Random Walk Theory applying in Expert Advisor

how many positions are closed?

I do agree, it does not look good with mega SL and micro TP, risk reward is screwed up...but here we are targetting to open and close multiple positions which are genered randomly.

why it is needed to trade randomly, when we can wait for a good trade set up, and execute trade with good risk reward like 20:100 or 50:100 so on?

Absolutely we can, in that case we could have 2-3 opportunity weekly on a single pair to do so.

Why this randomness is useful? I tell you my story. My real accounts are tagged with rebate agents. What does it mean, the more i trade I get additional dollar from them.

So if able to do 100 trades with losing 2% of my account equty, i will be earning atleast 5% from the rebate agent.

Hence, EA with handsome trading capability will be very effective here.

Updated trade summary after US open on the first day of the week:-

Updated Equity

Showing sell/buy - profit, lot, count etc.

Open trades - 4 buy with 0.04 lots, 6 sell with 0.08 lots - Negative Equity 0.07%

Profit as of now ( 3rd day) 11.43 %

Here is one more analysis to understand lot balancing -

So far -it has used lots -0.01, 0.03 and 0.04 - this EA is not going to increase the lots more than 0.04 for a single trade - this is just a precausion to save account equity.

It increases when it has a bandwidth upto 0.10 lots in total.

Remember I told about one EA containing multiple EAs it means there are multiple strategies to overcome a situation when the EA is not able to close all trades in >2 USD profit.

- 0.01 is Strategy one
-0.01 is strategy two
-0.03 is strategy three
- 0.04 is strategy four

If you look at the trade history - You will get lot of positions are getting closed with >3 USD profit - because most of the time EA will not be able to close all positions in USD 2 profit.

Why so?

If we try to attempt that - only closing when we have overall profit - we have to increase lot size infinite times which will result margin call on equity. Thus, this is my attempt to address this particular issue in a very conservative way.

What best we can do when we have a stelmate situation - which means open positions are not getting closed by EA for long time and we are not having trade done by EA?

Could be - positions with negative 100 USD will get closed first and new position will be freed up for EA to trade. By that time how much it has profited that will be a consideration point.

Any better thought on this?

Hour 23 and Zero (24| 0) are excluded to perform any action, so if your positions are in profit >3, EA is not going to close them.

12.92 % profit as of now with 0.06% negative positions - 5 Buy (0.05 lot) ans 5 sell (0.08 lot) open

One notable point from trade history is - EA should be able to dynamically adjust TP/SL for old positions. May be in next release I will add this feature.

Well my result is rather poor today ((((

My open positions are also not good

Well probably today is not a lucky day for this system... Let's see....

See, lets not put it in multiple pairs on same platform. I tried this early and failed.

Why because the conservative approach of securing your equity is lost. The more you add pairs the more vulnarability comes.

I have shown on a single pair EUR USD, you may definitely try with other USD pairs, but just dont put this on multiple charts.

Lets not make it complicated please.

If it able to give to some % of profit, then we will see how to increase it in future.

Follow a gentle walk, no rush, no run.

on your trade history i see lot positions are opened >0.04, EA is limited to open trades upto 0.04 so I am little confused how come greater lots are opened. I hope you have not opened them manually.

Works perfectly for me. Just one pair GU.

nice, GU is my best pair too.