Inserted Video
- #9,324
- Edited 6:55am Oct 29, 2020 6:41am | Edited 6:55am
- | Commercial User | Joined Dec 2014 | 14,165 Posts
- #9,325
- Edited 7:45am Oct 29, 2020 7:35am | Edited 7:45am
- | Commercial User | Joined Dec 2014 | 14,165 Posts
Whats your best money management method? 52 replies
How to flow with the order flow? 26 replies
Money Management / Risk Management 24 replies
Money management model for multiple strategy trading method 16 replies
Most popular money management method. 7 replies
Disliked{image}{image} Good morning Forex Traders !!! I have finished my Forex trades for today having earned over $2000.00 US Dollars. There has now been 56 trades done since September 13, 2020 when this FXCM UK $50,000 US Dollars demo account was opened by one of my pupils. 53 of the trades made were profitable with 3 losses. This account has been open for 46 days now 3 days less than 7 weeks. The NET PROFIT is $20,365.54 US Dollars or 40% return on investment in less than 60 days. My usual average is 20% monthly or 240% annually.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Update: After 49 days or seven weeks of Forex trading since September 13, 2020 with 60 trades done and just 3 losses which is a 95% winning percentage. The total net profit is $22,697.34 US Dollars. That is over 44% return on investment or 22% monthly. That is an annual return of 264%. I could say that I am the number one Forex trader in the world however I will not. Smile Bruce Warren Margolese President/CEO Aviel Forex Learning Edge Corporation 438 994 1659Ignored
The report describes a measurement for showing the relationship between the number of votes Biden wins by (or loses by) in any given vote dump, and how well he did as a ratio of Trump’s votes in that vote dump, while controlling for size and political lean of a state. It thus normalizes the data across states, allowing for apples to apples comparisons. The key mathematical reason why these vote spikes are anomalous is that for every large vote dump heavily favoring Biden in any given area, you also would expect to have smaller vote dumps in the same area which favor him by similar margins. Quoting from the report:
https://images.revcontent.com/revcon...6-21557030.jpg
The believability of these updates relies on the premise that the one or two most Biden-favoring parts of the state (perhaps by ballot type) were counted entirely in these two batches. If it cannot be shown that the ballots counted during these spikes were qualitatively different from all other vote updates in Michigan, then the results are likely too extreme along multiple dimensions to be accepted at face value. [Vote Integrity]
It goes on to describe how the same logic applies for the other updates as well. Large ballot dumps which heavily favor a candidate make sense, if there are also smaller ones which favor the candidate more. The “standardization” process used by the researchers here takes care of that, and shows how points up and to the right of the graph are the more “co-extreme” vote dumps, in the language of the report:
https://www.revolver.news/wp-content...e81d91f829.png
That dotted black line at the top is the 99.5th percentile. In other words, only one out of every two-hundred points are above it. The four vote dumps in question are all at or above the 99.92th percentile. With these ratios, if they were at the 99th percentile only, they would each be dragged down to the middle of the three lines shown. Critically, they account for more than the margin of victory in all three states, and thus forty-two electoral votes, and with them, the Presidency.
Making Sense of This
The analysis is incredibly dense but contains several key points, which American Patriots must remember in the coming days and weeks. The most important points are:
The burden of proof is now on Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, the Democratic party, and their various urban machine operatives to defend these results as legitimate. The on-the-ground circumstances in these states had been suspicious for weeks and warranted investigation in their own right. We now have the math to confirm our suspicions. This report, in winding sentences and hedged language, lays it bare for all of us to see: Joe Biden’s election “victory” relied on a fraudulent counting process in the dead of night.
The media has no interest in covering this, and indeed are trying actively to suppress it. An attempt to Google search for “precincts that stopped the count” makes this clear. The steal of this election, perpetrated in the middle of the night in several states, was allowed to happen only because of the extraordinary assistance given to the Democrats by Big Media and Big Tech. Nonetheless, thanks to what appears to be an anonymous group of researchers, we can definitively state what we knew all along:
President Donald J. Trump is the legitimate winner of this election. Republican state legislators in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia must refuse to seat electors for Joe Biden until a complete forensic audit has been conducted.
Never give up. Never back down. And never concede.
DislikedI don't know who this Abdul fella is but he, you, or anyone else should never be diddling around with penny stocks. it's basically Russian roulette and you will get "deer huntered" sooner or laterIgnored
Dislikedcongrats on the forex record, i just felt the need to make the point that penny stocks or "penny" stocks, aka anything less then $5 per share, should not be part of any responsible trader's portfolio ever.Ignored