This is not an IQ test. If you want to help people then show them. I know the answer will be "It's for our own good. We shouldn't be so lazy". However, there is zero evidence your approach works. In fact, considering the poor adoption rate it's obvious it doesn't. Have you read @George's recent posts -- OMG -- zero content. It's the same chastising posts hundreds of times. I think he thinks if he repeats it enough times then it must be true. Or, maybe, there is nothing more for him to say -- so, he continues with the condescending comments.
ALL WE SEE IS LAZINESS AND IGNORANTS ON A HIGH PERCENTAGE LEVEL ! ! ! !
ALL ONE NEEDS TO MENTION IS
AN INDICATOR ,,, OR AN EA AVAILABLE ,,,
YOU WILL ROUND UP 90% OF MEMBERS ! ! ! !
AND THEY WONDER WHY ,,
THEY ARE NOT SUCCEEDING IN THIS BUSINESS ! ! !
THE BLIND LEADS THE BLIND ! ! !
You've mentioned that for 10 years you studied and spent lots of screen time -- and where did it get you? 10 years of struggling. And now you insist we should all do the same. But I know you don't see that.
People learn quicker when you show them exactly what you mean. When I learned calculus the instructor didn't pose questions on the board. He worked through examples from beginning to end. I don't want to have to spend time figuring out what you mean -- why do you find it so hard to make things easy for us?
In my mind when I think of Andy there is Andy the person and @moodybot the forex trader. Andy the person is one of the finest I've ever met (though we've never met). @moodybot the forex trader is an excellent trader who wants to help people but has failed in that regard and can't contemplate a different approach. My opinion of Andy the person has never wavered. However, I'm no longer interested in @George's methodology. There is only so many times I can be called lazy and blind before it eventually sinks in that this is not the type of person I wish to learn from. You could offer it to me on a silver platter and I would pass. Andy -- I like you and hope you can still offer guidance and pointers along the way -- but let's keep @George's stuff in @George's thread.
4