Disliked{quote} "Feibel is better at everything else" - no, he is not. Feibel is just a copycat, course seller. He sells free knowledge in an expensive packaging, labeled as "exclusive". You are better off sticking to the source: Master the Markets book, it is all there, it is from where Feibel copied everything, the rest he copied from Dr. Gary Dayton, blatantly. That is what those course/system sellers do, they just copy everything from someone else and give it a different name, change some parameters here and there, not much, and call it "THEIR method"...Ignored
- #33,462
- Sep 21, 2020 5:38am Sep 21, 2020 5:38am
{quote} Everyone learns differently - for me, MTM was very difficult because I couldn't see how everything fits together. The first lightbulbs started turning on after I went through Gary Dayton's videos. I made a big leap forward but still had some difficulties. I felt there were still significant missing pieces in my knowledge. Feibel's course handheld me from the beginning to the end, filing up the gaps in a structured manner. Now I feel like I'll get more value when I revisit Gary Dayton's videos.
Explain to me how Feibelīs course "filled gaps" in your knowledge if it is an inferior copy of Chart Reading Mastery?
I mean, he did not even try to hide that he copied everything... From the chart chapters structure (even names), content, down to the chart templates, he uses even the same words Dr. Gary uses... Havenīt you noticed how he never mentions the source of the knowledge, he just says Wyckoff, and that he develop the method over the years lol. He never talk about Dr. Gary, David Weis and VSA, rarely he comments about VSA and Tom Williams. He even calls the Weis Wave indicator "cumulative volume" or "wave volume", he is very careful to mention the name Weis. Do you know why? He does not want people googling those names and discovering from where he copied everything. The only thing different is the name of the course, and the fact that it is weaker. The worst of all is that he sells free knowledge in an expensive packaging and call it "exclusive", and "his method", "that he created LPA methodology" 
, I got scammed a couple of months ago by him.Here is the thread I made talking about the scam:
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...3#post13172533
- #33,463
- Sep 21, 2020 6:04am Sep 21, 2020 6:04am
{quote} Explain to me how Feibelīs course "filled gaps" in your knowledge if it is an inferior copy of Chart Reading Mastery?
Edit: I'm referring to his Logical Price Action course.
I just wanted to express my view after having read yours since I felt his course helped me. But I respect your opinion and will read your thread to find out the details.
- #33,472
- Sep 21, 2020 12:12pm Sep 21, 2020 12:12pm
- Joined Aug 2009 | Status: Reading the TAPE | 2,389 Posts
Without VSA, you're playing checkers while the Smart Money plays chess.
- #33,477
- Edited 3:59pm Sep 21, 2020 3:41pm | Edited 3:59pm
{quote} it does not matter if it dips or not, important (atleast imo) is the volume and the area where it does that pattern. cheers
I agree to disagree
The same way a spring needs to dip below support of anchor point and reverse, same applies to 2BR or key reversal, otherwise it is something else.
May I add that this is not a pattern, none of the VSA setups are patterns, at least I donīt see them as patterns (like chart patterns or candle patterns) Perhaps a pattern of behavior, but not a pattern like "oh look an ascending triangle" or "head and shoulders". A bit hard to explain what I mean.
