Disliked{quote} According to your screenshots you should be billionaire by now, whats life like on a super yacht ?Ignored
2
Supply and Demand Thread using any Indicator 64 replies
Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies
Supply and demand zones and EW principles 1 reply
Alifari's - Supply & Demand Thread 17 replies
Demand and Supply 1 reply
Disliked{quote} According to your screenshots you should be billionaire by now, whats life like on a super yacht ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is a typical post of an ignorant ff member who refuses to read the whole thread.Ignored
DislikedDidn't get up in time for the open. Look at the PA off the zone. Slam dunk setup this one. This one could run some. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I am enjoying the run on GU only, since 2758 monday was key, there was supply zone on all time frames with great PA for shortsIgnored
Disliked{quote} I am enjoying the run on GU only, since 2758 monday was key, there was supply zone on all time frames with great PA for shorts {image}Ignored
DislikedHere is the 6E at the moment on 4hr, 1hr, and 15 min.... I think we will head up to the 4hr supply level next week. My reasoning is because it looks like we've most recently hit a well-defined demand zone,the supply that's stopped us from going up is sloppy, therefore we will continue higher until we hit a well-defined supply zone. Anybody see it differently? {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Looks good to me Jack. I see today's PA also formed a H1 demand zone. It's looking bullish to me but it's a very tight range and wouldn't want any positions open for the weekend. There was a nice LTF short off S/R today into that demand zone. Missed both plays as stuck in work and happened around NFP. Also a very nice short on UCAD weekly zone this week. It's making me itchy to trade more pairs again just to find some more action.Ignored
Disliked{quote} As far as my reasoning, does that sound accurate to you? - hitting a defined demand most recently, etc. is that how you like to look at things as well?Ignored