Spectrometer indy seems good for trading

0815:
Trade opens at red having crossed over (cursor pointing) and closes due to latter Damiani reverse crossed, a 17pip-er.
The earlier 0600 high inpact moment did not have Damiani oriented yet nor did it seem to have much impact.

About 10pips at this closing (cursor pointing), at 0140 my PacTime.
What allowed trade to open is the Mom15 waiting for ma7 to be in same direction.

I didn't post yesterday, seemed like tiny gainer vs loser.

So far "doesn't seem" like those tiny plus & minus accumulation-vacillations can oppose good pip grabbers., might be a concern for spreads greater than 1.

Starting in time from where cursor is........is both red & orange phase velocity (for TFs 200 & 100) above .3 til all the way to end of chart due to this kind of consistent movement being an indecisuve between all the difference TF traders, so even though there's a trend south at the end there is no unified impetus by a major influencing group that gave the movement.
You can see where there's two earlier flat <.3 regions that DOES indicate where there is unified impetus from TFs 200 & 100.

Yesterday, 1st pic, area between red spikes <.4 early to left of chart demarks prospective zone, and same chart 2nd pic, both red & orange ampvel1 in unison takes off and maintains increasing velocity, so taking trade here is safe.
I.E., high impulse from both red & orange group of traders yields high confidence in a movement.

3rd pic, Wedn morn, vertical scale is 5.5pips per, so kinda can tell not much happening to confidently take.
pic demonstrates this as there's no combined impetus from both red & orange simultaneously.

Voila!?

Good possibility it's "making it so", Captain Picard.

Welcome once again to this fx Spectrometry Research corner. :O
As mentioned by Clemmo, he wants to know where the composite line was long ago, well guess what, eyeballing closely I see there's a direct correlation of the sum of all 4 color spectrum freqencies to the movement, in fact the strength of such movement is seeming to be the velocity of the velocity (aka "acceleration") of the sum of the absolute value of each, the direction determined by ma26. (ma7 is merely a "starting out of the gate" nicety).
It's not easy to eyeball summing all 4 and conjecting where that sum has no more velocity change to these velocity lines ("acceleration"), but scanning most anywhere across chart that becomes apparent. If I weren't saving $$ for a place to stay overseas I'd be adding that option to Spectrometr_v2 indy for template to setup! QueSeRa, so that's "later gators", lol. In meantime, that's exciting and revelatory(!), thanks to one listening in, Clemmo!

To the right of chart is NFP 0530, usually to stay away from as often very bouncy (indicative of the first pic of small bump up for red, later red phasevel1 noisy but settles in time for an acceleration confirmation, to wit, after that around 0730 is another high impact that this technique of acceleration still holds true, first by the orange 100, followed by red 200.
Eyeballed cases to the left on chart, theory still holds true, acceleration of the sum of the absolute values of the four. Think its a matter of a parameter for how much otherwise could be just tiny pip slices, but Wo! No losers!? Far better than prior strategy plans!? Hey wait, yeah, the other straight indicators aren't here anymore, this is all spects! Wooo! No wonder more purely indicative!

So far this seems promising. Look for the calm after the storm. It's classic trend-following.

Thhinking ahead (and aloud, hahaha) of a version of Spectrometr_v2 that has 3 lines, red200 phasevel1, red200 ampvel1, & Velocity of sum of absolute values of spect1, 2, 3, & 4 ampvel1's (acceleration), since just 3 buffers it again wouldn't be any more buffer jamming than it has been. May need have adjustable math on that summation deal to experiment. Thinking it'll be $150, sorry that currently am SO stingy with money, if not it's actually risky otherwise traveling Internationally.

Later an EA to have parameters for various quantities of such and the ma26 & ma7 to optimize.

Keepin' on eyeballing in meantime.

From 16:05 (cursor) onward it's still ok low red smooth region to catch this downward move, and 2nd pic at same time has 3 of the 4 sinewaves increasing in amplitude velocity (absolutes used), so open trade.
The trade stays open coz notice red stays acceleration strong and orange is "hanging in there".

on Friday......here's good example of all the 4 ampvel1's moving away from 0 line, i.e., acceleration (the difference in sum of absolute values of the ampvel1's), ma's concur and thereafter the impulse red is staying up. Otherwise, rest of this day mostly not anything good to catch, too wild, generally good to stay out of Friday's.

pic 1, smooth < .4 allowing combo wave acceleration (pic 2) as indication to take trade.
I added ma3 coz confirmation sometimes check for quick reversals that ma7 & ma26 by themselves are not good enough.

hmmmm, this is fascinating. All 4 sinewave phasevel1 displayed. When alls quiet and flat the 3 mas (ma26, ma7 & ma3) are confirmation indicatiors in either direction to have the trade, in this case the middle of this flat quiet zone closes the trade via ma3 til ma26 allows to open trade in other direction.
Knock on wood this is ongoingly what it is.
:O.

After re-saving the phasevel1 template for spect1234 at this zoom-in (yes, template saving saves the scaling) I note to myself that it would have to be "any two bars in a row FOR any color <.4 absolute-wise is ok to check for confirmations of the 3 ma's". .......otherwise note how red sinewave PhaseVelocity swings plus 'n minus around 0 up to amounts around 1.0, so there could be a few points where it's wrongly thought as ok to check for confirmation and open trade for one bar, which would actually be ok here, but any non-stable period of time is potential for not-good wild jumps in a trade, besides, vertical scaling is only 4 pips per, so this is a gyrating consolidation period of time, and the vibrations in all the colors shows it!
Starting to love this and envision an EA if this approach holds up.

Noticed today that the level to stay below for all 4 phasevel1 colors can be in neighborhood of 1.0, so it definitely will be a parameter for prospective hopeful EA.
Modus operandi still looking ok!

Took this screenshot 7pm PacTime, flat lining combo phasevel1 lines < 1.0 for mostly a good catch, afterward note ma3 juggles up 'n down (times when ma3 not same direction as ma7 & ma15) so a tiny loser about 3 pips in there followed by a tiny gainer to approximately cancel that.

Sorry I haven't been keeping in touch. Busy with my own fixations and life in general.

The screens continue to show promise and I'm surprised you don't have more admirers here. Then again, that seems to be the way on FF, with the most interesting projects receiving the least attention and vice-versa. Have you considered starting a trade explorer for your tests?

Thanks for popping-in and noticing how things are looking hot Clemmo.
Hmmm, Lol, did have me wondering if there's an inverse relationship between a thread being flatlined regarding interest and its actual value arrived at, spooky, i.e., Happy Holloween!
-------
First pic is up to last minute Friday, a tiny gainer went thru, but note how all the 4 colored phasevel's bouncing around keep one out of the morass, love it more each day!
2nd pic, slid chart once to the left, note how phasevel's let a smooth 20pipper go thru, incredible!
You had a hunch within Spectrometry is the answer, and it seems it's so!
This is so easy ........by itself it very well could be manual trading means.
----------
addendum to trading means, already in instruction sheet, wait 2 bars of confirmation of both Spect & ma lines.
--------
What's "trade explorers for your tests" Clemmo?
I just examine with a couple 5min bars per horizontal time scale (vertical lines). One major microscopic examination trick I learned while on FF is for the bar one is interested in, for the cusor on indy line and outputs showing, the cursor pointing should be just at least a gnat's eyebrow PAST that vertical center line, otherwise the prior bar's indy close results will show in the little box not the above bar of interest. That's my "Trade Explorer", me (teehee).
Otherwise, some future month would need to come up with a few hundred dollars for an EA. Why a little expensive? Tough to explain, got to rip out of these indies the Spectrometr_v2 functions that calls the Spectrometer_separate_v3, put those values into a dual short 3 register (i.e., bypassing buffer needs) Might be able to have it for $200. Some time next year.

Another spooky philosophical phenomenon, the more I've backed away putting attention on big vacation plan instead of having regular itchy finger on purchasing more mql work the more the fog cleared away to reveal the answer.
The reasoning I can see why this modus-operandi works is very simply, a consistent volume change in the sinewaves' amplitudes versus cases where the phase jerks it around......makes for smooth moves. Consolidation period like in pic 1 is perfect example of noisy jerk arounds by the phase.

I almost wonder if you haven't invented a solution to the 'choppy markets' identification problem, discussed here however I'm sure the author of that thread would never be satisfied with any proof.

By trade explorers I mean https://www.forexfactory.com/tradeexplorer.php You create a new demo account and then take trades according to the latest template and instructions. Then track performance. I should be doing this already but I have been distracted lately.

hi Clemmo,
I am the author of this thread..........
...........and I guess I could have that and be satisfied.
Thanks for staying tuned-in!

re: Trade explorer,
Would need EA as the trades would be way way too tough to trade manually due to so many hours needing watch chart, best have an EA to be on it 24hrs per tradung day.

However, randomly popping-in on morns to see recent past hours or earlier to catch some live trading-wise is doable with this approach.