Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Can anyone convert the Blessing 3 v3.9.6.09 into MT5? 9 replies

Blessing EA by ananthhh 13 replies

Blessing Multipair EA 447 replies

'Blessing' EA Modification Wanted 3 replies

Forward testing results of my ea modified from Blessing 3.9.6 18 replies

Attachments: Most Famous Blessing 3.9.6 EA and Setfiles
Exit Attachments

Most Famous Blessing 3.9.6 EA and Setfiles

Quoting richard96816
Here's a GBPNZD m5 set file for Forex.com using history from: 2020.04.01 - 2020.06.06 As usual, this won't work for other brokers. {file} {image}
Hi Richard, thank for the GN on 5m.

yesterday, i use the EA that you posted some time ago, and run a test. The result not too bad, unfortunately, the test is not even 90%.
anyway, backtester 4hour time frame on USDJPY from 2009 to 2014. no particular reason.
It only feels that emotional investment/behaviors might change vis studying from the graph.

2013 0ct - dec is running uptrend, but EA did not capture, reason being, there still trades running on a certain margin.

How can we bring loss to a range of 600per trade, yet it won't affect much on the TP.

Let me know if this study is relevant. abit rusty after stopping for years.
Attached File(s)
File Type: pdf Strategy Tester_ b3rf2.1.5beta.pdf   95 KB | 207 downloads
Blessing 3 MT5 Project 10 Days from 06-10-2020.ex5

Appears to have ENUM problems. MT4 Blessing.15 defines enums for timeframes and other stuff. MT5 has more timeframes available. The new, MT5 ENUMs need to be used.

Where MT4 has these timeframes

Current, M1, M5, M15, M30, H1, H4, D1, W1 and MN1


MT5 has a number of in-between values

M2, M3, M4, M6, etc.


This means that some timeframes aren't available and/or that you end up with a different timeframe than you requested. Here's what happens in one case:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Blessing_MT5_Strategy_Tester_error.jpg Size: 147 KB

Probably the only safe setting for timeframe within parameters is Current, since it's the first item in both ENUMs and should refer to the same thing. The fix is to manually add the missing timeframes to the ENUM definition or to use the MT5 native one (ENUM_TIMEFRAMES). https://www.mql5.com/en/docs/constan...num_timeframes

Using the MT5 native ENUM definition will require more changes to the code.

Some of the other ENUMs do odd things in the parameter list. True and false change back and forth between the words and 0 and 1. While that may not effect performance it can be confusing.

Besides these somewhat minor issues the system appears to be working, at least in Strategy Tester.
Quoting richard96816
Blessing 3 MT5 Project 10 Days from 06-10-2020.ex5 Appears to have ENUM problems. MT4 Blessing.15 defines enums for timeframes and other stuff. MT5 has more timeframes available. The new, MT5 ENUMs need to be used. Where MT4 has these timeframes Current, M1, M5, M15, M30, H1, H4, D1, W1 and MN1 MT5 has a number of in-between values M2, M3, M4, M6, etc. This means that some timeframes aren't available and/or that you end up with a different timeframe than you requested. Here's what happens in one case: {image} Probably the only safe setting for timeframe...
Hi richard96816!
Thank you very much for your technical knowledge and for your help in this crucial part of the tests. Without your tests, I would never achieve anything alone, so Thanks!
I have already reported what appears to be the only problem so far and some more cosmetic improvements.
We will wait for version 2 of tests and I wait for you to do, please, one or two more backtestes.
Quoting richard96816
Here's a GBPNZD m5 set file for Forex.com using history from: 2020.04.01 - 2020.06.06 As usual, this won't work for other brokers. {file} {image}
Hy and thanks everybody ...
Is it possible have a set file for try optimitazion with mt5 as you produced for mt4?
I mean which is the best parameters to start to work in a mt5 version?
Thanks
Regards
Quoting cescof
{quote} Hy and thanks everybody ... Is it possible have a set file for try optimitazion with mt5 as you produced for mt4? I mean which is the best parameters to start to work in a mt5 version? Thanks Regards

why dont you try as well. it is a fresh version so everyone can do.
Hi,

I think the "Multiplier" is not working properly, because I set it 1 and the first position 0.01 lot but the second 0.02 and the next 0.03. Is is OK or not?
Quoting cdsaa
{quote} why dont you try as well. it is a fresh version so everyone can do.
of course ...
Thanks
Regards
Quoting Aaloy
{quote} Hi Richard, thank for the GN on 5m. yesterday, i use the EA that you posted some time ago, and run a test. The result not too bad, unfortunately, the test is not even 90%. anyway, backtester 4hour time frame on USDJPY from 2009 to 2014. no particular reason. It only feels that emotional investment/behaviors might change vis studying from the graph. 2013 0ct - dec is running uptrend, but EA did not capture, reason being, there still trades running on a certain margin. How can we bring loss to a range of 600per trade, yet it won't affect much...


Hi,

Could someone please tell me how to bring loss to a range of 600 per trade.


Thanks in advance.
Am not sure if others have the issue. Am getting insufficient balance. on MT5 back testing. Grid is not opening further trades. have given enough balance for 0.01 lot size 10000.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screen Shot 2020-06-12 at 7.43.45 AM.png Size: 296 KB
Quoting cdsaa
Am not sure if others have the issue. Am getting insufficient balance. on MT5 back testing. Grid is not opening further trades. have given enough balance for 0.01 lot size 10000. {image}

I am forward testing several configurations of the ENTRY PARAMETERS and have seen quite a few errors.
But I want to complete the 10 days forward testing then compile my error list.
Honesty is a very expensive gift. You wont find it in cheap people.WBuffett
Quoting euphorbia
Hi, I think the "Multiplier" is not working properly, because I set it 1 and the first position 0.01 lot but the second 0.02 and the next 0.03. Is is OK or not?
maximum is two decimal places and rounding.
Honesty is a very expensive gift. You wont find it in cheap people.WBuffett
When changing time frames or symbol it should delete pending orders
One instance I had a buy and a sell pending ordered, I assumed the set of stop order and limit order will be the same/
Hi everyone,

I am new to the MQL5 language and to EA in general, although I am quite experienced with python. The last few days I have been learning MQL4/5 and the languages do not look that hard to learn.

The EA looks amazing and quite promising.

I would like to contribute to the EA if possible, so if you need any help, please let me know.

Quoting cdsaa
Am not sure if others have the issue. Am getting insufficient balance. on MT5 back testing. Grid is not opening further trades. have given enough balance for 0.01 lot size 10000.

https://www.forexfactory.com/attachm...1&d=1591933458
I am getting the same message.

Thanks a lot for the great post, I 'll try to catch up!
The timeframe enum problem seems to be affecting many different things throughout MT5 Blessing.

It is possible to create good EAs very quickly. But things like grid layout don't seem to work reliably. I seem to mostly get one layer grids. So while profit factors are quite high ultimate profit isn't where it should be.

We definitely need to fix the timeframe issue before substantial testing can be done.

There are a number of other problems, but the timeframe issue is likely the problem with many of those too.
Quoting richard96816
The timeframe enum problem seems to be affecting many different things throughout MT5 Blessing. It is possible to create good EAs very quickly. But things like grid layout don't seem to work reliably. I seem to mostly get one layer grids. So while profit factors are quite high ultimate profit isn't where it should be. We definitely need to fix the timeframe issue before substantial testing can be done. There are a number of other problems, but the timeframe issue is likely the problem with many of those too.
Hi richard96816 and everyone who is helping with the MT5 version tests!!
I agree, so I have already reported this bug independently, so that the developer can work on it and resolve it, before we do more exhaustive tests! I can also say that I reported one more division by zero error that I caught, in one of my configurations. I also caught the insufficient balance error too. Let's see what the developer gets and keep you updated. Thank you for your help and don't forget to do tests on the MT4 version too, to improve both versions
Quoting Mcxtrader
{quote} Hi, Could someone please tell me how to bring loss to a range of 600 per trade. Thanks in advance.

Hi

just read your PM.

what do you mean "to bring loss to a range of 600 per trade"?

600 pips or $600.

If you mean 600 pips, you can set your SL to 600 pips but blessing will place your SL from you average entry price of all open positions.

you can also use the POSL = 600 pips and that will be your worst case SL in the event of power outage and you lose connection to your broker.
Honesty is a very expensive gift. You wont find it in cheap people.WBuffett
Quoting emmanuel7788
{quote} Hi just read your PM. what do you mean "to bring loss to a range of 600 per trade"? 600 pips or $600. If you mean 600 pips, you can set your SL to 600 pips but blessing will place your SL from you average entry price of all open positions. you can also use the POSL = 600 pips and that will be your worst case SL in the event of power outage and you lose connection to your broker.
Thanks for the update.

Could you please tell me how this highlighted is calculated.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 24 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 24 KB
Quoting Mcxtrader
{quote} Thanks for the update. Could you please tell me how this highlighted is calculated. {image} {image}
And also please let me know how to stop these three trade after 10$ loss.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 17 KB
Quoting richard96816
Here's the bug-fixed version addressing the divide by zero error reported recently. Sorry I didn't post it sooner, too much going on ... {file} This is not a high priority fix. It surfaced only rarely in my experience, and with minimal effects on performance. Be safe out there! https://tinyurl.com/CoronaSafe
Hello, i'm having trouble compiling. After i compiled the file, Blessing doesn't work. Can someone send me a compiled file? Thank you
Here you go.
Attached File(s)
File Type: txt Blessing_3_v3.9.6.15.ex4.txt   278 KB | 154 downloads
1 member viewing:
Petertao