cause v effect
peak v trough
support v resistance
relative v comparative
AND
fractal - of course how much more complicated can a system be ? maybe not as complex as ourselves our anatomy but doesn't make it any easier because of the multiple layers that it consists of, even if I wanted to specialize in something I'd have to cover the basics first without first understanding the anatomy of its structure I won't be able to specialize in anything point black. I've tried simplifying, it doesn't work. I've tried very hard to simplify LOL. There's no shortcut. Gotcha. More suffering bring it on.
I'm only beginning to see what Jupiter meant by these words, scratching the surface still BUT a whole lot of improvement than where I was a year ago.
So what had happened its been an uptrend ?
well the trouble started at 11308 last high (now I understand Gann, how he used to buy at new high and Jupiter what he meant by move + PB trading inside the oscillations) but this wasn't the real low low and LH was still missing the real trouble began when 281 broke because that's where the HL on the opposite was it was taken out, PB back to previous support now turned to resistance :: fractal , tiny universe operating by its law of vibration, wheel within wheel perfect description or oscillation::: then second HL at 251 is out move +PB yesterday London open this move had completed at 11163 previous peak initial down wave from 281 ends there at least for a while because relatively speaking 11163 this new low is still a high low , comparatively speaking its a LL (did I mistake the two relative comparative but it makes sense and I get the gist).
Now what , I should get back to the sequence that made sense but try to incorporate these two forces let's try taking relative force into consideration along with classic definition of a trend HH HL, LH LL from the comparative side both 228 , 251 so if this force was to take it on full force there should be a retest ?? however both of these resistance levels got taken out and now there was a new high at 281 if the comparative force isn't taking full control maybe I should look into the other, relative force with new high there was also new low at 228 this looked good but then 251 which is the previous high and LH failed to provide support both of these forces gives leeway to the development, the new comparative force emerges as of now I see 228, out I also see a LL and LH now the tiny vibration will take control from 228, I think the resolution came about at 228 which is also the cause, tiny vibration = the effect is what I should look out for.
peak v trough
support v resistance
relative v comparative
AND
fractal - of course how much more complicated can a system be ? maybe not as complex as ourselves our anatomy but doesn't make it any easier because of the multiple layers that it consists of, even if I wanted to specialize in something I'd have to cover the basics first without first understanding the anatomy of its structure I won't be able to specialize in anything point black. I've tried simplifying, it doesn't work. I've tried very hard to simplify LOL. There's no shortcut. Gotcha. More suffering bring it on.
I'm only beginning to see what Jupiter meant by these words, scratching the surface still BUT a whole lot of improvement than where I was a year ago.
So what had happened its been an uptrend ?
well the trouble started at 11308 last high (now I understand Gann, how he used to buy at new high and Jupiter what he meant by move + PB trading inside the oscillations) but this wasn't the real low low and LH was still missing the real trouble began when 281 broke because that's where the HL on the opposite was it was taken out, PB back to previous support now turned to resistance :: fractal , tiny universe operating by its law of vibration, wheel within wheel perfect description or oscillation::: then second HL at 251 is out move +PB yesterday London open this move had completed at 11163 previous peak initial down wave from 281 ends there at least for a while because relatively speaking 11163 this new low is still a high low , comparatively speaking its a LL (did I mistake the two relative comparative but it makes sense and I get the gist).
Now what , I should get back to the sequence that made sense but try to incorporate these two forces let's try taking relative force into consideration along with classic definition of a trend HH HL, LH LL from the comparative side both 228 , 251 so if this force was to take it on full force there should be a retest ?? however both of these resistance levels got taken out and now there was a new high at 281 if the comparative force isn't taking full control maybe I should look into the other, relative force with new high there was also new low at 228 this looked good but then 251 which is the previous high and LH failed to provide support both of these forces gives leeway to the development, the new comparative force emerges as of now I see 228, out I also see a LL and LH now the tiny vibration will take control from 228, I think the resolution came about at 228 which is also the cause, tiny vibration = the effect is what I should look out for.
...
