Casino EA Trader

Quoting justunclel

Disliked

{quote} you can basically do this with basket_trader_v9 : Perhaps try this setup has(1,50,1,1)+has2(1,200,1,1)+swg(3,1,12) {image}

Ignored

Quoting Magregus

Disliked

Here is my first test with Cycle V5, Settings are Cycle 1,2,1 Addon of 9/0.7 with RSI 240/1 - Two basket's closed so far {image}

Ignored

Quoting sosofab

Disliked

{quote} Hi Magregus, what timeframe is your charts? Thanks

Ignored

Quoting fairtraderuk

Disliked

Here are some results from Cycle Trader v5 using H4 and H1 setups with varying Cycle Entry and Signal Candles from yesterday and today. Again not all setups triggered trades. Also forgot to set RSI 1440/4/1 on the H4 setup which seems to demonstrates the benefit of RSI filter. {image} {image} {image} {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting seller9

Disliked

Version 5 of the S9 Cycle Trader TS should be out by the end of the week if all goes well. I started testing it this afternoon as shown by the screen shots below. The only difference between version 5 and version 4 is the addition of the MA buy sell line. So far it is doing what it is suppose to do. The 2nd red dip was the day change over when spreads go crazy. {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting JustUncleL

Disliked

{quote} I would not recommend using Cycle(1,0) nor Cycle(1,1), things get out of hand very quickly, in todays case due to one pair GBPNZD, this also demonstrates the need for a reasonable SL to prevent these blowouts on a real account. {image} {image} Whereas when I used Cycle(2,1), it did not even touch the GBP pairs and was more controlled: {image}

Ignored

Quoting lananpips

Disliked

{quote} Hi Gene, what happened to the option where we can choose a different ball as exit and we can add as price move in the correct direction? This trade right here can benefit from that. With the current setting, trade was kicked out too early. Just checking. {image}

Ignored

Quoting seller9

Disliked

{quote} Version 4 never had that and version 5 just added the MA.

Ignored

Quoting fairtraderuk

Disliked

{quote} Yes of course I would not trade those but thought would be decent comparisons with a few tests running in parallel. Meantime just to compare the Cycle 2/1 from today this is what I have with EURUSD picked up in the wrong direction and now trying to recover perhaps. Surprised re the differences in results on this setup; perhaps you could confirm if settings are the same per image. Looks like the same syndrome as GBPUSD on the Cycle 1/1 setup(?) Thanks a lot PS I'm coming across the MA crossover with 9 Add To Trades in undesirable direction...

Ignored

Quoting JustUncleL

Disliked

{quote} Yes the settings are the same but may have been a different Broker, mine is Oanda for that setup. Yes I agree that perhaps an extra safeguard exit of price closing the opposite side of MA may help, it would of in this case anyway. I think 3 or 4 Ball with one or two Signal_Candle's is going to be the safest, my (3,1) setup has not even had a hit for Monday and Tuesday, of coarse there are no guarantees with Marty that there will be no blow out with any setup so I expect a Basket SL will need to be the safeguard.

Ignored

Quoting fairtraderuk

Disliked

{quote} Thanks for the feedback JustUncleL.I have also had no 3/0 or 3/1 trades with MA 200 since Thursday. Seems at one end of the scale we can get huge DD and the other no trades pending cycle options but all seems great whilst we are on the right side of the trend. Dear Gene, in view of our discussion here would be good to know if there could be any technical safeguards incorporated in Cycle Trader to avoid trade continuation on MA crossover (candle close other side) perhaps through TS config options. Any other thoughts or suggestions would be...

Ignored

Quoting JustUncleL

Disliked

{quote} The market has changed from previous weeks where the 200ma was producing good results, this happens all the time just as we think we have a good setup the market changes and the setup is not consistent now. Many of my other setups are also not signalling or not giving good results like before. So I believe we basically have to ride out the storm. For example my CycleV5(2,1)+200ema finally came through and hit target today: {image} BTW: I'm still getting -1 crap errors on some of my Pepperstone Demo accounts, which prevented some layers from...

Ignored

Quoting fairtraderuk

Disliked

{quote} Thanks yes makes sense and it is frustrating as it seems we are for ever taking two steps forward and one step back in test mode. I am now changing tact and running all the setups 24 x 5 with EL 75/40 with a view to gearing down to 0.01 lot trading for any live trading. Also agree with you on the most sensible setup potentially being Cycle 3,1 backed by MA200 in hope of missing most spikes. Whilst this setup does not seem to trigger too often, it does seem to manage the best EQ/DD ratio when it eventually kicks off. As for -1 errors I have...

Ignored