Need EA for simple profitable system

Hi

i help to automate my strategy . here is my idea , if you look at the beginning of the Sydney opening market in M5 , you can see market will goes up or down, i need and expert advisor to open trade buy and sell at the same time with ex.10 pips sl and 20 pips tp (these parameters should be adjustable ) . non of trade should close if any of those goes on profit,one of them should hit sl .

so EA need :
- Start hour
- Close trade hour ( close open trade for example in 10PM )
- TP
- SL
- Lot

thanks programmers for your help .

Here you go

thank you very much AlLaN.r0

can you please make it to work on lower time frame like m15 and only open trade at the time we set on ea and leave them to hit sl one of them,i mean no ending close trade . at the lower time frame it open trade by every candles .

i explained in photo . if candles move in one of the side there is no loss ,

You could try setting a resistance level using the PRICE_CLOSE or what ever. You would need to take the price from a certain time period in the past, say 10 candle sticks ago. Then make a formula. Price_Close > or < (price10 candle sticks ago - ( resistence formula)); I'm not sure how to get price from said time. You'd also have to make the program start a new cycle every 10 candles. It's doable, but I don't have code on hand.

what would be the logic to open the trade?

It is not working on a timeframe, you just place the hour when you want it to start.
I am not a programmer, I usually find a freelancer and I pay him when I want an ea.

You're paying unnecessary spread/commission to your br0ker, in certain situations. For example, consider the way that price behaved in your diagram in post #5. You would have made +20 pips on your buy and -10 on your sell, for a net +10, but you had to pay your br0ker for BOTH orders. You could have made the same net +10 pips, but paid for only ONE order, if you'd simply opened a buy at point A, and closed it at point B (see my amendment to your screenshot).

So what you need to do is figure out all of the possible paths that price could take, and the minimum number of orders you need to open and close, at each key price level, for each different scenario. Sure, it will make your rules more complex, but will save you a HUGE amount of money in the long run. (And your br0ker will hate you for it. )

_____________________________________

[EDIT] I've given this some more thought. If I understand your system correctly, it is functionally equivalent to the straddle in the diagram below, provided that when one of the two straddle orders gets opened the other is immediately cancelled (OCO). In this version there is only ever one order open, so you are only ever paying one spread/commission to your broker whereas in your version you are always paying twice. I leave it up to you to satisfy yourself that this replicates your system in every possible scenario, whichever way price moves from the origin point.

Scenario #1: price moves to A then to B.
Your system: sell hits SL at A for -10 pips, buy goes to TP at B for +20. Net result is +10.
Straddle system: buy is opened at A (sell is cancelled), buy then goes to TP at B for same net result of +10.

Scenario #2: price moves to A then to C.
Your system: sell hits SL at A for -10 pips, buy hits SL at C for -10. Net result is -20.
Straddle system: buy is opened at A (sell is cancelled), buy goes to SL at C for -20. Same net result.

Scenario #3: price moves to C then to D.
Your system: buy hits SL at C for -10 pips, sell goes to TP at D for +20. Net result is +10.
Straddle system: sell is opened at C (buy is cancelled), sell then goes to TP at D for same net result of +10.

Scenario #4: price moves to C then to A.
Your system: buy hits SL at C for -10 pips, sell hits SL at A for -10. Net result is -20.
Straddle system: sell is opened at C (buy is cancelled), sell goes to SL at A for -20. Same net result.

I believe that's covered all possible scenarios. Same net result every time, and with no added complication, but costs paid to the br0ker are halved in every scenario by using the straddle approach. QED.