Disliked{quote} Hey Cookie, thats kind of what i got out of the first picture- is it possible that the first two entries are rescues with facets of attacks inside seeing how they were entered when price was still contained with in that first LONG leg and price was still expected to head up. Like they could be looked at as rescuing because price was moving against him but they could also be looked at as getting a better average price for the next upswing ie "buying on discount"? then when the low of that leg was breached the position was left to bleed in...Ignored
What you say is exactly as I thought too.
As for the bold part, it has to do with fibo attack and rescue skew plus spiral within spiral. Notice that when 2 3 5 8 are deployed, he has 18 units inside, but when he deploys another 13, he is still fairly near his position average, so rescuing was definitely not needed, but 13/18 which is 0.7 is fairly near 0.6 which is an attack skew, could be that fti had gone to next spiral and considered 18 as 1 group and simply used the next fibo nearest to enter and attack.
Spiral within spiral is for example you have a major spiral of 1 1.5 1.5 and the basic spiral of fibo 1 1 2 3 5 8 13
You can essentially deploy the first spiral say up to 5 when market makes an impulse thrust, you can't attack anymore, you can take 5, leave 1 1 2, then spiral out to 1.5 to attack by using the current foreign caps to skew for a stronger attack, in this case, you have 4 riding from previous campaign, you can deploy 1.5 as scout instead and attack from there.
cuth,
) needs so much study.
,
.