2
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- #60,743
- Edited 10:18am Feb 5, 2020 9:24am | Edited 10:18am
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
- #60,745
- Feb 5, 2020 9:39pm Feb 5, 2020 9:39pm
A very careful study of the basis for the Doctrine of Eschatology and the Chronology of Biblical Literature demonstrates for itself the fallacy of the core offering presented inside the New Testament - namely - the Second Coming of someone who never existed. The following proves that fact:
Luke 21 29:33
Matthew 24 3
Matthew 24 33:34
We have a problem here. Jesus was talking directly to his disciples. Moreover, he was talking to his disciples during his timeline, not ours. He told people standing directly round him and living in his timeline that some of them would not die.
If that is true (and it is), then the great tribulation, rapture and second coming had to have already happened. Or, Jesus was a lunatic and/or a massively misunderstood mythical figure without genuine historical presence.
Here's the final nail in the coffin of the New Testament:
This was John the Baptist being referred to here and Jesus thought and taught that John the Baptist was in fact, Elijah. Interesting enough as a side note, Islam teaches that Elijah the Prophet was in fact, Elijah Muhammad - one and the same fictional character. An alleged Major Prophet. To nail this down with certainty, turn to the book of Malachi. This Biblical Chronology becomes super important to flushing out the cruel Con having been played on Humanity for over 2,000+ years. Here it comes - prepare yourself:
Malachi 4 5
At this point in Biblical Chronology, according to Malachi, God was supposed to send Elijah before the coming of the "great and dreadful day of the Lord." Yet, Elijah, was already dead more than 700+ years at this stage. He was flat out dead. However, we know that Jesus thought and taught that John the Baptist was in fact, Elijah. The proof for that comes in Matthew once again:
Matthew 17 9:13
It was made crystal clear what Jesus thought and taught to his disciples. Jesus, confirms for his disciples that Elijah through John the Baptist had already come in Jesus' lifetime, not a future event to take place in our lifetime some 2,000+ years after he said it. This confirms Jesus' claims to his disciples of being the Son of Man and that it would be he who would be crucified, raised from the dead and return again in the clouds for everyone alive during his timeline ("...you will not taste death") to see him coming in those glorious clouds. So, was Malachi completely mistaken.
Even the writers of the New Testament (essentially boils down to Josephus and the Flavians in Rome crafting the matter themselves) knew that they were stretching credulity to the absolute limits of reasonableness. Here is the proof for that:
Matthew 11 11:15
"If you are willing to receive it" and "for those with the ears to hear" are dead giveaways that those who wrote this stuff knew very well they were stretching for a big ask. They were countering a major claim made in the bible that Elijah, not John the Baptist was to be the keystone forerunner and the one to prepare the way for the Son of Man and his first coming. Yet, here they were asking you to "receive" a new "truth" that altered an old "truth."
Yet, the same bible tells that not one word of itself should ever be changed. Behold, they changed it right before our very eyes. "Accept" John the Baptist instead of Elijah, because Elijah is darn near 700+ years past dead and there is no way in the world that we can revive him and bring him back. So, take John here as "prophecy fulfilled" as the sign that the "End is Here" instead. Unreal.
But, it gets even worse for the bible:
Mark 9 1
This was Jesus talking to people in his timeline, his lifetime in his physical presence - not our timeline 2,000+ years into his future. He's expressly promising them that they will not die until he came back a second time with all power and glory.
Mark 13 32
More mind games. The psychological conditioning here is especially rude. Keeping people hanging on the edge of their chair (a cliff hanger - who is good at producing those is another thread entire) for their entire lifetime - always dying in the end but never seeing the Son of Man returning in the clouds is simple cruel on its face. Yet, that is precisely what Mark 13 32 was designed to accomplish.
Of course, here is the ultimate self inflicting wound of the New Testament:
Matthew 10 21:23
"...before the Son of Man comes." The were not even supposed to have taken the "Good News" throughout the city of Israel, before The Second Coming. Clear contradiction. Houston, we have a serious problem.
I've lost a lot of family members over the decades. Most of them died believing that which was clearly a Con. I resent the spread of that Con in any form anywhere upon the face of the earth that my Ancestors walked in full Human form for hundreds of thousands of years before anyone did. My Ancient Ancestor's descendants have been plagued with this Con for in excess of 2,000 years right up through today. I am extremely saddened by that fact. I see it as my duty to awaken every single one of them to the Con of Man that has so destabilized their lives on this planet for so many years.
So shall it be written. So shall it be done.
Luke 21 29:33
Matthew 24 3
Matthew 24 33:34
We have a problem here. Jesus was talking directly to his disciples. Moreover, he was talking to his disciples during his timeline, not ours. He told people standing directly round him and living in his timeline that some of them would not die.
If that is true (and it is), then the great tribulation, rapture and second coming had to have already happened. Or, Jesus was a lunatic and/or a massively misunderstood mythical figure without genuine historical presence.
Here's the final nail in the coffin of the New Testament:
This was John the Baptist being referred to here and Jesus thought and taught that John the Baptist was in fact, Elijah. Interesting enough as a side note, Islam teaches that Elijah the Prophet was in fact, Elijah Muhammad - one and the same fictional character. An alleged Major Prophet. To nail this down with certainty, turn to the book of Malachi. This Biblical Chronology becomes super important to flushing out the cruel Con having been played on Humanity for over 2,000+ years. Here it comes - prepare yourself:
Malachi 4 5
At this point in Biblical Chronology, according to Malachi, God was supposed to send Elijah before the coming of the "great and dreadful day of the Lord." Yet, Elijah, was already dead more than 700+ years at this stage. He was flat out dead. However, we know that Jesus thought and taught that John the Baptist was in fact, Elijah. The proof for that comes in Matthew once again:
Matthew 17 9:13
It was made crystal clear what Jesus thought and taught to his disciples. Jesus, confirms for his disciples that Elijah through John the Baptist had already come in Jesus' lifetime, not a future event to take place in our lifetime some 2,000+ years after he said it. This confirms Jesus' claims to his disciples of being the Son of Man and that it would be he who would be crucified, raised from the dead and return again in the clouds for everyone alive during his timeline ("...you will not taste death") to see him coming in those glorious clouds. So, was Malachi completely mistaken.
Even the writers of the New Testament (essentially boils down to Josephus and the Flavians in Rome crafting the matter themselves) knew that they were stretching credulity to the absolute limits of reasonableness. Here is the proof for that:
Matthew 11 11:15
"If you are willing to receive it" and "for those with the ears to hear" are dead giveaways that those who wrote this stuff knew very well they were stretching for a big ask. They were countering a major claim made in the bible that Elijah, not John the Baptist was to be the keystone forerunner and the one to prepare the way for the Son of Man and his first coming. Yet, here they were asking you to "receive" a new "truth" that altered an old "truth."
Yet, the same bible tells that not one word of itself should ever be changed. Behold, they changed it right before our very eyes. "Accept" John the Baptist instead of Elijah, because Elijah is darn near 700+ years past dead and there is no way in the world that we can revive him and bring him back. So, take John here as "prophecy fulfilled" as the sign that the "End is Here" instead. Unreal.
But, it gets even worse for the bible:
Mark 9 1
This was Jesus talking to people in his timeline, his lifetime in his physical presence - not our timeline 2,000+ years into his future. He's expressly promising them that they will not die until he came back a second time with all power and glory.
Mark 13 32
More mind games. The psychological conditioning here is especially rude. Keeping people hanging on the edge of their chair (a cliff hanger - who is good at producing those is another thread entire) for their entire lifetime - always dying in the end but never seeing the Son of Man returning in the clouds is simple cruel on its face. Yet, that is precisely what Mark 13 32 was designed to accomplish.
Of course, here is the ultimate self inflicting wound of the New Testament:
Matthew 10 21:23
"...before the Son of Man comes." The were not even supposed to have taken the "Good News" throughout the city of Israel, before The Second Coming. Clear contradiction. Houston, we have a serious problem.
I've lost a lot of family members over the decades. Most of them died believing that which was clearly a Con. I resent the spread of that Con in any form anywhere upon the face of the earth that my Ancestors walked in full Human form for hundreds of thousands of years before anyone did. My Ancient Ancestor's descendants have been plagued with this Con for in excess of 2,000 years right up through today. I am extremely saddened by that fact. I see it as my duty to awaken every single one of them to the Con of Man that has so destabilized their lives on this planet for so many years.
So shall it be written. So shall it be done.
- #60,746
- Edited 4:12am Feb 6, 2020 3:46am | Edited 4:12am
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
A very careful study of the basis for the Doctrine of Eschatology and the Chronology of Biblical Literature demonstrates for itself the fallacy of the core offering presented inside the New Testament - namely - the Second Coming of someone who never existed. The following proves that fact: Luke 21 29:33 {image} Matthew 24 3 {image} Matthew 24 33:34 {image} We have a problem here. Jesus was talking directly to his disciples. Moreover, he was talking to his disciples during his timeline, not ours. He told people standing directly round him and living...
You are not a trader. Not a word heard from you before, nothing about trading. NOTHING.
suddenly you wan't to discuss JESUS.
What does Matthew 24:27 said?
Nothing you presented
TO DISCUSS JESUS, GOTO JESUS FORUM.
But if my friends want discuss God or Jesus, even indian scriptures, i don't mind.
FOr LERKING DEVILS AND GHOST AND STRANGERS.
I SAY GO TO YOUR OWN COMMUNITY.
REGARDS
TO MAKE STATEMENTS. START YOUR OWN THREAD FIND PEEPS WHO WANTS TO LISTEN. OK?
BY THE WAY, I AM NOT THE POPE.
What a funny world.
When the bible was compiled i wasn't there.
So i no comments.
I study. If i understand, that fine. If i don't, thats fine. If i lose trade, thats not fine.
Inserted Video
- #60,748
- Edited 4:59am Feb 6, 2020 4:20am | Edited 4:59am
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
- #60,750
- Edited 4:01pm Feb 6, 2020 6:14am | Edited 4:01pm
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
- #60,755
- Edited 9:19pm Feb 6, 2020 9:04pm | Edited 9:19pm
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
{quote} What you are talking about has nothing to do with Christian eschatology, and has nothing at all with what you call biblical chronology as well. You claim that Jesus did not exist. I will refer you to a few historical sources that are beyond the Christian horizon. The first is the Jewish historian Flavius Joephus, twenty years later we have the testimonies of Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, there are also works by Lucian of Samosata, Celsus the Platonic philosopher and letter written by Mara bar Serapion to his son. Interestingly, the...
Thank you 7thtorch for educating.
What jettrader said.
The jews will stone him.
The christians will stone him.
The romans will stone him.
The muslims will stone him.
We cannot stone him.
May the sinless one please cast the first stone?
Ooops no stones in forum. Only throw words at him. Hahahaha
Uneducated minds lives painful life.
Uneducated hearts,?????
I pray jettrader never gets into bad trade position.
Could be fatal for him.
Major mindset problem. Too clever and i not believe he is magician, although he made disappearing act after vomit came out of his mouth on his opening introduction.
Maybe his jet grounded. Coronavirus.
- #60,757
- Feb 6, 2020 10:30pm Feb 6, 2020 10:30pm
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
{quote} evening maestro...hope that you are doing good.... well..if he wants a "real deal talk" about the issue of existence and non-existence...here we are with no fear about any conclusion...
Yes no problem to discuss. Just need keep things in friendly educational way. The subject of God can flare up peeps different perspectives. So long as is friendly, all matter we friends can discuss infect each others minds. No problem. As long as no spitting at each others face pass all sorts phlem is ok. Otherwise can get forum quarantined. Hahahsha
May God spread kindness amongst men.
And may men spread kindness to all. God bless.
Regards
- #60,758
- Feb 7, 2020 2:56am Feb 7, 2020 2:56am
- Joined Nov 2010 | Status: The bucking bronco and I. | 11,029 Posts
Nonono. You chaps been fpllowing me long enough. Have you ever seen me catch falling knifes? Never. I leave the smart and rich activities to smart kids and rich bums. After when they bleeding and bellying up from their adventures, then i will come tie em up like crabs and cook em. Now we we already square, so just watch the hero theateric. Let em have their fun first. Play hero. I not theego shouting kind. Better be live trader than dead hero. Regards
- #60,759
- Feb 7, 2020 4:12am Feb 7, 2020 4:12am
- Joined Nov 2007 | Status: Trader | 19,782 Posts
{quote}
- #60,760
- Edited 4:50am Feb 7, 2020 4:36am | Edited 4:50am
- Joined Nov 2010 | Status: The bucking bronco and I. | 11,029 Posts
{quote}
Thanks for the smile you gave me! Nice reminder about the correct mindset.