|
Joined Dec 2018
|
Status: Junior Member
|4 Posts
In resume, you mean that if i make a Backtest with 99,90% modelling real tick data quality and enable variable spread, then when i use it in real account (with VPS server), that results will not be the same? I have a scalp EA with incredibles results..thanks for your reply
|
Commercial Member
|
Joined Feb 2014
|9,902 Posts
"In resume, you mean that if i make a Backtest with 99,90% modelling real tick data quality and enable variable spread, then when i use it in real account (with VPS server), that results will not be the same? I have a scalp EA with incredibles results..thanks for your reply "
If you test on tick data (assuming good quality data); with correct GMT, zone, variable spread, slippage, commissions etc. and the tools / indi your EA uses have no errors, then the output should be CLOSE to reality.
Dear friends, I have developed an EA which works based on Keltner Channels Break out. I am sharing that Robot here.
Down load the Indicator (Keltner_Channels.ex4) and copy it to Indicators folder of the MT4 and download the Expert Advisor(KeltnerEA_Ver2.ex4) file and copy it to Experts folder of MT4.
I request you to share your backtest or Forward test results in here.
Hello there, I am new here and was looking for an answer to a question. I am testing different indicators using EAs made in Fxdreema, that are based on the No Nonsense Forex rules (I am sure most of you know about it). My question would be, do I really need to use the every tick model when backtesting? The EA only opens/closes a position at the begging of the 1D candle.
Hello,
may I ask someone to test the EA attched below, with 99.9 percent modelling quality, on EURGBP, M15, for as long period as possible?
Thank you very much, cheers