Disliked{quote} Oh, I think that I understand it now that you've completed the sentence. So, say that the little zone I've overlooked, the one removed by 'C', does not exist. {image} Now, i) 'A' is valid because it removed 'B' ii) 'B' is also valid because it removed 'C', even though the 'C' did not remove anything. iii) 'C' is then not valid because it did not remove anything. Not to be ignored, still a selling zone. Are the statements correct? Edit: I removed another zone from the picture, so 'B' removes only 'C'.Ignored
For the S.A.D trader using the validation rule, then a zone only becomes valid if and when it removes another valid zone.
So if the zone removed was not a valid one then the zone that removed it would not be considered valid either
Please understand that the rules around validation are important but not the only ones. There are several other odds enhancers S.A.D traders consider
I am sure the traders here will help as much as they can as you interact with them positing your topdown analysis with questions.
You may also find watching the videos on the sister youtube channel helps with questions you have
best wishes
Be careful what you think because your thoughts run your life..Solomon
1
