Check-average profit 250p/monthly

Hi,
Average monthly profit of three robots over a period of over 2 years is more than 250 pts.
If you are interested in my way of making money
Check my results on a regular basis on https://minorfx.eu

I try to capture the moments in which I have a statistical advantage, and recurring transactions should bring profit.

... and as you can see it works...

Only one robot uses the indicator.
The other two robots are based on "time", which in my opinion is accumulation.
I am trying to capture moments in which someone "bigger" buys and then tries to sell it.

yours service is regulated can we trust ?

can admin set me commercial member?

Lookin' good Minor.

Is your bot a directional trader?

And how do your other two bots work?
I assume they adjust parameters to changing market conditions.

Nope, all I can see is a journal which can be created easily.

now that you became commercial you need a bit more than simple images to prove and back up your statement about the profit,cos you guys always start talking about profit and never mention the loss the loss ALWAYS come and you guys always forget to mention it.
so... the easiest way is to have one simple TE with visible performance ,or in case you dont want to do that as youre not forecd of course,please add one important disclaimer about using robots in forex. I consider the most dangerous thing to use strange robots in forex and the easiest way to lose all your money.
one disclaimer about the RISK will be welcome and will show as well your good intentions,you must admit around are people who dont have yet full image for the real risk and so they might lose money,they might get problems in their lifes ,and all this because they are new to this and buy one EA from you and you didnt took the chance to explain them the BIG risk. you must always remember that is not always about money.
cheer up

I believe that strength lies in simplicity.
These are not complicated robots that predict algorithms of other bots, etc.
All bots are Daily and do not check the trend either short-term or long-term
Dxbeta - M1 and supports the pointer looking for a local hole
Dxsigma and dxomega - they always open positions at the same time. Buy or sell choose based on the preceding candles.

On my site, every month has a link to youtube where the full profit and loss report is shown

You are absolutely right that you need to inform about the possibility of loss, but why do you say that I do not do it?
- until recently, on my site it was written "that I would like to make new traders aware that losses can not be avoided. It will be good then if total profits would be greater than losses" 21/02/2019 I modified the content on the site.
- I know that there should be a message about the risk and this message will be on my website soon (as soon as I find some time)
- on the sub page EA Dax it is written what is the maximum relative loss and what is the effectiveness of each robot separately
- on my site, every month has a link to youtube where the full profit and loss report is shown
- as you can see on the attached table there are months when there is a total loss of three EA

an example of a youtube report

Let us understand each other well. I have no intention of convincing anyone to my robots. There are probably many other more profitable robots and strategies on the market. I've lost a lot of forex money before and I do not want anyone to experience as much stress as I do.
I also can not guarantee that my EA will bring profits a year or two later. NOBODY can not guarantee such a thing and if it guarantees it means that it is a cheater !.
However, in my opinion, it is more likely that the robots will be profitable than not. And that's it.
If someone would like to diversify their wallet and does not have an idea of their idea, he can try to join my EA.

If you do not check the trend, are you saying your bot is non-directional? If the bots open at the same time, is that buy and sell hedging? Do the bots make any adjustments to each other, or are they only used to diversify your trades?

bots are non-directional,
I may have expressed myself badly
-sigma opens at 8:06 UMT 0
-omega opens at 8:05 UMT 0
both have a different SL and TP and the way to choose buy or sell, it may also happen that:
-sigma buy and omega buy
-a can happen that sigma buy and omega sell
each of them works for their profit

Okay, so non-directional. What is the drawdown...? Are you fully hedged?

I do not really understand what you mean?

Non-directional trading carries a drawdown if it is
statistical arbitrage (which can be diversified) and
is a buy and a sell from the same broker of correlated
pairs. With currency pairs you would buy and sell
two different but correlated pairs at the exact same
time (twice the commission) and also sell/net them
at the same time.

If partially hedged (same broker) there is some risk that
can be diversified. If fully hedged there is approximately
no risk, but that would be a buy and a sell of the exact
same currency pair from two different brokers.

If the algorithm works you make a small profit just
about every time and with low risk. This should give
a smoothly positive equity curve - which is what a
smooth and gradual equity curve implies. Thus a
much higher return and much lower risk than
directional trading (why would anyone trade directionally
when 99% lose everything?). Non-directional is what
65% of the hedge funds do. The inherent low risk is
not due to excellent management of directional risks,
instead non-directional does not have those risks:
stop loss risk, wrong direction risk, mistaking a
retracement for a reversal risk, emotion risk, getting
out of a profit trade too early risk, news risk, margin
risk, overtrading risk, mistake risk, external shock risk,
etc.

Those risks we've all have personal experience with -
they are unavoidable. That's why directional traders
lose, at least 99 out of 100, or maybe more.

As I re-read your posts it looks like you are Directional
trading because you mention:
"I am trying to capture moments in which someone "bigger" buys
and then tries to sell it."
That indicates a directional counter-trade requiring stop losses.
So two EAs determine a specific statistical level of accumulation,
maybe from level 2 or volume, then EA1 enters a trade once other
standard deviation) parameters are hit for the entry trigger. Just
guessing, with no actual clue.

Honestly, I've never practiced arbitration and hedging. Although I read a little about this subject, but it seems to me that you have much more knowledge about it than I do.
Each of my robots works separately, it is not arbitrage or hedging.
I try to take advantage of the statistical advantage and that's it.
They are intended only for index dax.
Personally, I use these three EAs simultaneously on one account, Dax CFD, MT4 platform.

Okay, I understand. I was curious because I may be soon be starting a
commercial thread. I have a non-directional "club" with a low risk and
high return track record for about the same length of time you have.
Using four institutional-grade algorithms that cost a lot to develop and
computerized adaptive money management. Took three years.

The two key success factors of non-directional trading over directional
trading are low risk - because 1) you don't a manage risk - the method
simply avoids it, and 2) steady consistent returns that (because of
1 and 2) allow you to compound profits, and that's where the exponential
magic happens. Essentially you bank the smaller profits over and over
(so you accumulate them off the table), but risk does not accumulate as
it is turned over with each new trade and stays just about the same. As
W. Buffet said, you need to have something that makes money while
you sleep to really make money, and that means compounding. The
sharp volatility of directional wins and losses do not allow compounding.

Can't say more, don't want to step on your thread. Looks like you might
have a winner set of EAs! Probably should get onto MyFXbook for a
verified track-record with risk statistics that can be compared to others.

I've been directional trading for fifteen years, including for a hedge fund,
and consider myself lucky to have broken even, after winning and losing
big numbers, but that does not count those thousands of wasted hours
sitting in front of a screen rather than walking the beach. Counting that,
I am deep in the hole. So now I'd only do non-directional trading, but
you need computer based analysis and specialized and optimized algos
only available to hedge funds. Hope to change that.