My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe | Page 43 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Broker Challenge "NDD/STP" vs. True "ECN" and "Mkt Mkr" broker talk 46 replies

Dealing with "Invalid Price", "Requote", "Server Busy" in MT4 3 replies

Timeframe inside current timeframe - is that possible? 2 replies

Seeing higher timeframe indicators on lower timeframe 4 replies

Finding the best "personal" timeframe! 6 replies

Attachments: My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe
Exit Attachments

My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe

  • #841
  • Mar 3, 2019 3:02am Mar 3, 2019 3:02am
Quoting Feex
Try testing ULTRON_LITE_3 with these settings: TrailingStop = 30 TrailingStep = 2 and TrailingStop = 23 TrailingStep = 2
Incredible thanks for sharing! For me the best results come from trailing 23/2 but my data is not so good. Best open hour for me is 7, best close 23 - optimizing over 6 months.
  • #842
  • Mar 3, 2019 5:43am Mar 3, 2019 5:43am
Quoting cdsaa
{image} This Tick Data Suite - with Variable Spread and Commission. Good result for the period. I will post optimisation results for those who need it. IT is dependent on trailing. {file}
hi, cdsaa,..or any one with tickdata 99.9%,....its possible to runn this settings with your tickdata,..i dont have 99.9% tickdata.

SL,...116

trailing stop,...41

trailing step,...23

thx
  • #843
  • Mar 3, 2019 5:53am Mar 3, 2019 5:53am
Quoting artic118
{quote} hi, cdsaa,..or any one with tickdata 99.9%,....its possible to runn this settings with your tickdata,..i dont have 99.9% tickdata. SL,...116 trailing stop,...41 trailing step,...23 thx
Am testing now with 30 and 2 from 01-march 2016 to 2019 - It is taking slow time.

After that will do 23 and 2.

I will do your 41 and 23. SL- 116.
  • #844
  • Mar 3, 2019 5:59am Mar 3, 2019 5:59am
Quoting cdsaa
{quote} Am testing now with 30 and 2 from 01-march 2016 to 2019 - It is taking slow time. After that will do 23 and 2. I will do your 41 and 23. SL- 116.
thank you,.i wait,..
  • #845
  • Mar 3, 2019 6:05am Mar 3, 2019 6:05am
With testing I recommend you use good quality data from dukascopy available from tickstory or similar. Also you can use the optimiser in backtester for parameter ranges, it's a bit easier.

Good luck with it.

Regards Paul
  • #846
  • Edited Mar 4, 2019 12:34am Mar 3, 2019 10:14pm | Edited Mar 4, 2019 12:34am
Quoting cdsaa
{quote} Am testing now with 30 and 2 from 01-march 2016 to 2019 - It is taking slow time. After that will do 23 and 2. I will do your 41 and 23. SL- 116.


Trailing Stop- 41, Step- 23 and SL- 116

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot2.png Size: 198 KB


Trailing Stop-30 Step-2 and Other Settings default.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot3.png Size: 200 KB


Trailing Stop -23 and step -2
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 199 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: zip 30_2.zip   28 KB | 501 downloads
File Type: zip 4123_116.zip   17 KB | 477 downloads
File Type: zip 23_2.zip   28 KB | 456 downloads
  • #847
  • Mar 3, 2019 10:25pm Mar 3, 2019 10:25pm
Awesome Thread and brilliant minds at work here. EA's fascinate me, but looking at some of these back tests, I do have to ask (those that have been there, done that)...

When you go down to changing SL and TP by just a couple pips here an there, is that not curve fitting? I mean with enough adjustments, you are bound to get to that magic mix of Tral, Step, and SL, but that won't mean nearly as much, right?

Just wondering. Subscribed and look forward to seeing this develop!
  • #848
  • Mar 3, 2019 10:35pm Mar 3, 2019 10:35pm
Quoting tradeChaser
Awesome Thread and brilliant minds at work here. EA's fascinate me, but looking at some of these back tests, I do have to ask (those that have been there, done that)... When you go down to changing SL and TP by just a couple pips here an there, is that not curve fitting? I mean with enough adjustments, you are bound to get to that magic mix of Tral, Step, and SL, but that won't mean nearly as much, right? Just wondering. Subscribed and look forward to seeing this develop!

When i test and optimize, I usually do not alter too many details. I only change few parameters which have big impact. and also while testing, i have reasonable gap. Thats given in the spreadsheet.

But few people have asked me to test their settings and so are the results.

I think signal on the current Lite 3 version is very good, trailing stop is actually helping us maximize the returns from the signal. So you can see the bigger profits based on just trail stop changes.

I think we cannot get best 100% winners on signals, we can only get high probability. And this EA does give that.


Well done guys on this good EA.
  • #849
  • Mar 3, 2019 11:09pm Mar 3, 2019 11:09pm
That being said, and given the results from the three tests, what do you chase?

Do you even look at ending account balance or is it more of a profit factor/DD type situation?
  • #850
  • Mar 3, 2019 11:11pm Mar 3, 2019 11:11pm
Quoting tradeChaser
That being said, and given the results from the three tests, what do you chase? Do you even look at ending account balance or is it more of a profit factor/DD type situation?

For me personally i would see Absolute dd & Relative DD then profit factor.
  • #851
  • Mar 3, 2019 11:52pm Mar 3, 2019 11:52pm
Quoting tradeChaser
Awesome Thread and brilliant minds at work here. EA's fascinate me, but looking at some of these back tests, I do have to ask (those that have been there, done that)... When you go down to changing SL and TP by just a couple pips here an there, is that not curve fitting? I mean with enough adjustments, you are bound to get to that magic mix of Tral, Step, and SL, but that won't mean nearly as much, right? Just wondering. Subscribed and look forward to seeing this develop!
most indicator uses some magical setting one way or another, how many candles, 70/30, (12,26,9),(30,2,2) ... etc etc
  • #852
  • Mar 4, 2019 12:07am Mar 4, 2019 12:07am
Quoting tradeChaser
That being said, and given the results from the three tests, what do you chase? Do you even look at ending account balance or is it more of a profit factor/DD type situation?
i'm looking for anything more than 51% winning rate haha
  • #853
  • Mar 4, 2019 12:46am Mar 4, 2019 12:46am
In an effort to spice up the thread, does anyone have any backtesting done on M15?

Open Candles Only looks pretty interesting, but I don't have any tick data...
  • #854
  • Mar 4, 2019 2:41am Mar 4, 2019 2:41am
@Feex,

can you make number of orders to 3.

I think now, it is only one at a time. Until it close that order it wont open another order. So starting day and time matters for how the EA behaves for each one.
  • #855
  • Mar 4, 2019 4:30am Mar 4, 2019 4:30am
Quoting cdsaa
{quote} Trailing Stop- 41, Step- 23 and SL- 116 {image} Trailing Stop-30 Step-2 and Other Settings default. {image} Trailing Stop -23 and step -2 {image} {file} {file} {file}
thank you for testing my settings
  • #856
  • Mar 4, 2019 8:14am Mar 4, 2019 8:14am
Newbie trader here.. I'm looking for a profitable strategy in the 1 hr time frame. Hope I could get some good insights in this thread
  • #857
  • Mar 4, 2019 10:41am Mar 4, 2019 10:41am
Can someone has test the high risk set?
  • #858
  • Edited 12:34pm Mar 4, 2019 12:19pm | Edited 12:34pm
Quoting majamivice
{quote} Ok. Here is with Tickstory data without errors. Ultron_lite: {image} {image} ULTRON-3.4_Exponential_MM_TR: {image} {image}
After further analysis, I concede that Ultron_lite is better. I was testing it with an improper configuration compared to the Ultron-3.4_Exponential_MM_TR.

Ultron_Lite_3 using the risk ratio option with trailing stop seems to produce the best results, as well as maintain the highest win rate. I've found that TrailingStop = 30 and TrailingStep = 12 seems to work well.
  • #859
  • Mar 4, 2019 12:20pm Mar 4, 2019 12:20pm
Quoting SigmaEnigma
{quote} After further analysis, I concede that Ultron_lite is better. I was testing it with an improper configuration compared to the Ultron-3.4_Exponential_MM_TR. Ultron_Lite_3 using the risk ratio option with trailing stop seems to produce the best results, as well as maintain the highest win rate.
I got the same outcome testing all 3 in BT.
Green pips to all
  • #860
  • Mar 4, 2019 1:44pm Mar 4, 2019 1:44pm
Quoting SigmaEnigma
{quote} After further analysis, I concede that Ultron_lite is better. I was testing it with an improper configuration compared to the Ultron-3.4_Exponential_MM_TR. Ultron_Lite_3 using the risk ratio option with trailing stop seems to produce the best results, as well as maintain the highest win rate. I've found that TrailingStop = 30 and TrailingStep = 12 seems to work well.
Can you explain the risk ratio settings and how it works? I am unsure what this variable is and does.

Thanks in advance
3 traders viewing now