DislikedNot a big fan of BB, but here is my version of the EA. {file} {image}Ignored
Psychology, Mathematics and Numerology 21 replies
A "hardcore" mathematics question 65 replies
Mathematics of Money Management 1 reply
But still losing money left and right.
Backtest for USDJPY from 1st Jan to 8th Dec 2017, using TickData Suite (99.9% quality tickdata, real spread and slippage):
Disliked{quote} Cleaned up the code a bit Added (timed) Trailing Stop (updates TS every 1s in profit) Added Break Even. Modified it so that it only takes 1 entry per Candle. But still losing money left and right. Backtest for USDJPY from 1st Jan to 8th Dec 2017, using TickData Suite (99.9% quality tickdata, real spread and slippage): {image} {image} {file} {file}Ignored
DislikedAdded Time filter settings {file} What parameters are you using? And what pair? Your modelling quality says "n/a", so I'd be cautious. To have meaningful backtest results it is recommended to always use real tickdata + variable spread + slippage simulation.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Cleaned up the code a bit Added (timed) Trailing Stop (updates TS every 1s in profit) Added Break Even. Modified it so that it only takes 1 entry per Candle. But still losing money left and right. Backtest for USDJPY from 1st Jan to 8th Dec 2017, using TickData Suite (99.9% quality tickdata, real spread and slippage): {image} {image} {file} {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Friend need to modify when EA take SL then next 5 candle EA don't open any order .Ignored
Disliked{quote} Cleaned up the code a bit Added (timed) Trailing Stop (updates TS every 1s in profit) Added Break Even. Modified it so that it only takes 1 entry per Candle. But still losing money left and right. Backtest for USDJPY from 1st Jan to 8th Dec 2017, using TickData Suite (99.9% quality tickdata, real spread and slippage): {image} {image} {file} {file}Ignored
Disliked{quote} You may certainly get it right after hard work. I believe the thread starter did not get it without hard work/backtest/backcheckIgnored