Money Flow Trading Method along with Risk Management

Hi BenjaminIs, sorry for the late, better late than never., not ignoring you, I just forgot because of my job., but hopefully I will do it today. take care.

OK Thanks Tomorrow !!!

Hi BenjaminIs, this is my personal and humble opinion, would not that be better to OPEN a LIVE with MICRO account, you know what I mean, you know better than anyone, the difference between Demo and Live account.

what's your expert opinion about GOLD/SILVER, nowadays, is this the right time to buy them(physically)??

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/w...l-correctness/

1013
Blog/Pension Crisis
Posted Jan 25, 2019 by Martin Armstrong
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...a-Pensions.jpg


COMMENT: Good day;
The great public pension fraud here in Ontario, Canada allowed the public service unions to endorse Liberal candidates who would give them their 3% raises every contract. This gave them an 18% head start (the number of public sector employees) to win an election that only required 34% to gain power.
The percentage of Liberal voters rises since children of public employees are likely to vote the same as their parents.


Even when Conservative’s hit the campaign trail, they too promised better civil pay because they knew 1/5th the voters worked for the government. Corrupt as hell!

Your comment on government pensions hits the mark. Ontario is the largest by population of 14 million. The number of public service employees is nuts, 18.6% (1.3 million) of the total employed. The pension burden is enormous. As private wages have stagnated for 2 decades now, pension and benefit costs came out of the employee’s wages, but our civil servants got the raises and the benefits.

Suspicions are the current employees are paying today’s pensioners but data is held close to the chest.
Analysts find it difficult to gather data on public pension funds. Go figure, we funded it. But it is clear they are finding excuses to either hire more or at least keep current levels.

What is upsetting, I never found anyone besides you who realized these changes. And you’re not even Canadian. It’s terrible how politicians could create this divide between the working people in both public and private classes. The fuse is ready to light.
Stick around for the fireworks, it’ll be a show.
RH

REPLY: The pension crisis is not unbelievable. A blind man can see that this system is simply going to meltdown and lead to serious civil unrest. Why I am often the only one saying things is fairly simple. It is not that I am the ONLY person capable of seeing such a trend. The problem stems from the fact that I am INDEPENDENT and we are not a one-man-band newsletter. We have the resources and are global and have always been. Therein lies the distinction. Because we are global, we have to monitor the world. We have been the LARGEST institutional adviser with more than 25,000 institutions stemming from back in the 1990s.

Now, how did that ever happen? It was actually explained to me at lunch in Geneva by one of the heads of a major Swiss bank. He pointed out that there were no real European analysts that anyone listened to because that all had to be politically correct. The top analysts are at banks and brokerages. They CANNOT come out and say the euro will crash or the system is screwed because that will then be attributed to the bank or brokerage house and they will instantly lose their job.

Here is an Advertisement by Merrill Lynch from 1975 as the economy was crashing into the worst economic recession since the Great Depression. Paul Volcker explained in 1979: “By the early 1970s, the persistence of inflationary pressures, even in the face of mild recession, began to flash some danger signals; the responses of the economy to the twisting of the dials of monetary and fiscal policy no longer seemed quite so predictable. But it was not until the events of 1974 and 1975, when a recession sprung on an unsuspecting world with an intensity unmatched in the post-World War II period, that the lessons of the ‘New Economics’ were seriously challenged.”
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...cast-alone.png

There is no bank or brokerage house that has EVERforecast the top in a market. They do not try to do that unless they are trying to sell you bonds. There is a new documentary film coming out soon. I managed to get a few RETIRING bond dealers who worked in banks to appear and explain how the ECB has destroyed the bond market. They could NEVERspeak out when working for the bank. The central bank would be on the phone demanding they be fired.
You must understand that 99% of the professional analysts work for institutions that must be politically correct. We were the FIRST to do FOREXglobally. That is why we grew internationally. There were 37 countries represented at the WEC in Orlando. Nobody puts together such global audiences. No analyst could say the pound would crash or the D-Mark because it was not politically correct no matter what they personally believed. Consequently, there is no other analytical firm that even visits central banks on all continents. We have no conflicts of interest. That is ESSENTIAL. The top analysts at major banks or institutions cannot get in the door for they represent proprietary trading by institutions which presents conflicts of interest.


So the reason it is often me standing alone is complicated, but it all stems from politics. By no means am I really the only person who sees what is coming. Other Canadian analysts cannot come out and say, “OMG!” their employers would respond, “OMG! You’re fired!”


Categories: Pension Crisis
Tags: media sensorship, politically correct
« Outlaw Government Pensions? The Hunt for Endless Taxes
REGISTER FOR BLOG UPDATE ALERTS
If you are human, leave this field blank.
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...jax_loader.gif
BLOG CATEGORIES

1. +Armstrong Economics 101
2. +Armstrong in the Media
3. +Forecasts
4. +History
5. Hong Kong
6. +International News
7. Market Talk
8. +Markets by Sector
9. Plagues
10. +Products and Services
11. Q&A
12. Real Estate
13. Uncategorized
14. +Upcoming Events
15. +World Events

PROMOTIONS
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...eo-273x140.jpg

1. PROMO

Instructional Videos
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...k-socrates.jpg

1. PROMO

Socrates
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...ip-273x140.jpg

1. PROMO

Models and Methodologies
https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.ne...EC-273x140.gif

1. PROMO

2018 World Economic Conferences
BLOG ARCHIVES

1. January 2019
2. December 2018
3. November 2018
4. October 2018
5. September 2018
6. August 2018

View All

Good Morning my friend.

Your questions are excellent and right to the point. The SECRET to being a successful Forex trader is by learning to trade by removing FEAR and GREED and your EGO most of all.

The market is always right. There are no exceptions to this rule. If you cannot make profits of 5% each month that you trade Forex there is something wrong. 95% of all Forex traders both commercial and retail lose their capital and the second part of my answer to you involves capital that you trade with.

I have traded real funds since March 9, 2006 to be exact. Whenever I traded with $5000 US dollars , I lost my money. When I traded with $10,000 US dollars I would eventually have the same results. I have determined through trial and error with real funds that $50,000 US dollars must be the minimum amount.

Why is this ? The KEY to trading Forex with leverage of 100 to 1 is RISK MANAGEMENT.

My foolproof solution is to never trade more than 20% of your capital funds at any one time. So I never use more then $10,000 US dollars in my Forex trading account while trading. Since the MAXIMUM LOSS for each Forex Trading Plan is 5% of your trading capital as long as you win over 50% of all your Forex trades and have a STOP LOSS of $1000 US dollars on any open trading contract it is impossible to lose more than 5% of your trading capital for any of the 5 Trading Plans already established until March 31, 2019. Please post here any follow up questions that you have.

The second part of my RISK MANAGEMENT plan that always works as long as the Forex trader can control their FEAR and their GREED.

That is done by having the 100% rule that no one Trade Plan can lose more than 5% of their Forex trading capital. I decide every three months which are my 5 Forex Trading plans.

Until March 31, 2019 the five Forex trading plans are as follows;

(1) SHORT US30 (Dow 30)
(2) SHORT SP500
(3) Long Gold
(4) Long Silver
(5) SHORT USD/JPY (CORRELATION FOREX TRADE)

We trade NO OTHER Forex currency or CFD. (Contracts for Difference)

The next KEY is using my self developed over 16 years MONEY FLOW METHOD.

What does that mean ? Each day when we see at the start of the trading day which is set as 8:30 AM Eastern Standard Time or GMT plus 5 then we know at that moment by looking at the DOW FUTURES whether we have RISK ON or RISK OFF. Of course in this trading environment this can change in seconds.

This leads to another KEY FACT about Forex traders that depend mainly on Technical Indicators. If you do that then you are guaranteed to lose money trading Forex. You need to first factor in MONEY FLOW as the first fundamental that you use. Each day we will see MONEY FLOW from Bonds to Equities or the other way around if we have RISK OFF. The largest market in the world are the Bond markets.

This post should give you good starting insight into my proven 100% Forex trading method. I have traded one account at the start of my Forex trading career with real funds that had $100,000 US dollars in the account. I traded this account for exactly 35 days and my Net Profit was over $19,000 US dollars and my winning percentage of my Forex trades was over 75%. I have been an introducing broker for FXCM in New York and Questrade in Toronto and AVA Trade in Ireland.

I need to watch your Forex trading for 90 days in order to see if you have first the DISCIPLINE to be any kind of trader whether Commodity or Equity trader.

I need to see if you can deal with your FEAR and your GREED. Your results will show me and yourself that.

The only way that I can teach anyone is through communication. That is why it is essential that anyone here that really wants to learn must post on this thread with their questions. You questions today led to all of my answers.

Thank you very much for your interest and attention.


Benjaminis
BWM

Good Morning BenjaminIs, thanks for your reply, must be an overlooked for my 2nd part of the question, about GOLD/SILVER, Plz advise when you have time. As far as your saying quoted below:-



The SECRET to being a successful Forex trader is by learning to trade by removing FEAR and GREED and your EGO most of all.
these three most important habits, do you think one can overcome with the demo practice?? being a lay man, a novice in front of you, I think I can face these three things, FEAR, GREED & EGO when I am doing Live trading., but you are my future Mentor, so you know the best. take care.

Smart way to structure your trading plan imo. Quick clarification. Your 5 trading plans listed is all based on Risk "OFF" sentiment until March 2019. So with 5% risk per plan, Am I right in saying you are risking 25% of your $10K trading capital in one or across all 5 accounts? Risk on/off situations happen several times every day driven by irrational exuberance i.e. retard traders/followers. What is your take profit % for each of these trading plans? (apologize if you have already answered this before)

Also, are the instruments in each of the trading plan a constant/fixed since 2006? I could do the first 4 with one futures contract so curious what would you replace UJ spot with? Also, are all entries made via a basket of 5 plans or one at a time at different times?

Not sure if you got this.... he expects you to have a minimum of $50K trading capital reserves to ensure your demo modelling framework is exactly going to look like live. Micro-live account size will defeat the purpose of his design as greed will override fear and patience when trading small. Primary reason for failure imo. Demo amount has to be the exact same structure as live account.... just my 2 cents

Hi VEEFX, thanks for your kind words & advice. 50k ???, together, I’ve never seen in my whole life., and I am not sure if I could see it

Before I die. That could be my wish.



I know you are an experienced trader, but I beg to differ, with the Demo account, brokers have no interest with you, BUT with the Live account,

For sure they do have., you know what I mean. Demo and Live trading cannot be the same, this is my personal opinion. I had experienced

For both. with the Demo, we can make money whatever we want. But with Live account, 90+% failure rate, why???? You know better than

Me.



If BenjaminIs thinks that I would invest 50k in the future(live account), I wish I could., but the ground reality is that I cannot. I belong

To middle class family struggling to make both ends meet. But hope for the best. take care.

Hello Everyone

I will answer a few questions now. First of all learning by trading a $50,000 US dollars DEMO trading account for 90 days lets you see if you have what it takes to be a winner.

You cannot learn on a live account without losing all your money. All that I have done is to use my 16 years of hands on experience. I started trading my demo accounts during 2003. I demo traded for three years before I made my first real Forex trade with Trade Freedom in Montreal using the SAXO platforrm.

I managed over $100,000.00 US dollars for 5 or 6 clients. During early June 2006 , I moved all my business and clients over to Man Financial in Montreal. During 2006, I was managing OVER $250,000 US dollars for many clients trading under LPOA. So when I tell you things , I have DONE it all.

I now make over 15% Return on Investment each month winning over 75% of all my Forex trades.

I will answer all the other questions over the weekend.


Benjaminis
BWM

Thanks for the reply BenjaminIs, is my Demo user ID & PW, ok?? because when I opened it, FXCM uk, never asked me about the fund.

When you have time, could you plz check and let me know if anything wrong. Do you want me to open it again if yousend me the link.



Advise plz. thanks

Hello

I will log into your FXCM UK platform later. As you can see from my Screenshots I have done 3 FX Trades and 2 are now closed with profits of $716.25 US dollars.

I have one open position.

Making 1% each day or $500 US dollars works out to 20% return on investment.
So far today my locked in profit is over $700 US dollars. It is easy when you know how. We have 20 Forex trading days each month.

Have a pleasant weekend.


Benjaminis
BWM

You too have wonderful weekend.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...ops+to+zero%29

Those who can't do, demand...
Profit propels civilization. When a producer can make an item or provide a service at a cost lower than a customer values that item or service, and the customer has the means and the freedom to buy, the difference between what’s paid over cost is profit. That profit is the producer’s incentive to produce, and in turn funds the producer’s consumption, savings, and investment, which creates other producers’ profits. Profit is the necessary prerequisite for consumption, savings, investment, and consequently, progress.
Many of us profit every day. We offer services and provide goods, supporting ourselves at a cost that is lower than what we’re paid. We’re profitably competent, engaging in honest production and peaceful, voluntary exchange. The only alternatives to profitable competence are living off of someone else’s profitable competency via inheritance or charity, or criminality—theft via fraud or violence.
Criminals cloak their thefts in all sorts of justifications, some of which, like socialism, become full-blown political doctrines. Ironically, a larcenous litany of demands and rationalizations are efflorescing at a time when whatever is left of the overall profit pool has been drained. It has been mortgaged multiple times, just as hordes of the unprofitably incompetent, who had no hand in producing it, clamor for their “fair share.” They’ll insist the profitably competent figure out how to pay for it, but the fair share of nothing is nothing, political promises to the contrary notwithstanding.
“Your means, my ends; I wish, you fulfill,” is the foundational fantasy of modern governance. The favored groups shelter in their safe spaces—government and its rackets, crony corporations, academia, the media, and Hollywood—living on the delusion that there will always be someone who will produce, without question or protest, for their benefit. Upon that foundation they’ve constructed a phantasmagorical edifice of illusory constructs and passages to nowhere.
As the foundational fantasy totters, the fantasies it supports become more fantastical. The profit pool exhausted, you would think everything possible would be done to succor the profitably competent who are supposed to replenish it. Instead, that illustrious group is demonized at every turn, and the demands on them become ever more absurd. They are guilty because they’re productive, and must expiate their guilt by producing for the unproductive, whose incompetence makes them morally superior.
The most “toxic” trait often associated with masculinity may be competence. It’s not exclusively masculine, but whether its possessors are male or female it has certainly become toxic, depriving them of any right to what they produce and any right to criticize those who steal it from them. Twits who can’t replace a light bulb demand free schooling and medical care, guaranteed jobs and incomes, trips to Mars, and who knows what else. Those who are to fund it all are to cheerfully regard doing so as a privilege.
The notion of reparations won’t die. Anyone with money (the only people who can pay) supposedly owe the descendants of various victim classes reparations for the supposed sins of their ancestors. To hold individuals guilty of crimes they couldn’t have committed is a moral obscenity. The demands for retribution are simply another naked money grab.
The rhetoric grows increasingly hateful. The slave class can be openly disparaged, denigrated, and deplored based on their race, gender, geographic location, religion, politics, the way they smile at a Native American, or any other characteristic the masters don’t like. But woe to the slaves who utter anything the tyrannical cult deems offensive or incorrect. Transgressors are put through social media hell, ostracized, ruined, and coming soon, incarcerated.
If you’ve found your safe space and you’re incapable of producing marketable value that exceeds its cost of production, you’re dependent on the profitably competent, but their very existence is a constant reproach, a reminder of your own inadequacy. So where gratitude would be appropriate, you instead hate, mock, and abuse your meal tickets. This isn’t PhD in psychology material—spoiled children have been abusing their parents for centuries. Interestingly—at least for psychology PhDs—the dependent get more abusive as they get more dependent.
Their safe spaces require little or nothing in the way of competency. They have become havens for personal predilections and peccadilloes that were once socially unacceptable, virtually free from any standards of comportment or dress, and citadels of venomous, self-serving ideologies.
One month into the partial shutdown of the largest safe space, it’s obvious that not only has the sky not fallen, but unsurprisingly, America is doing just fine without those 800,000 furloughed workers that even the government considers nonessential. Which elicits the question: What were they doing when they were on the job?
“Not much” is not necessarily the right answer. The 100,000 plus pages of the Federal Register and the tax code suggest that they’ve been spending a lot of time gumming up the works for and extracting money from the profitably competent many of them despise. The furlough may accomplish the first step of breaking America’s addiction to government: realizing that most of it is not only useless, but harmful. We’ll see if it leads to the next steps: getting rid of personnel, programs, agencies, and entire departments, and changing policy accordingly (we can dream). If things change in that direction, expect the denizens of what are no longer safe spaces to become increasingly vitriolic.
You can’t reach a point where dependents openly denigrate those who support them without the latter’s tacit or explicit consent. Parents who spoil their children and endure the brats’ abuse get what they deserve. Ayn Rand had it right. The people who make America go could bring it to a shuddering stop simply by stockpiling their resources and walking off their jobs for a month or two. An added turn of the screw would be withdrawing their funds from the banking system (see “The Yellow Vests Get it Right,” SLL).
It’s time to stop funding the abusers, time to stop excusing them with “they mean well, but…”, time to reject their claims to moral superiority, time to stop building safe space sanctuaries, time to stop apologizing for profitable competence, and time to recognize its moral value and reclaim the right to its profits. If it takes a strike to hurl the brats into the maw of their own incompetence and upend the tyrannical cult, so be it. The biggest crime hasn’t been that of the brats and the cult, it’s been the failure of those who haven’t defended what’s rightfully theirs.

Good Morning

You must listen to this entire presentation. If there is anything that you do not understand please post your question or questions here and I will answer you. This is one of the most revealing presentations that I have ever seen in my 75 years of life. I can assure you that what is revealed is based on world history.

The history is not very pleasant and it is not meant to be because we are pawns in a sick and evil world. However there is HOPE.


Benjamin Israel
BWM