Micro martingale with small capital | Page 163 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD

Similar Threads

Martingale, Anti-martingale, and Compounding 40 replies

Martingale, Reverse Martingale, Modified Martingale, Maths 1 reply

Martingale Calculation EA (also reverse martingale) 3 replies

How to change this Martingale to Reverse Martingale ? 3 replies

Martingale vs. Non Martingale (Simplified RoR vs Profit) 1 reply

Attachments: Micro martingale with small capital
Exit Attachments

Micro martingale with small capital

  • #3,241
  • Jan 9, 2019 1:16pm Jan 9, 2019 1:16pm
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} can i ask about dd? do you have an idea of qhat capital looked like when it happened. this based on continues running of the EA, in reality trader would regularly withdraw money, ot would be very interesting if something like that could be added to the ea, only for testing maybe. so let say i start at 10000, at some point i have 10000 profit so i decided to withdraw 5000, so the lot calculation should be based in 15000. i think this way we should be able to capture, as much as possible, the activity of a real account. apart from that, i...
1. DD for a year is still large, occurs under certain conditions, must be partially tested per month to determine the conditions that make a large DD. To reduce DD there are still many ways to change settings and of course Profit decreases too.
2. I also think about doing in BT, I see how it turns out that there is a trick to making a withdrawal in BT, I'll try it.
3. BT with the timeframe of all TFs, but the result is with M1

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,242
  • Jan 9, 2019 1:17pm Jan 9, 2019 1:17pm
Quoting jereajali
{quote} Boss, This is a great work o. i am intrigued. This is for the next version right ? i can see 1_09_4 there.
Right for the next version, hopefully the final can be finished

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,243
  • Jan 9, 2019 2:03pm Jan 9, 2019 2:03pm
I'm trying to understand how this EA works. Using set file A. Under what condition will this basket of trades close?

Also, the EA opened 2 trades near the top (1.15535) instead of just one - is this a bug?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 51 KB
  • #3,244
  • Jan 9, 2019 2:13pm Jan 9, 2019 2:13pm
Quoting lolpie
I'm trying to understand how this EA works. Using set file A. Under what condition will this basket of trades close? Also, the EA opened 2 trades near the top (1.15535) instead of just one - is this a bug? {image}
This EA uses several for closing
1. SL / TP
2. Trailing
3. Percentage of Profit Traiing
4. Close all if Over DD
Point 1-4 all can work, but in BT or default this uses number 3 (Profit Trailing Percentage) which consists of Profit_Lock_Firsttime, Profit_TrailingStart and Profit_TrailingStop

The percentage is based on the use of margins on the Chart / magic number.

In your chart, it is normal and still waiting for the minimum profit to be reached Margin 367 and profit not yet reach, wait until close all.


Not a bug, the transaction at the peak is normal, the check statement in Comment shows which Grid.

** About the calculation for open order there is a correlation with Marting_Min_Grid, Marting_Multiplication, Grid_Time_Minute, Grid_Pause, Grid_Release

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,245
  • Jan 9, 2019 6:44pm Jan 9, 2019 6:44pm
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} can i ask about dd? do you have an idea of qhat capital looked like when it happened. this based on continues running of the EA, in reality trader would regularly withdraw money, ot would be very interesting if something like that could be added to the ea, only for testing maybe. so let say i start at 10000, at some point i have 10000 profit so i decided to withdraw 5000, so the lot calculation should be based in 15000. i think this way we should be able to capture, as much as possible, the activity of a real account. apart from that, i...
Hi F.G

I tried adding the Withdrawal function at BT, no error but it didn't work. It turns out that the function works for MT5.
Another way is to fill in the Budget_Allocation.
Capital = 2000
Budget_Allocation = 80%
On start Trade with 2000 X 80% = 1600
For example in cycle 1 of profit 200, in the second cycle is
2200 X 80% = 1760 ..... and so on
The results are as follows

Rgds
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Capture31.PNG Size: 20 KB
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,246
  • Jan 10, 2019 12:31am Jan 10, 2019 12:31am
Quoting mrgmrg
{quote} Hi F.G I tried adding the Withdrawal function at BT, no error but it didn't work. It turns out that the function works for MT5. Another way is to fill in the Budget_Allocation. Capital = 2000 Budget_Allocation = 80% On start Trade with 2000 X 80% = 1600 For example in cycle 1 of profit 200, in the second cycle is 2200 X 80% = 1760 ..... and so on The results are as follows Rgds {image}
I guess that this are the results based on 100000???
  • #3,247
  • Jan 10, 2019 12:32am Jan 10, 2019 12:32am
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} I guess that this are the results based on 100000???
No, Start from 2000
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,248
  • Jan 10, 2019 12:34am Jan 10, 2019 12:34am
Quoting mrgmrg
{quote} 1. DD for a year is still large, occurs under certain conditions, must be partially tested per month to determine the conditions that make a large DD. To reduce DD there are still many ways to change settings and of course Profit decreases too. Rgds
The way, that i see it, is that price keeps moving in the opposite direction of the cycle. so or you enough money to withstand the dd or hedge?
what do you think
  • #3,249
  • Jan 10, 2019 12:54am Jan 10, 2019 12:54am
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} The way, that i see it, is that price keeps moving in the opposite direction of the cycle. so or you enough money to withstand the dd or hedge? what do you think
Yups, Reversal system.
In setfile A, without hedging or locking.

Only optimizing multipliers, lots of variations for smaller or larger profit targets, and reduced DD.
For example, if the target profit is only 1000% / year, it certainly can be with small DD. But if the target is above 10000%, surely DD will be bigger.

Even though the M1 timeframe and profit target are around 25% per cycle, it is still capable of nig profits.

Maybe the implementation can be like this:
Every week 50% of the profit is transferred to another account in one broker to reserve if there is a big DD.

I tried it with a Live account, it is still in accordance with BT, but in a short time it hasn't reflected long-term stability


But ... later when it's released, please prove it.

If I live the test in a month as expected, the possibility of EA is finished, just a matter of setting, and Im can migration from coder ti trader …..lol.

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,250
  • Jan 10, 2019 1:23am Jan 10, 2019 1:23am
Quoting mrgmrg
{quote} Yups, Reversal system. In setfile A, without hedging or locking. Only optimizing multipliers, lots of variations for smaller or larger profit targets, and reduced DD. For example, if the target profit is only 1000% / year, it certainly can be with small DD. But if the target is above 10000%, surely DD will be bigger. Even though the M1 timeframe and profit target are around 25% per cycle, it is still capable of nig profits. Maybe the implementation can be like this: Every week 50% of the profit is transferred to another account in one broker...
25% of initial capital, wow that is ambitious. but your system seems capable of achieving that
  • #3,251
  • Jan 10, 2019 1:26am Jan 10, 2019 1:26am
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} 25% of initial capital, wow that is ambitious. but your system seems capable of achieving that
If the profit wants to be lowered by a smaller DD, it's only a matter of custom settings

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,252
  • Jan 10, 2019 1:32am Jan 10, 2019 1:32am
Quoting mrgmrg
{quote} If the profit wants to be lowered by a smaller DD, it's only a matter of custom settings Rgds
that is what i am trying to do, but i am always working a version behind and the new seems much better. plus i am struggling to replicate your results
  • #3,253
  • Jan 10, 2019 1:46am Jan 10, 2019 1:46am
Quoting fabio.g
{quote} that is what i am trying to do, but i am always working a version behind and the new seems much better. plus i am struggling to replicate your results
If BT is monthly Jan-Dec, the average profit is only around 80-200%
But if BT is directly from Jan-Dec, extreme profits.
Here is DD with BT monthly
JAN: 62% DD
FEB: DD 55%
MAR: DD 50%
APR: DD 20%
MAY: DD 55%
JUN: DD 35%
JUL: DD 31%
AUG: DD 54%
SEP: DD 30%
OCT: DD 6.5%
NOV: DD 13%
DEC: DD 24%
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,254
  • Jan 10, 2019 2:11am Jan 10, 2019 2:11am
Quoting mrgmrg
{quote} If BT is monthly Jan-Dec, the average profit is only around 80-200% But if BT is directly from Jan-Dec, extreme profits. Here is DD with BT monthly JAN: 62% DD FEB: DD 55% MAR: DD 50% APR: DD 20% MAY: DD 55% JUN: DD 35% JUL: DD 31% AUG: DD 54% SEP: DD 30% OCT: DD 6.5% NOV: DD 13% DEC: DD 24%
on one pair that is affordable even considering withdrawing 50% of the profit at the end of each month.
  • #3,255
  • Jan 10, 2019 3:34am Jan 10, 2019 3:34am
Hello everyone! I see you are focusing on set A, I find set B much more performing, are not you?
  • #3,256
  • Jan 10, 2019 4:40am Jan 10, 2019 4:40am
Quoting martico79
Hello everyone! I see you are focusing on set A, I find set B much more performing, are not you?
Yups Set B with a Hedge.
What is discussed about Set A is for the next version with a formula multiplier that does not exist in version V1_09_3.
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,257
  • Jan 10, 2019 5:23am Jan 10, 2019 5:23am
Quoting martico79
Hello everyone! I see you are focusing on set A, I find set B much more performing, are not you?
About alternative Set B, try changing it to:
Signal_Level -1 or -2
Max_Open_First_Order = 5 or other
Max_Open_Position = 30 or other
Margin_Percent = 0.1
BB_Period = 0
And see the results, many transactions support each other, thereby reducing the possibility of MC

Rgds
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
  • #3,258
  • Jan 10, 2019 5:26am Jan 10, 2019 5:26am
i can use in my account fixed lot?
  • #3,259
  • Jan 10, 2019 5:27am Jan 10, 2019 5:27am
Quoting martico79
Hello everyone! I see you are focusing on set A, I find set B much more performing, are not you?
Depending on broker, Set B could perform worst than set A, especially if your broker forces a 100% margin on the hedge portion of the trade, you can quickly run out of margin.
  • #3,260
  • Jan 10, 2019 5:27am Jan 10, 2019 5:27am
Quoting majidlovio
i can use in my account fixed lot?
Can, Auto_lot_size=false
margiyono61 gmail com, Telegr @Margiyono
2 traders viewing now