2024 Milankovitch cycle | Forex Factory

Options

Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

The Pitfalls Of Cycle Trading 2 replies

Where can I download the ADXR and Schaff Trend Cycle indicators? 3 replies

Does Anyone use the Cycle Tool? 1 reply

Cycle trading 6 replies

Cycle indicators 1 reply

Attachments: 2024 Milankovitch cycle
Exit Attachments

2024 Milankovitch cycle

  • #1
  • First Post: Edited 9:09pm Jan 31, 2018 6:33pm | Edited 9:09pm
Greetings to all.

I keep coming across this thing called the milankovitch cycle which is going to happen in 2024 and will last for some years, or something like that.

The implications of such an event could apparently change the world so Presumably the lead up to such an event will see all markets react wildly.

So what I can be sure of so far is that this is a real event and not some fairy tale 2012 subject.

Seeing as this is 2018 the master year 11, is this the final cycle?

Do I know what I'm talking about, not really.

I am probably not the best thread host because I do like to joke, so I apologise in advance, but I am seriously interested to learn more about this and it's affect on the markets prior to its arrival so i will treat all who wish to post any info, cycles or whatever on this subject with respect.

All welcome, and I will post information as i find it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

Any videos I post are just ones found on YouTube and I am not affiliated with any YouTube user.
FREEDOM IS SECURITY.
  • #2
  • Jan 31, 2018 8:14pm Jan 31, 2018 8:14pm
I have shed loads to talk about, corn, utilities etc but today I posted on cable thread. So let's get started.

Now I look and see 2008 in the making, Anyone else?

GBPUSD 8 year lows and 2024 represented as vertical black line.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot_2018-02-01-02-05-01.jpg Size: 124 KB
FREEDOM IS SECURITY.
  • #3
  • Edited 9:07pm Jan 31, 2018 8:37pm | Edited 9:07pm
Inserted Video


Inserted Video
FREEDOM IS SECURITY.
  • #4
  • Edited Feb 1, 2018 2:24am Jan 31, 2018 8:47pm | Edited Feb 1, 2018 2:24am
Oh, Milankovitch cycles. Reminds me talk about catastrophic global warming drama (that in recent years transforms into climate change drama) and this supposed to be caused by human emission of CO2 and how we ended up with paid tokens created out of thin air, so to speak. That is how you make real money, selling trillions of worthless tokens for real assets.

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/env...kovitch-cycles

Does it work in market speculations? For sure in commodities like crops. Climate cycles will cause shortages and geographic growing shifts with some delays, which can be exploited. Following that, it could be exploited by forex market. For instance, how this cycle will affect usdmxn, where crops are major part of Mexican economy?
  • #5
  • Jan 31, 2018 10:06pm Jan 31, 2018 10:06pm
Man, I went into this thread with a curious mind several hours ago. Now after reading the entire internet on milankovitch I have come to conclusion that our time together is short and if we ever meet you will likely be my next dinner because I'll be starving and cold.

There is no sensible discussion here now, my brain is frazzled and I don't like skiing.

It cannot be real. It is just frightening.

Time to ease one's mind

Inserted Video
FREEDOM IS SECURITY.
  • #6
  • Jan 31, 2018 11:20pm Jan 31, 2018 11:20pm
Ah, Sweden, home of the Volvo.
The entire rationale for wind turbines is to stop global warming by reducing the amount of CO2 being returned to the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels.
In the attached picture, recently taken in Sweden, freezing cold weather has caused the rotor blades of a wind turbine to ice up bringing the blades to a complete stop.
To fix the “problem” a helicopter is employed (burning aviation fuel) to spray hot water (which is heated in the frigid temperatures using a truck equipped with a 260 kW oil burner) on the blades of the turbine to de-ice them.
The aviation fuel, the diesel for the truck, and the oil burned to heat the water, could produce more electricity (at the right time to meet demand) than the unfrozen wind turbine could ever produce. (Before it freezes up again).
The attached picture is a metaphor of the complete insanity of the climate change debate.
In decades to come this one photo alone will sum up an era of stupidity, when rational thought, logic and commonsense was abandoned and immense wealth and resources needlessly sacrificed.


Attached Image



SO THE MARKET CAN SEE
people leave, but this thread will go on for ever
  • #7
  • Feb 1, 2018 2:20am Feb 1, 2018 2:20am
Quoting hippiedog
Man, I went into this thread with a curious mind several hours ago. Now after reading the entire internet on milankovitch I have come to conclusion that our time together is short and if we ever meet you will likely be my next dinner because I'll be starving and cold. There is no sensible discussion here now, my brain is frazzled and I don't like skiing. It cannot be real. It is just frightening. Time to ease one's mind https://youtu.be/Vb2OYGqUbOA
You WILL die, one way or other. See that turbine above, you will be gone before it will be decommissioned. Indeed, your time here is short, maybe next 50-60 years or less. Several decades, what is it in the face of eternity

http://www.lifeinhalfasecond.com
  • #8
  • Feb 15, 2018 4:40pm Feb 15, 2018 4:40pm
Quoting Aussi
Ah, Sweden, home of the Volvo. The entire rationale for wind turbines is to stop global warming by reducing the amount of CO2 being returned to the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels. In the attached picture, recently taken in Sweden, freezing cold weather has caused the rotor blades of a wind turbine to ice up bringing the blades to a complete stop. To fix the “problem” a helicopter is employed (burning aviation fuel) to spray hot water (which is heated in the frigid temperatures using a truck equipped with a 260 kW oil burner)...

Another clear example of the ABSURDITY of the liberal Al Gore style lunatics all over the world. When "GLOBAL WARMING"
label failed to draw in more followers the title was changed to "Climate Change". Same lie just another title. The picture is a VERY CLEAR example. Yes CLIMATES CHANGE & its called WEATHER CYCLES. Thanks you for sharing.

_____________________
  • #9
  • Last Post: Feb 15, 2018 11:32pm Feb 15, 2018 11:32pm
Quoting acetrader
{quote} Another clear example of the ABSURDITY of the liberal Al Gore style lunatics all over the world. When "GLOBAL WARMING" label failed to draw in more followers the title was changed to "Climate Change". Same lie just another title. The picture is a VERY CLEAR example. Yes CLIMATES CHANGE & its called WEATHER CYCLES. Thanks you for sharing. _____________________

This article appeared in the Rockhampton morning Bulletin on 22.12.09.

This is an excellent piece for anybody who needs to be educated about
Australia's Coal driven power houses.
Terry is now retired and is in excellent health at age 69. Nobody paid
him to write the article which was, (to their credit), published by
the local press.

Written By Terence Cardwell <[email protected]>
The Editor

The Morning Bulletin.
I have sat by for a number of years frustrated at the rubbish being
put forth about carbon dioxide emissions, thermal coal fired power
stations and renewable energy and the ridiculous Emissions Trading
Scheme.

Frustration at the lies told (particularly during the election) about
global pollution. Using Power Station cooling towers for an example.
The condensation coming from those cooling towers is as pure as that
that comes out of any kettle.

Frustration about the so called incorrectly named man made 'carbon
emissions' which of course is Carbon Dioxide emissions and what it is
supposedly doing to our planet.

Frustration about the lies told about renewable energy and the
deliberate distortion of renewable energy and its ability to replace
fossil fuel energy generation. And frustration at the ridiculous
carbon credit programme which is beyond comprehension.

And further frustration at some members of the public who have not got
a clue about thermal Power Stations or Renewable Energy. Quoting
ridiculous figures about something they clearly have little or no
knowledge of.

First coal fired power stations do NOT send 60 to 70% of the energy up
the chimney. The boilers of modern power station are 96% efficient and
the exhaust heat is captured by the economisers and reheaters and heat
the air and water before entering the boilers.

The very slight amount exiting the stack is moist as in condensation
and CO2. There is virtually no fly ash because this is removed by the
precipitators or bagging plant that are 99.98% efficient. The 4% lost
is heat through boiler wall convection.

Coal fired Power Stations are highly efficient with very little heat
loss and can generate massive amount of energy for our needs. They can
generate power at efficiency of less than 10,000 b.t.u. per kilowatt
and cost wise that is very low.

The percentage cost of mining and freight is very low. The total cost
of fuel is 8% of total generation cost and does NOT constitute a major
production cost.

As for being laughed out of the country, China is building multitudes
of coal fired power stations because they are the most efficient for
bulk power generation.

We have, like, the USA, coal fired power stations because we HAVE the
raw materials and are VERY fortunate to have them. Believe me no one
is laughing at Australia - exactly the reverse, they are very envious
of our raw materials and independence.

The major percentage of power in Europe and U.K. is nuclear because
they don't have the coal supply for the future.

Yes it would be very nice to have clean, quiet, cheap energy in bulk
supply. Everyone agrees that it would be ideal. You don't have to be a
genius to work that out. But there is only one problem---It doesn't
exist.

Yes - there are wind and solar generators being built all over the
world but they only add a small amount to the overall power demand.

The maximum size wind generator is 3 Megawatts, which can rarely be
attained on a continuous basis because it requires substantial forces
of wind. And for the same reason only generate when there is
sufficient wind to drive them. This of course depends where they are
located but usually they only run for 45% -65% of the time, mostly
well below maximum capacity. They cannot be relied for a 'base load'
because they are too variable. And they certainly could not be used
for load control.

The peak load demand for electricity in Australia is approximately
50,000 Megawatts and only small part of this comes from the Snowy
Hydro Electric System (The ultimate power Generation) because it is
only available when water is there from snow melt or rain. And yes
they can pump it back but it costs to do that. (Long Story).

Tasmania is very fortunate in that they have mostly hydro electric
generation because of their high amounts of snow and rainfall. They
also have wind generators (located in the roaring forties) but that is
only a small amount of total power generated.

Based on a average generating output of 1.5 megawatts (of unreliable
power) you would require over 33,300 wind generators.

As for solar power generation much research has been done over the
decades and there are two types. Solar thermal generation and Solar
Electric generation but in each case they cannot generate large
amounts of electricity.

Any clean, cheap energy is obviously welcomed but they would NEVER
have the capability of replacing Thermal power generation. So get your
heads out of the clouds, do some basic mathematics and look at the
facts not going off with the fairies (or some would say the extreme
greenies.)

We are all greenies in one form or another and care very much about
our planet. The difference is most of us are realistic. Not in some
idyllic utopia where everything can be made perfect by standing around
holding a banner and being a general pain in the backside.

Here are some facts that will show how ridiculous this financial
madness the government is following. Do the simple maths and see for
yourselves.

According to the 'believers' the CO2 in air has risen from .034% to
.038% in air over the last 50 years.

To put the percentage of Carbon Dioxide in air in a clearer perspective;

If you had a room 12 ft x 12 ft x 7 ft or 3.7 mtrs x 3.7 mtrs x 2.1
mtrs, the area carbon dioxide would occupy in that room would be .25m
x .25m x .17m or the size of a large packet of cereal.

Australia emits 1 percent of the world's total carbon Dioxide and the
government wants to reduce this by twenty percent or reduce emissions
by .2 percent of the world's total CO2 emissions.

What effect will this have on existing CO2 levels?

By their own figures they state the CO2 in air has risen from .034% to
.038% in 50 years.

Assuming this is correct, the world CO2 has increased in 50 years by
.004 percent.

Per year that is .004 divided by 50 = .00008 percent. (Getting
confusing -but stay with me).

Of that because we only contribute 1% our emissions would cause CO2 to
rise .00008 divided by 100 = .0000008 percent.

Of that 1%, we supposedly emit, the governments wants to reduce it by
20% which is 1/5th of .0000008 = .00000016 percent effect per year
they would have on the world CO2 emissions based on their own figures.

That would equate to a area in the same room, as the size of a small pin.!!!

For that they have gone crazy with the ridiculous trading schemes,
Solar and roofing installations, Clean coal technology. Renewable
energy, etc, etc.

How ridiculous it that.

The cost to the general public and industry will be enormous. Cripple
and even closing some smaller business.

T.L. Cardwell

To the Editor I thought I should clarify. I spent 25 years in the
Electricity Commission of NSW working, commissioning and operating the
various power units. My last was the 4 X 350 MW Munmorah Power Station
near Newcastle. I would be pleased to supply you any information you
may require.

--
people leave, but this thread will go on for ever
0 traders viewing now