Disliked{quote} Disclaimer: I don't know what Oanda's been telling you. If liquidity dries up for whatever length of time, why would the bid/offer spread remain static if the market makers behind those bids and offers take off their interests from the market? You can call the widening of the spread a purely "profit-taking move and artificially induced" if it makes you feel any better. But having been an interbank market maker in my previous life, I know enough NOT to leave any money on the table (and consequently any of MY bids or offers in the market)...Ignored

As far as "making me feel better" I was simply stating that I wasn't getting the mechanics and the only explanation I'd ever heard was some vague references to "low liquidity" which wasn't making much sense to me (I thought this was clear from "I guess the real problem is that I don't understand..."). Anyone that is looking for reasons to "feel better" about losing on a trade is playing the wrong game... I'm looking to understand why these things happen so that I don't walk into them again.
It sure would be interesting to analyze some of the spread movements on the very short timescales that Nanex puts out in their analysis of stock movements occasionally... it seems, from my workstation at least, that the time for the news release rolls over, the pair starts to move, then the spread goes nuts... it widens a few pips before and then when the news hits it goes really wide shortly after, then normalizes... probably mostly perception or lag, but it would be cool to see the data
