it was right to do.
Instead of publishing dozens of posts on this Thread and distracting everyone from the main topic, the "Configurations",
I decided to open a new Thread dedicated exclusively to this topic, which I consider fundamental, to make a Trader and his life as a Trader better.
You can find it all here:
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...t4mt5-portable

Updated on Thursday 27 May and Friday 28 May 2021.

I was unable to update this thread yesterday for several reasons.
The little time I was able to dedicate to FF was spent asking questions about my new Thread.
Thread that I opened and (almost finished) in 5 continuous hours, for a total of 51 posts.
But on Wednesday 26th night, it took me more than 3 hours to prepare all the material.
So it was almost 9 hours of continuous work, just for that.
A massacre, after a whole day of Trading on different accounts + FF + many other things.
I had to do it though and I did.

After nearly 22 hours on the computer, I was only able to sleep 6 hours and started Trading at 13:00 on Thursday.
Trading that I concluded (uninterrupted) this morning (Friday) at 05:00.
How many hours is it? 16 hours of continuous Trading? It was still time well spent.

Looking only at the "official" account of this Thread, I closed on Thursday with a result higher than +6.0%
and this Friday at dawn, with a further +2.20%. Not bad.
No Trading this afternoon. "By dint of pulling the rope, sooner or later it breaks." Better to avoid.
So just post on FF.

Instead the "new account" is, as I imagined only the day before, dead. Nothing wrong. It was truly an extreme test.
What happened?
Thursday was a special day, different from the last few weeks.
There were some unexpected and important news at the same time, which greatly influenced part of the Market.
A Trader who was only looking at an FX pair will probably have seen something, sure, but the real range of the movements,
it could only be observed by looking at whole Currencies.

The currencies affected were the Pound and the Yen, with movements greater than the last week combined.
GBP rose in favor, while the Yen fell heavily and almost non-stop.
Anyone who looked at GBPJPY, I think he saw something.

I was "contrarian" on both Currencies:
I sold the Pound and bought the Yen all afternoon.
This should let you know what I mean by "contrarian". Going against the Trend.

I started immediately with a "new" account, placing a set on GBP, but, having increased its value dramatically,
instead of having 4-5 sets available to manage the Trading, I ended up with only 3 sets.
If I had written in other posts that 4-5 were very few for my style, 3 were absolutely insufficient.
No room for maneuver. As she continued to rise, the Pound wiped out the tiny account.
One thing that of course would not have happened, operating in favor of the trend.
A style that I have promoted in the past and which I continue to recommend.

While on the "official" account, having 17 sets available, you can well understand that I don't have these problems.
Although it was not necessary to use all of them.
The maximum use, which took place with the last Trade executed on the JPY, was 7 sets (42 single Trades).

Today I have not done Trading anymore (it's Friday and I am destroyed) and on Monday, which is the last of the month,
I think I will also take a break.

These are the total results of the "official" account:

Overall results of the last two days ("official" account):
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
10st positive day after loss:
1.05 lots invested and divided into 15 total Sets, opened in several phases.
Total accumulated pips = +409.00
Max DD = -1.68%
Account gain = +8.91%


Results ("new" account): dead

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results last week:
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
2.51 lots invested and divided into 36 total Sets, opened in several phases.
Total accumulated pips = +847.20
Max DD = -4.45%
Account gain = +19.43%


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results for the month of May (first operation 6 May - 3 days less than trading on the whole month):
Usual REAL account (self-limited results):
13.62 lots invested and divided into 195 total Sets, opened in several phases (1362 total single operations).
Total accumulated pips = +356.90
Max DD = -33.66%
Account gain = -8.28%


Monthly result still negative, but I see the glass as half full:
17 days of trading and only 2 days of loss:
10 May -24.99% due to a serious technical problem
May 15th -13.02% for my trading errors (but I had a positive result the day before +11.23%)
since the last loss, in 10 days I made a + 32.36% with 1260.90 pips.
I'm happy so.