Casino EA Trader | Page 344 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

$4 Trillion Gambling/Casino Everyday 1 reply

Doubling up method or playing casino 24 replies

casino journal 3 replies

Casino Forex 4 replies

Welcome To Casino ! 3 replies

Attachments: Casino EA Trader
Exit Attachments

Casino EA Trader

  • #6,861
  • Jun 7, 2020 1:32pm Jun 7, 2020 1:32pm
Quoting JustUncleL
{quote} These are good suggestions for a pip lock however, aren't you starting to get away from Basket trading design concept of the CT trader and more into individual pair trading. I would suggest a simple solution to scalp trading at lower time frames and that's just allow the individual TP/SL/TSL ATR values go below 0.1, and leave any pip lock mechanism for some future TS's like they were in the old S9 TS's. That way we don't overload the main CT bot with settings.
Hi JustUncleL

No im not getting away from the Basket Trading concept. I just want something that gives me better control over exits especially when i trade smaller TFs.
However your suggestion to have smaller increments for TP/SL/TSL ADR is really good.

Seller9 is it possible to give us 0,01 increments below 0,1? that will already make it much better .

regards

H
  • #6,862
  • Jun 7, 2020 1:35pm Jun 7, 2020 1:35pm
Quoting seller9
Here are some examples of trades that are signaling short trades at this time. This is where the new TS2 is at so far, getting closer to maybe having a working TS2. This is a combination of some past ideas put into a M15 TS2. More testing to do yet, will see how it goes this week. I will be posting some videos on this later today. {image} {image} {image} {image}

Hi Seller9

Ok now you are getting me excited. !!

The settings for the M15 scalper are fantastic. This will give us a lot of control over the exits.

Now you are talking my language !!

)

regards

H
  • #6,863
  • Edited 7:02pm Jun 7, 2020 6:22pm | Edited 7:02pm
Quoting HMuller1971
{quote} Hi JustUncleL No im not getting away from the Basket Trading concept. I just want something that gives me better control over exits especially when i trade smaller TFs. However your suggestion to have smaller increments for TP/SL/TSL ADR is really good. Seller9 is it possible to give us 0,01 increments below 0,1? that will already make it much better . regards H
How about this in version 7 when it comes out?

Attached Image
  • #6,864
  • Jun 7, 2020 11:54pm Jun 7, 2020 11:54pm
Quoting HMuller1971
{quote} Hi Seller9 Ok now you are getting me excited. !! The settings for the M15 scalper are fantastic. This will give us a lot of control over the exits. Now you are talking my language !! ) regards H
Yeah that's what I meant about keeping the specialized pip lock control and parameters in the TS2 exits, thanks again to Eugene what a great implementation idea there.
  • #6,865
  • Jun 8, 2020 1:31am Jun 8, 2020 1:31am
Quoting seller9
{quote} How about this in version 7 when it comes out? {image}
Thank you very much, that would be great. If it's not adding too much maybe the default values TP and SL ADR in the CT parameters so they can be set to a preferred startup size.
  • #6,866
  • Edited 6:16am Jun 8, 2020 1:36am | Edited 6:16am
Quoting seller9
{quote} How about this in version 7 when it comes out? {image}

Hi Seller9

ok so yes in general this is what we need, but,.. i have an issue.

In all my setups i always use low values for TP and SL. (0,2 or 0,3) and I always have 6 to 8 setups on my machine running consecutively every day.

This means that when i set these things up i I will have to click that "less than" arrow (<) next to the TP and SL inputs more than thousand times to complete all my setups. This will just kill me. !!!!

is there a way that in the DB settings you can give us a global input that controls what value the TP and SL will start with?
...for instance if the global setting is at 0,2 then when i activate the TP and SL they will start off at 0,2 and then I can fine tune from there onward with the finer increments you will implement.


thank you in advance..

H
  • #6,867
  • Edited 6:31am Jun 8, 2020 5:30am | Edited 6:31am
HI Seller9

I want to use the CCI filter in combination with the RSi

But i believe the CCI is not functioning correctly.

See my settings for CCI in snapshot 2

and the resulting signals in snapshot 1. IN snapshot 1 i show the H4 TF for EURGBP that is signalling long according to the CCI, however if you look at the CCI indicator (which is set exactly as in the DB settings, it shows that its close to the -90 level and should not signal long at all.)

Its as if the DB is ignoring the 240 TF I set and its using the 1H TF of the DB .

please investigate and let me know.

thank you.

PS. I just tested the CCI with Upper level = 10 and Lower Level -10 and no signals. so something is definitely wrong..

H
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot2.png Size: 190 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 412 KB
  • #6,868
  • Edited 6:35am Jun 8, 2020 6:01am | Edited 6:35am
Hi Seller9

I know i have seen this in one of your videos way back when and i also made a note of this and saved it among the thousands of files i have created over the last 7 months. But i cannot find that damn file and I have forgotten:

Your Indicators (e.g. CCI) are based on the following variations of price:
is this the right order below:??


1) Open — based on open prices.
2) High — based on High prices.
3) Low — based on Low prices.
4) Close — based on close prices.
5) Median Price (HL/2) — based on the median price: (High + Low)/2.
6) Typical Price (HLC/3) — based on the typical price: (High + Low + Close)/3.
7) Weighted Close (HLCC/4) — based on the average weighted close price: (High + Low + 2*Close)/4.



so,... for example,. for the CCI settings in the DB is nr5 above the same as Apply_To = 5 in your setting?

Please correct the order above if it is wrong..

Thank you..

regards

H
  • #6,869
  • Jun 8, 2020 7:42am Jun 8, 2020 7:42am
Quoting HMuller1971
Hi Seller9 I know i have seen this in one of your videos way back when and i also made a note of this and saved it among the thousands of files i have created over the last 7 months. But i cannot find that damn file and I have forgotten: Your Indicators (e.g. CCI) are based on the following variations of price: is this the right order below:?? 1) Open — based on open prices. 2) High — based on High prices. 3) Low — based on Low prices. 4) Close — based on close prices. 5) Median Price (HL/2) — based on the median price: (High + Low)/2. 6) Typical...
From my understanding the numbering for prices in indicators start at zero and is (just look at a moving average indicator):

0 = Close
1 = Open
2 = High
3 = Low
4 = Median (HL/2)
5 = Typical Price (HLC/3)
6 = Weighted Price (HLCC/4)
  • #6,870
  • Jun 8, 2020 7:55am Jun 8, 2020 7:55am
Quoting HMuller1971
HI Seller9 I want to use the CCI filter in combination with the RSi But i believe the CCI is not functioning correctly. See my settings for CCI in snapshot 2 and the resulting signals in snapshot 1. IN snapshot 1 i show the H4 TF for EURGBP that is signalling long according to the CCI, however if you look at the CCI indicator (which is set exactly as in the DB settings, it shows that its close to the -90 level and should not signal long at all.) Its as if the DB is ignoring the 240 TF I set and its using the 1H TF of the DB . please investigate...
The CCI signal looks correct to me, from my understanding with CT you get a long signal from a confirmed cross upwards over the -90 limit, which is what has occurred in your example. Seller9 can correct me if I'm wrong.
  • #6,871
  • Jun 8, 2020 8:12am Jun 8, 2020 8:12am
Quoting JustUncleL
{quote} The CCI signal looks correct to me, from my understanding with CT you get a long signal from a confirmed cross upwards over the -90 limit, which is what has occurred in your example. Seller9 can correct me if I'm wrong.
Correct, the previous 2 closed candles form the cross.
  • #6,872
  • Edited 12:06pm Jun 8, 2020 9:36am | Edited 12:06pm
Quoting seller9
{quote} Correct, the previous 2 closed candles form the cross.

Hi Seller9

Ok I guess this is a bit confusing because according to the Investopedia website the CCI is used as follows:

"A basic CCI strategy is used to track the CCI for movement above +100, which generates buy signals, and movements below -100, which generates sell or short trade signals."

https://www.investopedia.com/article...ccurs%20again.

So the CCI in your DB is implemented differently from what i expected.

OK so it seems the signal your CCI implementation generates is only when the cross takes place, it does not signal when above or below the high or low level?is this correct?? if so, can you please implement a setting in the CCI where it keeps generating the signals above or below the high and low levels. I want to use it like a directional filter exactly as is published by Investopedia.

let me know please..as i am trying to test a setup that was published and for this i need the CCI to keep signalling above or below the set levels.

regards

H
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 36 KB
  • #6,873
  • Jun 8, 2020 9:53am Jun 8, 2020 9:53am
Quoting JustUncleL
{quote} From my understanding the numbering for prices in indicators start at zero and is (just look at a moving average indicator): 0 = Close 1 = Open 2 = High 3 = Low 4 = Median (HL/2) 5 = Typical Price (HLC/3) 6 = Weighted Price (HLCC/4)
Hi JustUncleL

Thanks for the feedback.
Ok that tip about looking at a Moving Average indicator is great, I will remember that.


regards

H
  • #6,874
  • Jun 8, 2020 12:12pm Jun 8, 2020 12:12pm
Regarding CCI,...

OK so, I now have seen various interpretations of CCI and the way Seller9 has it implemented is one of them.
See snapshot below. So im on track again.

Sorry if I created confusion. !!!!

I do however want to ask Seller9 for functionality in the CT DB that will enable us to choose between 1) a cross over signal or 2) a above or below level signal.
The current implementation in the CT DB seems only to generate crossover signals which are very rare.

I am basically looking to test CCI as a directional filter (in combination with RSI) as it generates directional signals that are quite different from RSI and HAS and other directional indicators. Hope this makes sense...

thank you in advance

regards

H
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 304 KB
  • #6,875
  • Jun 8, 2020 1:10pm Jun 8, 2020 1:10pm
Quoting HMuller1971
Regarding CCI,... OK so, I now have seen various interpretations of CCI and the way Seller9 has it implemented is one of them. See snapshot below. So im on track again. Sorry if I created confusion. !!!! I do however want to ask Seller9 for functionality in the CT DB that will enable us to choose between 1) a cross over signal or 2) a above or below level signal. The current implementation in the CT DB seems only to generate crossover signals which are very rare. I am basically looking to test CCI as a directional filter (in combination with RSI)...
This is how Forex Traders mostly use it so it is set up that way.

https://www.dailyfx.com/forex/educat...0and%20%2B100.
  • #6,876
  • Jun 8, 2020 1:43pm Jun 8, 2020 1:43pm
Here are some trades from my Monday Tests, looks like a short trade day. I was just testing the add to trade so didn't have any SL settings, will test those tonight.

I ended up with 51 total trades for a profit of $1254.27 just letting it run without any exits and just shut it down this morning.

Maximum adds is 3.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_1.gif Size: 33 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_2.gif Size: 32 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_3.gif Size: 35 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_4.gif Size: 32 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_5.gif Size: 32 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Example_6.gif Size: 35 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Exaple_7.gif Size: 37 KB
  • #6,877
  • Jun 8, 2020 3:07pm Jun 8, 2020 3:07pm
My results for the day.

Just treading water.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 462 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot2.png Size: 458 KB
  • #6,878
  • Jun 9, 2020 7:03am Jun 9, 2020 7:03am
Crunch time for @HM RSIe entries, all my setups went into red Monday and now are even further into the red, I will keep them all running to see how they behave. Here's a couple of typical

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2020-06-09 21_47_52-EURTRYi,H1.png Size: 181 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2020-06-09 21_47_41-USDTRY,H1.png Size: 187 KB


However, my TrendRider(240) hit target (both continued from last week):
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2020-06-09 21_56_30-USDTRY-e,H4.png Size: 177 KB

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2020-06-09 21_56_42-USDTRY,H1.png Size: 177 KB


and WaveRider(60) continue from Monday:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 2020-06-09 21_56_56-EURTRY,H4.png Size: 178 KB
  • #6,879
  • Edited 8:18am Jun 9, 2020 7:26am | Edited 8:18am
Yes, my setups are going through a tough time.

I started to investigate and saw that the HAS240 filter is causing the issue. The HAS240 is very slow to adjust to changes in trend. It was still signalling longs (for many FX pairs) while on the 1H HAS we already had a very steady downward trend.

The HAS240 (which was signalling longs) caused the RSIs to trade upwards pull backs into 1H down trend. So I immediately started to also trade same setup with with HAS 1H and results are very good.

So now i need to test both kinds of setups but from what i can see is the Dual Timeframe thing is not very good when markets starts turning. HAS 240 is too slow to adjust to trend changes and you therefore get slapped very hard. So maybe better to have all indicators on 1H timeframe.

First snapshot shows my typical setup and other show my new setups all indicators at 1H TF

H
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 449 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot2.png Size: 454 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot3.png Size: 458 KB
  • #6,880
  • Jun 9, 2020 8:36am Jun 9, 2020 8:36am
Quoting HMuller1971
Yes, my setups are going through a tough time. I started to investigate and saw that the HAS240 filter is causing the issue. The HAS240 is very slow to adjust to changes in trend. It was still signalling longs (for many FX pairs) while on the 1H HAS we already had a very steady downward trend. The HAS240 (which was signalling longs) caused the RSIs to trade upwards pull backs into 1H down trend. So I immediately started to also trade same setup with with HAS 1H and results are very good. So now i need to test both kinds of setups but from what i...
This is one of the main issues with long term trend trading, the trends turn slowly, even sometime turn back again and everything goes way out of kilter. Having a shorter time frame we tend to pick up chop a lot more. Ahh the joys of trend trading ... I think the answer might be take the profits when you can and keep losses down with a Basket SL and aim for two weeks in three with target hit. So if I was keeping to weekly targets for Basket TP and SL, then I would have stopped all my RSIe setups already and restart again next week.
24 traders viewing now