High Win Ratio EA | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

How to get 1-5 pips with 100% win ratio? 89 replies

Win/Loss Ratio and R/R Ratio Link? 11 replies

What trading system generates the best win/loss ratio? 7 replies

Win/loss ratio question 20 replies

Attachments: High Win Ratio EA
Exit Attachments

High Win Ratio EA

  • #1
  • First Post: Edited Jun 13, 2018 6:09am Jun 12, 2018 11:33am | Edited Jun 13, 2018 6:09am
i have extract it from another forum. its performance good on all TF and also specially on EUUS , USJP and main pairs also results are good.i am sharing it that all traders and programming expert to back-test/forward-test and post the result and also share their suggestions to improve it
Attached File(s)
File Type: ex4 AA_EA.ex4   61 KB | 877 downloads
File Type: mq4 AA_EA.mq4   31 KB | 1,059 downloads
  • #2
  • Jun 12, 2018 12:41pm Jun 12, 2018 12:41pm
Are there any indicators that go with the EA?
Any set files?
Anything else we need?
  • #3
  • Jun 12, 2018 12:53pm Jun 12, 2018 12:53pm
Quoting billbss
Are there any indicators that go with the EA? Any set files? Anything else we need?
no indicator need it and you can try it on default setting and also according to your lot min/max setting
  • #4
  • Jun 12, 2018 1:08pm Jun 12, 2018 1:08pm
doesn't open any trades in backtest on default.
  • #5
  • Jun 12, 2018 1:09pm Jun 12, 2018 1:09pm
I ran several backtests. Time frame is irrelevant - the EA trades on price momentum. Backtests look fantastic, but this EA will never work on a real account, due to execution speed, slippage, etc.
  • #6
  • Jun 12, 2018 6:29pm Jun 12, 2018 6:29pm
Quoting ChicagoRob
I ran several backtests. Time frame is irrelevant - the EA trades on price momentum. Backtests look fantastic, but this EA will never work on a real account, due to execution speed, slippage, etc.
then these settings can be change according to pairs
  • #7
  • Jun 12, 2018 7:04pm Jun 12, 2018 7:04pm
Quoting ahmedabbas
{quote} then these settings can be change according to pairs
what logic of entries and exits does the EA use?
  • #8
  • Jun 12, 2018 9:45pm Jun 12, 2018 9:45pm
any dependencies file needed? seems no trades could be opened under JPY pairs.
  • #9
  • Jun 12, 2018 10:07pm Jun 12, 2018 10:07pm
Quoting yalgaar
{quote} what logic of entries and exits does the EA use?
I too would like to know this, otherwise I can not help suggest any improvement.

If you extract from another place, do you have the mq4 so that you can even work on it?

Best Regards,
Tzamo
"Work hard, put in the effort, and follow your dreams..." -Me
  • #10
  • Jun 13, 2018 12:37am Jun 13, 2018 12:37am
Subs, Thanks and
Regards
  • #11
  • Jun 13, 2018 6:16am Jun 13, 2018 6:16am
i have also uploaded source code file in my first post for all .......to get better understanding about it.... because it will take long time it i guide every person individually so you will easily extract the idea from source file.........thanks for all to take interest ...........hope you will improve it
  • #12
  • Jun 13, 2018 6:33am Jun 13, 2018 6:33am
Quoting ahmedabbas
i have also uploaded source code file in my first post for all .......to get better understanding about it.... because it will take long time it i guide every person individually so you will easily extract the idea from source file.........thanks for all to take interest ...........hope you will improve it

Thanks. I will do some research on this and let you know my findings. I am an expert coder myself so the code does not help me much. But having a source code is good since it is transparent now. I am sure there are many coders in the forum who might be able to chip in and give us some idea about the logic user. I will continue some back testing and checking the trades taken to get an idea in the meanwhile.

I did noticed that if you increase the spreads to a certain size the EA does not take any trades. I also noticed that the EA is taking HUGE lots. But I still find it amazing the huge ROI with so little DD. :-)
  • #13
  • Jun 13, 2018 6:37am Jun 13, 2018 6:37am
Quoting yalgaar
{quote} Thanks. I will do some research on this and let you know my findings. I am an expert coder myself so the code does not help me much. But having a source code is good since it is transparent now. I am sure there are many coders in the forum who might be able to chip in and give us some idea about the logic user. I will continue some back testing and checking the trades taken to get an idea in the meanwhile. I did noticed that if you increase the spreads to a certain size the EA does not take any trades. I also noticed that the EA is taking...
Thank you dear ....no doubt lot size it huge but i have test it on default setting and also on small size spread & lot sizes .....results are fantastic in back testing....
  • #14
  • Jun 13, 2018 8:09am Jun 13, 2018 8:09am
When you look at the backtest results, you will see that the EA will wait days, and sometimes weeks, before it trades. And when it does, virtually all the trades are on one price bar. The trade logic is based on price velocity, or momentum. I've tested similar EA's, all of which produce too-good-to-be-true results in the strategy tester. All have failed on demo, mostly due to problems with latency, order execution, slippage, and spreads. In the real world, on live accounts, EAs of this type will never be successful.
  • #15
  • Jun 13, 2018 10:14am Jun 13, 2018 10:14am
Quoting ChicagoRob
When you look at the backtest results, you will see that the EA will wait days, and sometimes weeks, before it trades. And when it does, virtually all the trades are on one price bar. The trade logic is based on price velocity, or momentum. I've tested similar EA's, all of which produce too-good-to-be-true results in the strategy tester. All have failed on demo, mostly due to problems with latency, order execution, slippage, and spreads. In the real world, on live accounts, EAs of this type will never be successful.
thanks for your sharing your ideas........now i am testing it on demo account and i will share the result in future....
  • #16
  • Jun 13, 2018 1:17pm Jun 13, 2018 1:17pm
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: MetaTrader - EXNESS.png Size: 122 KB
  • #17
  • Jun 13, 2018 1:47pm Jun 13, 2018 1:47pm
as the print screen show above
34 trade in real ECN account during the FOMC time
on backtest mode，5 trades
  • #18
  • Jun 13, 2018 2:24pm Jun 13, 2018 2:24pm
I can not enteder because this specialist is very good at backtest but does not work on live account
  • #19
  • Jun 13, 2018 2:26pm Jun 13, 2018 2:26pm
Me too: Thingy traded a lot on Fed, only not into profit. Backtesting this kind of EA on MT4 is useless (->fake momentum).
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1306181.png Size: 37 KB
Return To Disorder
  • #20
  • Jun 14, 2018 10:39am Jun 14, 2018 10:39am
Quoting fatpanda
as the print screen show above 34 trade in real ECN account during the FOMC time on backtest mode，5 trades
I don't understand: why are the results so different between training account backtests and live backtests? I know that spreads depends on the broker, but as it's generally a very small amount, does it really change something here?

Moreover what is the "fake momentum"?
0 traders viewing now