Hello Bruce,
Prefect exit from SP500 today. Market spiked up right after positions were closed.
Prefect exit from SP500 today. Market spiked up right after positions were closed.
Whats your best money management method? 52 replies
How to flow with the order flow? 26 replies
Money Management / Risk Management 24 replies
Money management model for multiple strategy trading method 16 replies
Most popular money management method. 7 replies
What Happened: Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the School of Public health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo, Canada, recently stated that the COVID-19 fatality rate is the “worst miscalculation in the history of humanity.” Brown is currently completing his second doctorate degree this time in epidemiology at the University of Waterloo.
Not long ago, Brown published a paper in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, titled “Public health lessons learned from biases in coronavirus mortality overestimation.”
--> Help Support CE: Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Also, help us beat censorship! Click here to join.
In the paper he provides data and information he collected from his research, he compared informational texts from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to data from independent scientists and Congressional testimony. He states that “Results of this critical appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus mortality overestimation, most likely caused by misclassifying an influenza infection fatality rate as a case fatality rate.”
Below is a statement Brown recently gave to John C. A. Manley, a journalist who was the first to cover the story:
The subject of this article is disruptive, to say the least, although it is not as obvious from the title. The manuscript cites the smoking-gun, documented evidence showing that the public’s overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity, in my opinion. My manuscript underwent an intensive peer-review process. You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.
Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. You can read more about him here.
As many of you reading this may already be aware, a number of prominent scientists around the world have been “muzzled’ so to speak when it comes to their positions on COVID-19. Their YouTube videos have been censored, and they have not been given any air time on mainstream media. This has made it so only a few perspectives are aired to the masses. Mainstream media also began a ridicule campaign against these types of scientists, while organizations like Facebook and the World Health Organization (WHO) chose to censor anything that contradicts the WHO’s position.
Should we not have the opportunity to examine research and opinions for ourselves to determine our truth? Why are they being hidden from us? Why do we constantly rely on big organizations that have a track record of fraud and corruption?
Many topics are controversial, and experts sharing opinions on it should have the right to share their thoughts without them being labelled as false or incorrect.
Many have had trouble during COVID with fact checkers. Merely writing articles like this sharing science informed opinions shared by these scientists results in “fake news” strikes. We’re never really given an opportunity to discuss why something is false it seems, we simply are strong armed into removing our content. This particular article may be marked as false. But how can that be? How can sharing an expert opinion and information based on scientific data be “false” and deemed punishable? This is also something brought up in the video below.
While this censorship seems crazy, there’s another side to it. It is making more people aware of a big problem that exists today within science, politics and media – that is often not scientific, not honest and works to mislead people. The politicization of science has led to such things like people believing that products like Glyphosate are safe. We saw this in the past with things like Agent Orange, DDT, Tobacco and more. Products that are found to harm people, go through a 15 – 20 year period of denial before admissions come out and no one is held accountable. Science today isn’t about science, it’s about what can compliment the choices of big corporations that dominate government policy. Is science in this sense being used to help humanity thrive? Or is it used to make certain people wealthy at the expense of thee masses?
In the video below, Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, calls out the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring information. He’s also one of many scientists who have called into question the severity of the new coronavirus, as well he has criticized the lockdown measures that have been taken across the globe, explaining how it’s caused a lot of needless suffering and damage.
He also mentioned like other things could have been done, simply masks without lockdown might have been sufficient according to him, but I disagree. He also mentioned that lockdowns can be effective for the pandemic, but again, obviously feels it wasn’t necessary for this one.
Furthermore, he points to the politicization of science, and how we are being forced to make moves not based on data and science, but rather economics and politics.
When Dr. Ron Paul shared his opinion a few months ago that “People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “pandemic” could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic” he was censored and marked as false news, having his social media distribution limited.
NOTE: VIDEO WAS REMOVED. PLEASE SPEAK OUT. CONTACT YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT.
Bruce Warren Margolese
514 247 0775
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/tk21.jpg
Russia has to explain to Armenia that socialist Democrat Party leader Joe Biden is a dangerous demented joke.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/tk22.jpg
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/tk23.jpg
Manager Mike Fratantuono (above) describes what the socialist Democrats have done to him: “This is a family place — four generations and counting. I know every inch of pipe and wire we have running through here. I’ve been the plumber, the busboy, the handyman, the butcher, the bartender, the prep cook, the manager. I’ve done every job there is in this restaurant, and now I’m the one who has to shut us down”.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/tk24.png
DislikedThanks Bruce. I believe physiology and personality is big part of a successful trader. It will require training, experience and strict discipline to get there.Ignored
Dislikedhttp://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2020/...t-trading.html {image} What ingredients go into an ideal trading psychology? Here are a few that stand out in my experience: 1) Planning - Think of an elite boxer going into the ring with a plan; a football or basketball team that plans for an opponent; a surgeon that plans the procedure; a military unit with a battle plan. Wherever we see high level performance, we see evidence of extensive, detailed planning. The ideal mindset for the trader, like for the entrepreneur, is focused...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Agree Awaheed I have got to my level exactly because of that. Look at a link a few posts ago on that same subject. It is easier to have discipline when you see results and make good money. BruceIgnored